• February 13, 2012
  • NOW WHAT: Ooh looky, the word “Wonkette” was used once in one article in today’s liberal New York Times: “Stranger still, the birth of Cute Overload was almost purely accidental. Meg Frost, a 36-year-old design manager at Apple, started cuteoverload.com three years ago to test Web software. Within months, it became an online institution, drawing about 88,000 unique visitors a day — about the same as the political gossip blog Wonkette.” Delightful. The lesson: even websites that manage to be shittier than Wonkette can attract very large followings. [NYT]

{ 26 comments }

loquaciousmusic August 20, 2008 at 9:54 am

Hah hah! By mistake, I went to CuteOverlord.com! I must be a Wonkette reader!

Godless Liberal * August 20, 2008 at 9:57 am

Even cuteoverload.com does not contain the adorableness that is Bill Kristol.

Serolf Divad August 20, 2008 at 10:03 am

Holy crap! They’ve got a cat with four ears on there now. They should rename the site creepoverload.com.

Dr. Spaceman August 20, 2008 at 10:12 am

You dump on CuteOverload at your own peril, Newell. Watch yourself, or you’ll never enjoy a snorgle again.

freakishlystrong August 20, 2008 at 10:22 am

Nothin’ cute and fuzzy here, we’re all sharp and pointy…

Johnny Zhivago August 20, 2008 at 10:26 am

Sites like fluffyslitterboxcam.com and whatsbehindmysofa.net get more views than Wonkette every day, but it doesn’t mean they have any redeeming value.

The Incomparable Tiny Valdez August 20, 2008 at 10:26 am

I’m switching my default home page from NY Times to CuteOverload.

SayItWithWookies August 20, 2008 at 10:26 am

[re=63696]Serolf Divad[/re]: You must’ve gone to mutationoverload.com by mistake.

Guppy06 August 20, 2008 at 10:30 am

If I hadn’t just gone over there, though, I’d never heave learned about the Tiddy Bear! Wonkette needs more stuffed animals stuffed in cleavage!

tiny mexican August 20, 2008 at 10:35 am

[re=63688]Godless Liberal *[/re]: Or do they?

tiny mexican August 20, 2008 at 10:35 am
NoWireHangers August 20, 2008 at 10:41 am

Don’t hate on the Cuteoverload. I loves that website. Makes me feel clean and pure after diving into the putrid waters that are Our Wonkette.

Serolf Divad August 20, 2008 at 10:44 am

[re=63742]NoWireHangers[/re]:

And vicey versie.

Anita Cocktail August 20, 2008 at 11:10 am

I’m the kind of modern gal that can go from the snark to the snorgle and back again…I mean, really, isn’t a cute wittle kitteh worth a thousand snarling Hillarys or Botoxed McCain foreheads?

NoWireHangers August 20, 2008 at 11:26 am

I just popped over to Cute Overload and the top two posts are eerily similar to Wonkette: Yoda-speak and Wilford Brimley jokes.

jagorev August 20, 2008 at 11:26 am

When you click on the Amazon.com link in the article, instead of taking you to the Cute Overload calendar, it takes you to an NYT corporate profile of AMZN. I hate that. Who designed these links, a strategy consultant? I’m so angry, I’m going to kill my subscription to the Times (ha! like I’ve ever subscribed to a newspaper!) and buy the CuteOverload calendar, and I’m not even a lonely, angsty 18-34 yr old female college grad.

WhatTheHeck August 20, 2008 at 11:36 am

Jim, so you are saying Wonkette is a shitty website, even though there are others that are shittier.
Well Wonkette is the sum of its shitty parts. Us. HaHaHa.

celticagent August 20, 2008 at 11:57 am

I do not think Wonkette is a “shitty website” as you put it. I always enjoy reading your articles and posts! You make me laugh regularly. Keep ‘em coming.

pdiddycornchips August 20, 2008 at 12:02 pm

only 88,000 unique views a day? There’s a simple way to increase those views. Three words. More. Ass. Fucking.

S.Luggo August 20, 2008 at 12:06 pm

[re=63719]Johnny Zhivago[/re]: And Wonkette’s redeeming value is? Thinking. Thinking some more. Still thinking. Feeling a blinding headache behind my eyes. Now vomitting on my shoes. Thinking slowing down. Coma.

S.Luggo August 20, 2008 at 12:12 pm

[re=63742]NoWireHangers[/re]: I see your point. It’s so cleansing to visit after a swim in the turgid intellectual mire that is teh Wonkette: http://mfrost.typepad.com/cute_overload/geeross/index.html
Speaking of intellectual mire, where’s our latest Paultard poster, “[Miss] Liberty”?

NoWireHangers August 20, 2008 at 12:19 pm

[re=63869]S.Luggo[/re]: How’d they get that picture of my apartment?

cal August 20, 2008 at 12:52 pm

[re=63687]loquaciousmusic[/re]: CuteOverlord.com suggests these related searches: Russian Wife, Women, Bunny Costume, Cat Toys, Car Insurance, Cats, Make Love, Dog Lover, Gift, Dog Cat, Russian Brides.

This ontology disturbs me. Especially “Dog Cat.”

moneypenny August 20, 2008 at 1:04 pm

CuteOverload owns.

Politicalchef August 20, 2008 at 2:37 pm

Longtime reader, first time commenter: Shittier than wonkette was four years ago, when you actually broke news? Yes. Shittier than wonkette now? Sorry. Cuteoverload knows its subject, owns its subject, and is constantly finding new ways of explicating that subject. But don’t worry, I read Wonkette every day. I don’t know why, but I do.

simonblehs August 21, 2008 at 1:22 am

Forget breaking news, how about writing anything worth reading?

>The lesson: even websites that manage to be shittier than Wonkette can attract very large followings.

The funny thing is that once, Wonkette was a hilarious, brilliantly written blog. It was a *must-read* for everybody in DC. Now it’s nothing but dorm-room (or basement) screeds written by an obnoxious, frat-boy hack. It’s nothing. It means nothing. It’s utterly ineffectual.

I know that if it were me who took over Wonkette and ran it into the ground this horribly, I wouldn’t dare make fun of any other sites anywhere. If *my* site were being eclipsed by a cute-animal site, I wouldn’t dare say anything bad about anyone anywhere, ever. In fact, I’d be so thoroughly humiliated, I’d have to give it up entirely. Out of whatever pride I might have left.

So. I’m glad I’m not you. Glad I’m not a complete failure. Not a complete laughingstock. Not a washout.

Oh, and in case that didn’t sufficiently insult you because you failed to understand any of it: You, uh, liberal you.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: