• February 13, 2012

VITTER TELLS SENATOR TO RESIGN: Ha ha, why did David Vitter have to embarrass America and himself today by telling Roland Burris — another United States Senator — to resign, for ethics? Trash, both of them. Thank you to The Hill, though, for asking Vitter about the hilarious hypocrisy involved here and eliciting this response: “I honestly don’t know anybody who would compare these situations. They are dramatically different.” [The Hill]

{ 39 comments }

Serolf Divad February 24, 2009 at 3:09 pm

Pot, Kettle, pay a Louisiana whore for sex while dressed in adult diapers.

IceCreamEmpress February 24, 2009 at 3:10 pm

Vitter wore a diaper over his taint.

Mr Blifil February 24, 2009 at 3:12 pm

They are dramatically different. Vitter’s mausoleum will contain every diaper lovingly preserved, along with the embalmbed bodies of the hookers he had to snuff. Whereas Burris’ mausoleum contains only the bones of the babies he’s eaten.

Texan Bulldoggette February 24, 2009 at 3:14 pm

I think most of Vitter’s constituents would think his crimes are worse than Burris’s. Corruption/ethics that’s tiddly winks for LA pols.

Fivetree February 24, 2009 at 3:15 pm

Those who live in whore diapers should not be throwing turds.

ManchuCandidate February 24, 2009 at 3:20 pm

I truly hope that Stormy Daniels runs against Vitter.

If I was Burris, I’d be walking into Vitter’s next conference, slam a pack of Huggies on the table and yell, “Taint this, Bitch!”

tunamelt February 24, 2009 at 3:20 pm

They are dramatically different. He is not wrong.

Cicada February 24, 2009 at 3:20 pm

Every time Vitter starts grandstanding, the Dems should silently hold up packages of Pampers.

Gopherit February 24, 2009 at 3:21 pm

[re=250482]IceCreamEmpress[/re]: Fine. You win.

PrairiePossum February 24, 2009 at 3:21 pm

Vitter is fussing like a poopy pants toddler. Would someone please spank him so he shuts up?

Min February 24, 2009 at 3:21 pm

Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. And you can’t get a smaller mind than David Vitter’s.

freakishlystrong February 24, 2009 at 3:23 pm

There’s no diaper large enough to cover this asshole’s hypocrisy…

El Pinche February 24, 2009 at 3:27 pm

wow, that’s horribly hypocritical. im ashamed to be an escort-user. way to go diaper-clown.

Lionel Hutz Esq. February 24, 2009 at 3:27 pm

Vitter stated “You have to understand, I come from Louisiana where you have to be personally corrupt to hold office. Senator Burris comes from Illinois, which has a similar tradition. And yet he just bathes in the corruption of others instead of being corrupt himself. Unless he is willing to molest an intern or start having diaper sex with a prostitute, I just don’t see how he can remain a Senator.”

Fox n Fiends February 24, 2009 at 3:33 pm

vitter mein ego

Canmon (the Inadequate) February 24, 2009 at 3:34 pm

Sometimes these guys just make the snark too easy.

stew February 24, 2009 at 3:38 pm

Who’s the man who loves the whores–Diaper Dave!
Who’s the leader who poops on the floor–Diaper Dave!
Who’s the dude who gets changed every hour–Diaper Dave!
Who’s the senator whose bedding smells sour–Diaper Dave!

He’s kinda puggy…he loves his Huggies…Diaper Dave!!!

Rev. Peter Lemonjello February 24, 2009 at 3:44 pm

Sounds like someone’s bitter about not having his own McMausoleum….or, atleast not being able to list their accomplishments on said McMausoleum.

shanemacgowan February 24, 2009 at 3:44 pm

I guess Sen. Vitter (R-Nappietown) is technically correct. Had Senator Burris given then Gov. Blagojevich money to have sex with him while Sen. Burris soiled himself, the situations would have been comperable.

loudmouthredhead February 24, 2009 at 3:48 pm

[re=250511]freakishlystrong[/re]: Hypocrite’s –>/<– asshole. Close, though.
[re=250508]PrairiePossum[/re]: Don’t you see? That’s what he WANTS! Don’t do it!

loudmouthredhead February 24, 2009 at 3:49 pm

[re=250487]Mr Blifil[/re]: Nono, Vitter’s mausoleum will be built out of turd adobe of his own creation. So much less elitist than stone, fer G-d’s sake! Also.

Hooray For Anything February 24, 2009 at 3:50 pm

I’m amazed that no Republicans have wound up in the hospital lately due to all the intellectual gymnastics they’ve had to do in explaining things they say.

Mr Blifil February 24, 2009 at 3:52 pm

[re=250524]stew[/re]: That’s some urban-suburban hip-hop right there!

loudmouthredhead February 24, 2009 at 3:52 pm

[re=250533]Hooray For Anything[/re]: You can’t injure what isn’t there.

Paterlanger February 24, 2009 at 3:59 pm

I’ve got the slogan for whoever runs against Vitter in LA next time: “The longer my opponent is in office the fewer diapers are left for me to poo in!” It’s historical and topical!

Tommy Says Soooo February 24, 2009 at 4:00 pm

Vitter should buy his own damn fries.

Capitol Hillbilly February 24, 2009 at 4:16 pm

Completely different because two women haven’t killed themselves behind the Burris shenanigans.

JSDC007 February 24, 2009 at 4:17 pm

Vitter’s right.

The situations are completely different.

For one, Vitter likes to lie in his own shit; Burris, on the other hand, lies in Blagovich’s shit.

Vitter has hookers spank him and clean his poopy diapers; Burris is still lying in Blagovich’s shit.

Hooray For Anything February 24, 2009 at 4:27 pm

[re=250536]loudmouthredhead[/re]: Good point. Maybe I should just rephrase it as I’m getting hurt following all the Republicans intellectual gymnastics.

V572625694 February 24, 2009 at 4:35 pm

Okay, no one cares that Vitter patronizes prostitutes, or enjoys kinky “sex” or whatever you call that fetish of his, so long as both activities don’t involve unwilling participants (whores abused by pimps, unwitting janitors, etc.). But why the mother fuck is this man still taken seriously? Shouldn’t he be laughed out of the Capitol, and off the teevee, and out of the Official Journalistic News Papers (until they all die)? Has the US Senate now become the House of Lords, where appointments are for life?

Bruno February 24, 2009 at 4:43 pm

The thought of Vitter getting it on with someone is repulsive. However, if Burris wanted to ride Vitter, that would be entertaining. I just need to think of a name to call the video.

ManchuCandidate February 24, 2009 at 4:55 pm

[re=250594]Bruno[/re]:
Tainted Diaper Love?

bago February 24, 2009 at 5:26 pm

Always use protection before discussing the taint.

masterdebater February 24, 2009 at 5:28 pm

Pot? Kettle ?

Hedley Lamar February 24, 2009 at 5:51 pm

[re=250594]Bruno[/re]: I’d just call it the main event.

assistant/atlas February 24, 2009 at 6:09 pm

[re=250503]ManchuCandidate[/re]: OMG, I would give money to Roland Burris to make this happen.

Hell, I’d give money to Blagojevich to make this happen, which I understand may actually be more effective.

Keram2 February 24, 2009 at 8:23 pm

I love that every time Diaperman David Vitter tries to reclaim his image and move on, it generates another “Diaperman David Vitter Does X” post from Wonkette. Because someday, down the line, when Mr. Vitter dies and some poor contributing writer has to write up Diaperman’s Obit they’re going to google “David Vitter” and find a whole bunch of posts about his love of fucking in diapers. And with a smile on their face, the poor contributing writer will sneak in something like “David Vitter — called Diaperman by his friends — passed away today…” Or at least I can dream…

vespula maculata February 24, 2009 at 8:34 pm

Okay … this David Vitter guy

I mean, even if your sex life is between yourself and a paid professional, how do you imagine that first conversation between prospective client (45-50ish in a finely tailored suit) and prospective worker…

“Okay, well, what I had in mind, Cheryl -eh, can I call you Mommy?-, is um, I want to put on diapers, drop a loaf in them, and have you change me…”

Isn’t even the most experience hooker going to come back with something else first before “cash or charge…?” (” Mommy will be fine; do you want the sex before, after or during the filling of the diaper…?”)

Cape Clod February 24, 2009 at 9:00 pm

“I honestly don’t know anybody who would compare these situations. They are dramatically different.”

Thank you for tacitly admitting that you have been involved in a scandal involving prostitutes, Senator Vitter.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: