- SHUT UP AND MAKE THE GENERAL A GODDAMN PIE: Republicans tend to hate it when ladies have jobs. They should be at home, pooping out babies, because of the Bible. Sometimes they conceal this hatred, sometimes they don’t, and sometimes they don’t in official NRCC press releases: “If Nancy Pelosi’s failed economic policies are any indicator of the effect she may have on Afghanistan, taxpayers can only hope McChrystal is able to put her in her place.” These vaginers don’t understand America, and War: our government ranks military commanders over civilian commanders, duh. [NRCC via Matt Yglesias]
Read More:
- NRCC Claims That Barry And Nancy Will Radically Steal Your Freedom Trinkets
- "Disgusting" DCCC Video: Dems Favor Windfarms, Asian Babies, Third Term for Bill Clinton
- Relive Magic Sex Creep Herman Cain Calling Nancy Pelosi 'Princess'
- Nancy Pelosi Doesn't Understand Why John Boehner Cries So Much
- Daily Briefing: The Plan
{ 37 comments }
smack my bitch up!
I always figured that the Taliban was onto something with their burqas, public executions of women who were raped, and refusal to allow women outside of their homes without a male escort from the immediate family. This is the platform the RNCC needs to adopt, formally.
“If Nancy Pelosi’s failed economic policies are any indicator of the effect she may have on Afghanistan, taxpayers can only hope McChrystal is able to put her in her place.” Not only is that sexist but it makes no fucking sense at all to anyone with half a brain. Guess the GOP know their base well.
That’s right, bitches. Get in the kitchen, make my dinner, and I hope you like callouses on the soles of your feet cause you’ll be barefoot for the rest of your life.
[re=428061]AnnieGetYourFun[/re]:
Isn’t that already SOP (standard operating procedure) for the majority of American “Christ-centered” marriages?
At least when Miss Pelosi calls her staff and asks them what the hell happened the day before they’re not too drunk to answer her question. Or so I’m told.
I knew there would be trouble, once I saw that Nancy was wearing shoes.
Let’s not focus on just the sexism, either — that wouldn’t be fair to the completely invalid deduction. It would be like saying if John McCain’s horrible flying record is any indication of his ability to govern, he would be the worst president ever. Or if John Boehner’s ability to pull off a realistic tan is any indication, any healthcare bill he favors will result in the deaths of millions of innocents.
[re=428069]Reefpilot[/re]: Fewer burqas, more Mom Jeans.
Hahaha….these guys are so funny. They’ll have to learn like my grandfather…..with the cold steel of a butcher knife against their testes waking them up at 3 in the morning.
But the NRCC can’t be sexist; after all, they were always quick to attack any sexism directed at Sarah Palin, even when it was only imaginary! Why, if they were actually sexist than that would make them hypocrites who were only alleging sexism for political… oh, wait.
As a vaginer (thanks for the term BTW) I would have to agree. We are incapable of rational thought and burst into tears with the least provocation. Our days center around fixing meals, pleasing our men and, squirting out babies and we don’t have time or the ability to understand such complex tasks as ‘economies’ and ‘global thermo-nuclear war’.
So, would you like apple or cherry? *takes off shoes and gets on knees*
[re=428073]SayItWithWookies[/re]:
Or if Chewbacca fleen bar doop doop doop, noun verb Democrats are BAD!!!!!
Perhaps if Obama were to bring back McChrystal Pepsi®, Pelosi wouldn’t be so hysterical.
A woman can only survive on a diet of Zima® and Eve Ultralight Menthol 120s® for so long, you know.
[re=428089]Tommmcatt[/re]: “Noun, verb, Pelosi” is one of the alternatives to “noun, verb, ACORN”.
Don’t get me started on the one in the Pant-Suit.
[re=428086]labdork[/re]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjxY9rZwNGU
It’s a good thing vaginers are not allowed to be real generals. That would be an embarassing catastophe.
It would be even better to not allow vaginers to be pretend generals in charge of procurements or the secretarial pool either.
I’m an optimistic retard but I think there might actually be some ramifications for the Republicans here. This wasn’t just any rightwing rag, this was an official NRCC release. You’ve got the sexism which you pretty much expect but to hope a general puts the Speaker in her place is beyond the fucking pale. And I’m a southern non-vagina having veteran. This pisses me off more than any of their shit has in a long time. And that’s saying a lot. I hope to hell Nancy will pull some serious mafia style revenge here.
And I am sure the PUMAs will be all over this.
I am just giggling for other reasons.
Quoting the NRCC’s own communications director as a source in an NRCC press release is a weird, losery, high-school-yearbooky thing to do.
It’s just like that time when, rather than listening to four-star general Eric Shinseki’s assessments on Iraq, General Bush somehow believed he was better suited to craft our country’s military policy, simply because he was a woman.
I’m just curious, if Nancy’s gonna be put in her place because she’s got a ‘gina then what’s the GOP’s excuse (see Wolfie/Rummie shitting on Shinseki when he asked for 500K for Afghanistan, etc)?
I’m guessing small/no ball syndrome.
Shelly = Pelosi
http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/149827
okay so it’s another misunderstanding, right? what the nerks really mean is that if pelosi’s failed economic policies, which are not demonstrated in this argument and so exist strictly as hypotheticals, are any indicator of any sort (good, bad, machts nichts) of the effect she may personally have in any fashion on an impoverished landlocked nation on the other side of the planet, then taxpayers of an unspecified nature in an unspecified location have only one hope, and that is that the high-ranking general commanding the foreign military forces in that heretofore mentioned landlocked nation on the other side of the planet will in some way have some sort of ability to put her in an unspecified place possibly more appropriate to her skills and interests, which may or may not be, just for instance and at random, queen of the fucking universe.
glad to help clear that up. next question?
[re=428081]Gopherit[/re]: Learn like your grandfather? Oh DO TELL.
Speaking of vaginers, OT question: the UK tabloids call Madonna “Madge.” If her name was Vadonna, would they call her Vadge?
Please McChrystal, don’t hurt ‘em.
FUCK the NRCC.
Gosh, that felt good.
[re=428161]hobospacejunkie[/re]:
They do already, most of them.
When will the men of the NRCC get back “in their places”… their wetsuits with built-in dildos?
So, a vagineer is a guy who really really likes cunnilingus. And an Imagineer Vagineer is the guy who was quietly fired from animating Snow White?
I, for one, welcome the idea of a Member of the House of Representatives with zero military experience; the intelligence of a Galileo High School, S.F. dropout; the moral integrity of a South of Market Street transvestite hooker; and a plastic surgery job that makes Greta’s look good . . .
. . . lecturing a full General of the United States Army on military strategy and tactics.
No wonder we’re losing in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, San Francisco . . . .
In the words of Kinky Friedman “get your biscuits in the oven and your buns into bed.”
[re=428324]Neilist[/re]:
Bt “we,” I take it, you mean the RNCC?
[re=428324]Neilist[/re]: Fuck you, you flew-infested swine. Also.
So, what does this dick think about our Commander-in-Chief, you know, running the war, and shit? When is that non-militarized negro going to ‘learn his place’?
Yes, flew, not flu, you vile, little pig.
Comments on this entry are closed.