SECRETS OF THE LITERARY MAGAZINES: “All in all, you get a glimpse of what succeeds online: masturbating priests, Matt Stone’s potty mouth, Sarah Palin’s gargantuan lies, taking a moment to make sense of Sarah Palin’s gargantuan lies, Chris Wallace’s fellatial non-journalism, shit-faced Brits, and stoned parents.” [Andrew Sullivan's Atlantic Monthly]
Read More:
- Breitbart-Palin Mob's Next Target: Andrew Sullivan
- Evil Obama Now Firing People For Acting Semi-Human
- Happy Tenth Birthday, Andrew Sullivan's Blog!
- Andrew Sullivan's Penis-Shaped Statistics Give Wingnut 'Anger Tingles'
- NAACP Going To Call Teabaggers Racist But Teabagger Leaders Don't Understand Because They Are Basically the New Civil Rights Movement
{ 20 comments }
What also succeeds is a commentless blog run by a disingenuous, tedious farmer of other people’s insights who inexplicably gets linked to by everybody.
Linkie not workie.
Also, The Daily Show’s Best Sarah Palin Moments of 2009:
http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/16/the-daily-shows-best-sarah-palin-moments-of-2009
Posted with hope for some clicky-link reimbursement from viacom to teh wonket, of course…
[re=486926]FlownOver[/re]: Try http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/12/top-ten-posts-of-the-year-by-traffic.html
Leave twits alone!!!
What does not succeed online: blank pages.
From that quote, Sullivan is wrong, because no one can make sense of Sarah Palin’s lies.
The priest should really have a crack pipe in his mouth too.
The link was a Christmas link; i.e., no l. Here’s the new, post-Christmas reality.
Well, how else are they going to make purity bricks?
“fellatial non-journalism”
Wow. He do have a way with da words.
After seeing the actual post, Andrew, there’s a major error in your summary; as you yourself noted in the original post you linked to, the problem with the priest in that image is not that he’s masturbating but much worse.
[re=486930]memzilla[/re]: Much gratitude. May the New Orbit bring you kilos of artificially-induced euphoria.
Whoever came up with that graphic needs to be smacked. Or kissed. I can’t decide.
And no one tell Andrew that 90% of that traffic is due to John Cole linking to him and saying (essentially): Can you believe this guy? WTF is wrong with him?
[re=486956]Hunger Tallest Palin[/re]: That graphic reminds me of a Defense Pistol Target.
I mean, if you were going to “aim for the center of mass” with me, you’d be right on target.
Or maybe if you were shooting to disable a Nigerian Crotch Bomber.
Whatever.
I think he says that priest-getting-a-BJ-from-a-boy logo was from 1974, which was a terrific time to be Catholic kid, as I was.
No, wait wait wait … that really came out wrong.
I was talking about the whole love-thy-neighbor, Jesus-talkin’ ecumenism of Vatican II, the Saturnight folk masses singing songs by the Byrds and other filthy hippies, mainstream white Catholic families adopting orphans from Ethiopia or the inner city, Operation Rice Bowl in full swing, and long-haired priests who played guitar and didn’t get the underage BJ’s.
Those guys came later, in my parish. They always had teh square, uptight demeanor and crew cuts and you tell something was off about them from the get-go.
Andrew Sullivan blowing a 12 ft tall priest would draw HUGE traffic.
[re=487037]Lascauxcaveman[/re]: Don’t forget the swingin’ weekends! http://www.wwmecanada.org/meicon.jpg
The best explaination of how real life works since forty two.
Fox News is fellatial journalism, Thank you Andrew Sullivan
Comments on this entry are closed.