<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<!---->
    <title>Wonkette</title>
    <link>http://www.wonkette.com/</link>
    <description>Politics for People with Dirty Minds</description>
    <copyright>Copyright 2006 Gawker Media, LLC.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:12:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 
        <item>
        <title>It's Okay, Di Fi, We Like Phantom Planet Too</title>
        <description><p>This just in, courtesy of a tipster:</p>

<blockquote>During Judiciary Committee Mark-up this morning, Dianne Feinstein&#8217;s cellphone went off while she was giving her statement on comprehensive immigration reform.

<p>Her ringtone?  &#8220;California,&#8221; the theme from &#8220;The <span class="caps">OC.</span>&#8221;</p>

Oh, and the funniest part was that she didn&#8217;t notice her phone ringing, despite Sen. Durbin&#8217;s effort to point it out to her!</blockquote>

<p>This is not entirely surprising. While Di-Fi is certainly one of the most well-spoken &#8212; and well-dressed &#8212; members of the Judiciary Committee, she can be a bit of a space cadet at times.</p>

<p>But there is an irony in Sen. Feinstein discussing immigration reform to the tune of a song with these lyrics:</p>

<blockquote>We&#8217;ve be on the run<br />Driving in the sun<br />Looking out for number one<br />California, here we come </blockquote>

<p>Here they come, indeed.</p>

<p><strong>Earlier</strong>: <a href="http://www.wonkette.com/politics/dc/senatorial-lessons-in-cell-phone-etiquette-111536.php">Senatorial Lessons in Cell Phone Etiquette</a></p>
&nbsp;<br /><a href="http://www.wonkette.com/politics/dianne-feinstein/its-okay-di-fi-we-like-phantom-planet-too-158075.php">Comment on this post</a></description>
        <link>http://www.wonkette.com/politics/dianne-feinstein/its-okay-di-fi-we-like-phantom-planet-too-158075.php</link>
        <guid>http://www.wonkette.com/politics/dianne-feinstein/its-okay-di-fi-we-like-phantom-planet-too-158075.php</guid>
        <category>dianne feinstein</category>
        
        <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:12:24 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
        <item>
        <title>John Kerry's Last Stand: The Alito Filibuster Backstory</title>
        <description><p>
Last week, when Senator John F. Kerry issued a vocal call for a filibuster of Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito, Jr. &#8212; going so far as to <a href="http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/1/26/192843/363">blog about it</a> &#8212; many Democrats and Republicans had the same reaction: &#8220;What the hell is he thinking?&#8221; The fact that Senator Kerry issued this clarion call to arms <em>from Switzerland</em>, of all places, didn&#8217;t exactly help. As White House press secretary Scott McClellan <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/27/AR2006012701405.html">put it</a>, &#8220;Even for a senator, it takes some pretty serious yodeling to call for a filibuster from a five-star ski resort in the Swiss Alps.&#8221; As the New York Times aptly <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/27/politics/politicsspecial1/27alito.html">summarized</a> matters, &#8220;Democrats cringed and Republicans jeered at the awkwardness of his gesture, which almost no one in the Senate expects to succeed.&#8221;</p>

<p>After the Alito cloture vote this afternoon, this will all be nothing more than an embarrassing memory. But, since we had nothing better to do with our weekend, we did some poking around into what might have been running through John Kerry&#8217;s elongated head.</p>

<p>The rumor going around in Judiciary Committee circles late last week was that Senator Kerry&#8217;s decision to filibuster was staff-driven. Speculation focused in one staff member in particular: <a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/features/beclerk.html">Mirah Horowitz</a>, one of Kerry&#8217;s chief legal advisors. Horowitz is a liberal lawyer and blonde braniac who previously clerked for Justice Stephen Breyer, before joining a decidedly less successful enterprise &#8212; the Kerry presidential campaign.</p>

<p>Was there any truth to this rumor of Mirah Horowitz exercising excessive influence over John Kerry? Details after the jump.</p>
<p>First things first: What does this Mirah Horowitz character look like? We&#8217;ve helpfully supplied a picture of her, so you can judge for yourself. She strikes us as the blonde version of the <a href="http://www.washingtoniennearchive.blogspot.com/">Washingtonienne</a>, <a href="http://www.jessicacutleronline.com/">Jessica Cutler</a> (but <em>with </em>a Supreme Court clerkship, and <em>without </em>that whole anal-sex-for-cash business).</p>

<p>And how accurate was this rumor of Mirah Horowitz as Lady Macbeth, inciting John Kerry to filibuster by stoking his 2008 ambitions? As you might imagine, this dramatic scenario got us quite excited here at Wonkette. It&#8217;s been a long time since <a href="http://www.dancingmonica.com/monicalewinsky.htm">an attractive young woman</a> altered the course of political history!</p>

<p>Alas, as is so often the case, reality is less than exciting than rumor. Sources in the Kerry camp report that although Horowitz does play a major role in advising Senator Kerry on matters pertaining to the judiciary, including drafting and reviewing many of his <span class="caps">SCOTUS</span>-related speeches, the decision to charge the Alito windmill was Kerry&#8217;s own. In fact, it was less staff-driven than most of his decisions, since Kerry was away from Washington when he made it. It was far more influenced by overseas telephone conversations he had with fellow Democratic senators, most notably, Senator Ted Kennedy (who also, by the way, receives occasional advice from Horowitz on judicial matters).</p>

<p>In the end, learning that the Alito filibuster was John Kerry&#8217;s brilliant idea really isn&#8217;t that surprising to us. It reflects the same shrewd political judgment and unerring strategic insight that Senator Kerry displayed in running his 2004 presidential campaign.</p>

<p>Okay, so maybe Mirah Horowitz can&#8217;t singlehandedly cause a senator to filibuster a <span class="caps">SCOTUS </span>nominee. But we hear she can do something that, to ex-New Yorkers like ourselves, is equally Mirah-culous. She can get you tickets to <a href="http://www.montypythonsspamalot.com/">Spamalot</a>! (Her father, <a href="http://www.playbill.com/celebritybuzz/whoswho/biography/13151">Dr. Lawrence Horowitz</a>, is a producer of the show.)</p>

<p><a href="http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/1/26/192843/363">Filibuster Alito</a> [Daily Kos]</p>

<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/27/AR2006012701405.html">Kerry Defends Senate Filibuster on Alito as &#8216;a Vote of History&#8217;</a> [Washington Post]</p>

<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/27/politics/politicsspecial1/27alito.html">Kerry Gets Cool Response to Call to Filibuster Alito</a> [New York Times]</p>

<p><strong>Earlier:</strong> <a href="http://www.wonkette.com/politics/samuel-alito/the-dems-vs-alito-lets-hold-hands-and-jump-151112.php">The Dems vs. Alito: Let&#8217;s Hold Hands and Jump</a><br /><a href="http://www.wonkette.com/politics/samuel-alito/kerry-takes-action-kinda-151006.php">Kerry Takes Action&#8230; Kinda</a></br></p></description>
        <link>http://www.wonkette.com/politics/john-f-kerry/john-kerrys-last-stand-the-alito-filibuster-backstory-151434.php</link>
        <guid>http://www.wonkette.com/politics/john-f-kerry/john-kerrys-last-stand-the-alito-filibuster-backstory-151434.php</guid>
        <category>john f. kerry</category>
        
        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:14:51 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
        <item>
        <title>Daily Briefing, Part I: Alito's 'Soporific Effect'</title>
        <description><p><b>&bull;</b>   <b>Samuel Alito</b> vows to keep "open mind" on abortion; distances himself from past statements.  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011000198.html">WP</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/11/politics/politicsspecial1/11confirm.html">NYT</a>, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB113689963405842625.html">WSJ</a>, <a href="http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060110-115652-1035r.htm">WT</a>, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-alito11jan11,0,3605667.story">LAT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Alito</b> was an "elusive target" who seemed "mostly untouchable."  <b>Alito</b>'s "handling of questions from Democrats had the effect of leaving his questioner shuffling through papers in search of the next question."  [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/11/politics/politicsspecial1/11alito.html">NYT</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001894.html">WP</a>, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20060111/a_alito11.art.htm">USAT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Alito</b> had a "soporific effect": "the mood in the hearing room was flat and lethargic."  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001560.html">WP</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Alito</b> insists he will maintain the status quo.  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001568.html">WP</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Alito</b> "sticks to the big picture" as Dems "cast wide net."  [<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20060111/a_alitoanalysis11.art.htm">USAT</a>, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-assess11jan11,0,3449354.story">LAT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   Judiciary Committee members indulged themselves.  [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/11/politics/politicsspecial1/11senators.html">NYT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Alito</b> defends ruling on Vanguard.  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001533.html">WP</a>]</p>
</description>
        <link>http://www.wonkette.com/politics/samuel-alito/daily-briefing-part-i-alitos-soporific-effect-147870.php</link>
        <guid>http://www.wonkette.com/politics/samuel-alito/daily-briefing-part-i-alitos-soporific-effect-147870.php</guid>
        <category>samuel alito</category>
        
        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:26:50 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
        <item>
        <title>Daily Briefing: 'So Vicious and So Vitriolic'</title>
        <description><p><b>&bull;</b>   Attorneys for Republican senators on the Judiciary Committee express "uniform disappointment" with <b>Miers</b> and are "pushing back against her."  Said one lawyer, "Everybody is hoping that something will happen on <b>Miers</b>, either that the president would withdraw her or she would realize she is not up to it and pull out while she has some dignity intact."  [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/12/politics/politicsspecial1/12confirm.html">NYT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Dobson</b> says <b>Rove</b> assured him that <b>Miers</b> is a conservative evangelical Christian, though Roe v. Wade "was never part of our discussion"; <b>Rove</b> reportedly explained that alternative candidates removed their names "because the process has become so vicious and so vitriolic and so bitter."  [<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-miers12oct12,1,2100707.story?coll=la-headlines-politics">LAT</a>, <a href="http://www.washtimes.com/national/20051011-115020-4053r.htm">WT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Judith Miller</b> will testify for a second day today; prosecutors are investigating earlier conversations between administration officials and journalists.  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/11/AR2005101101606.html">WP</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/12/politics/12leak.html">NYT</a>, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB112907415441266084-email.html">WSJ</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Laura</b> says criticisms of <b>Miers</b> might be sexist.  <b>William Kristol</b>: "It is striking to me they are spending less time explaining the merits of <b>Harriet Miers</b> and more time. . . using liberal talking points to criticize the critics. I think it is going to backfire."  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/11/AR2005101100456.html">WP</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/12/politics/politicsspecial1/12miers.html">NYT</a>, <a href="http://www.washtimes.com/national/20051011-115346-6780r.htm">WT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   White House strategy shifts focus to <b>Miers</b>' religious credibility.  [<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20051012/a_marketingmiers12.art.htm">USAT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Bush</b> in New Orleans: "Out of this rubble is going to come some good; out of the devastation is going to come new cities and new hope."  [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/12/national/nationalspecial/12bush.html">NYT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Milbank</b> on <b>Bush</b>'s "Today" interview: "The president was a blur of blinks, taps, jiggles, pivots and shifts. <b>Bush</b> has always been an active man, but standing with <b>Lauer</b> and the serene, steady first lady, he had the body language of a man wishing urgently to be elsewhere."  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/11/AR2005101101577.html">WP</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>DeLay</b> remains a go-to, agenda-setting congressman.  [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/12/politics/12delay.html">NYT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>McCain</b> advances his own agenda ahead of the White House and the Republican leadership.  <b>McCain</b>: "Do I want to be president? Sure. Do I want to run for president? That's the question."  [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB112907638428966130-email.html">WSJ</a>]</p>
<p><b>&bull;</b>   Senators <b>Gregg</b> and <b>Kennedy</b> propose that a new federal agency with a cabinet-level czar coordinate the reconstruction of the Gulf Coast.  [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB112907425709466087-email.html">WSJ</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Negroponte</b> takes "extraordinary step" by posting 6,000-word letter from <b>Ayman al-Zawahiri</b>, a top al Qaeda leader, on its website.  [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/12/international/middleeast/12intel.html">NYT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   Supreme Court will decide on legal limits of the Clean Water Act.  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/11/AR2005101101647.html">WP</a>, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB112904001701665557-email.html">WSJ</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/12/politics/12scotus.html">NYT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Bush</b>'s tax advisory panel will "recommend limits in the popular tax deductions for mortgage interest and employer-provided health insurance."  [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/12/politics/12tax.html">NYT</a>, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB112905328016365735-email.html">WSJ</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Miers</b> acknowledged her admiration of <b>Warren Burger</b>, though the wording of the conversation is up in the air.  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/11/AR2005101101804.html">WP</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   Ethics experts are skeptical that <b>Frist</b> could avoid conflicts of interests concerning health stocks.  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/11/AR2005101101576.html">WP</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Howard Kurtz</b>: "The newsgathering mission of the Times. . . has collided with the understandably human need to protect its reporter. In such a circumstance, the journalism must come first."  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/12/AR2005101200350.html">WP</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Earle</b> refuses subpoena from <b>DeLay</b>'s defense team.  [<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-delay12oct12,1,5845444.story?coll=la-headlines-politics">LAT</a>]<br />
<b>&bull;</b>   <b>Clinton</b> will fundraise for Virginia gubernatorial candidate <b>Timothy Kaine</b>.  [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/11/AR2005101100878.html">WP</a>]</p></description>
        <link>http://www.wonkette.com/politics/scotus/daily-briefing-so-vicious-and-so-vitriolic-130470.php</link>
        <guid>http://www.wonkette.com/politics/scotus/daily-briefing-so-vicious-and-so-vitriolic-130470.php</guid>
        <category>SCOTUS</category>
        
        <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:13:14 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    
</channel>
</rss>