SCOTUS
How Can Amy Coney Barrett F*ck It Up Today? Liveblogging Day Three!
Yes, we have to do this again.
October 14, 2020 09:07 AM
What can we say about the first day of the Amy Coney Barrett hearings?
Well!
She can't answer any of your questions, because that would be improper, even when the question is "Should there be a peaceful transfer of power?" Will she recuse herself from any election-related cases, since she's only being fast-tracked to help steal Donald Trump the election? She can't say. Will she kill Obamacare and hurt millions of people? She's not telling. Will she fuck over people who have a "sexual preference" that is LGBT, because that is literally what she said? She can't say.
She can't say what she really thinks about Roe, even though we all know what she thinks about Roe. (It's just a precedent, but not a SUPER DUPER precedent, which would mean she'd have to respect it.) Is abortion a constitutional right? Well, these cases say it is, not that Amy Comet Ping-Ping is endorsing these cases. She's an originalist, except for when "original" doesn't comport with her personal bigoted feelings.
And so forth. She's a real asshat. Read yesterday's liveblog to catch up!
Today the senators will each have another 20 minutes to ask questions. And we're liveblogging it again! But as a treat afterward, we are VOTING AGAINST THESE FUCKERS TODAY.
Have you made your voting plan? Make your voting plan while you watch this garbage, which should give you more motivation to make your voting plan, to get rid of all the fuckers who made this happen.
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-youtube">
<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="a834113356b38ba8b2705392835bfcb1"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/UgGxw9PlKtw?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
<small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Live: Amy Coney Barrett Senate Confirmation Hearings | Day 3 | NBC News</small>
<small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgGxw9PlKtw" target="_blank">www.youtube.com</a>
</small>
</p><p><strong>9:04:</strong> As we begin today, Lindsey Graham is whining about Kamala Harris's questioning of ACB last night, which was awesome. Graham is upset that Harris was just TOO MEAN to ACB. <br></p><p>Also he says ACB is going to shatter barriers for conservative (white) women and that he's never been more proud of any nominee than he is of ACB. </p><p>Fuck off and go lose a Senate seat, Lindsey. </p><p><strong>9:12:</strong> Lindsey Graham says it is not ACB's fault the group who created the statement she signed about abortion being "barbaric" also thinks <em>in vitro </em>fertilization should be criminalized. All she did was endorse the group, by signing their thing! Gosh, you guys, what are you all being so unfair about?</p><p><strong>9:23:</strong> Lindsey concludes by saying he's just really glad all the little wingnut girls will finally have a grown wingnut lady to look up to, somebody who shows that you can be a white bigot lady who achieves great things, yadda yadda. Guess all those videos of Karens fucking up Walmarts and asking to see the manager weren't enough. <br></p><p>Feinstein now. </p><p><strong>9:27:</strong> Feinstein is VERY IMPRESSED with ACB's explanation of "severability," five gold stars and no abortions awarded! She says it is like a Jenga game -- if you pull these parts out of a law, will it still stand, or will it fall down and everybody will be like "WHOAAAA ALL FALL DOWN"? <br></p><p><strong>9:29:</strong> FEINSTEIN: Is Medicare constitutional? Some idiot says it's not.<br></p><p>ACB: I don't know! Just like I don't know if Donald Trump can unilaterally move the election!</p><p>FEINSTEIN: Cut the clip, MSNBC.</p><p><strong>9:32:</strong> FEINSTEIN: Whaddya think of the Voting Rights Act? Your dead pal Scalia didn't like it.<br></p><p>ACB: We're not THE SAME PERSON. I think it was pretty good, for the Civil Rights Movement. But I can't really say things about it, because I am not allowed to say things, because <em>Shelby County v. Holder </em>has been "controversial," and I can't talk about things that are "controversial." </p><p><strong>9:40:</strong> FEINSTEIN: Will you rule based on the Constitution, or on what you think Jesus is whispering in your ear? <br></p><p>ACB: Jesus he knows me and he knows I'm right, been talkin' to Jesus all my life.</p><p>(ACB is giving an explanation of when <em>stare decisis </em>matters and what it doesn't. She says her writings on the subject have been taken out of context.)</p><p>And Feinstein finishes by welcoming ACB's giant-ass family again.</p><p>Time for Chuck Grassley, who somehow was a better Judiciary chair than Lindsey Graham, that's how much Lindsey Graham sucks. </p><p><strong>9:46:</strong> Grassley says it's time to GET REAL, no more APPLESAUCE! Democrats are doing a charade, because they don't even care about Obamacare! They just want to do Medicare for All, even though Joe Biden did not run on that! <br></p><p>Speaking of, Grassley had some advice for Trump yesterday, and it was in English:</p><p><strong>9:48:</strong> Here is Lindsey Graham referring to the "good old days of segregation." He was trying to be sarcastic, but we'd hate for the Lincoln Project to cut it into an ad out of context, considering how Jaime Harrison is really close to beating him on November 3.<br></p><div id="e9986" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="7678a046d403183c3e477b01bd788be5"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1316371707985190912" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Lindsay Graham just said, “You’re not aware of any effort to go back to the good old days of segregation by a legis… https://t.co/dN208BYG46</div> — Shannon Watts (@Shannon Watts)<a href="https://twitter.com/shannonrwatts/statuses/1316371707985190912">1602682446.0</a></blockquote></div><p><strong>9:58:</strong> Today would be a good day for Democrats to stop talking about detailed crap about how ACB might or might not rule on Obamacare, and just to loudly start yelling "THIS IS ALL BULLSHIT." <br></p><p><strong>10:04:</strong> ACB has not heard about all this voter disenfranchisement and how they've been removing polling places and the long lines in predominantly Black areas, and if that relates to the Voting Rights Act, she can't comment on it, because it's a case. Judges are not allowed to talk about things that are cases. <br></p><p>PAT LEAHY: Can you even say that people of color face more trouble voting than anybody else?</p><p>ACB: I cannot say a thing.</p><p><strong>10:06:</strong> LEAHY: I understand not commenting on ongoing cases, but judges don't have to IGNORE REALITY. <br></p><p><strong>10:07:</strong> LEAHY: Do presidents have to obey the Supreme Court or can they just say fuck off?<br></p><p>ACB: I know Trump's other nominees said no man is above the law, but it's not like SCOTUS can do anything about it if they say fuck off. But if somebody else wants to enforce SCOTUS's rulings, I guess that's cool. </p><p><strong>10:12:</strong> LEAHY: If you're such an "originalist," why do you think the framers put the Emoluments Clause in there?<br></p><p>ACB: To prevent foreign influence on presidents, not that I can say anything about that as it relates to Donald Trump, that would be improper. Because it is under litigation! Somewhere!</p><p><strong>10:16:</strong> ACB says it is totally OK to overrule precedent sometimes, and to give some examples, she is going to list some really good liberal opinions like <em>Lawrence v. Texas</em>, in order to weasel you into thinking maybe ACB thinks those liberal opinions are good and she doesn't want to overturn them.</p><p>Now we have John Cornyn, so the next 20 minutes will be an absolute waste. He wants to "wax philosophical" with ACB for a few minutes. </p><p><strong>10:21:</strong> Cornyn is bitching that there was not "consensus" on Obamacare, without mentioning that the GOP has become a racist authoritarian obstructionist piece of shit un-American party with which there can never been "consensus," and it's been that way since Barack Obama was elected. <br></p><p>In other words, go fuck yourself, John Cornyn. </p><p><strong>10:41:</strong> As we said, Cornyn was boring.<br></p><p>In other news, Amy Coney Barrett is unable to say whether the president has the right to unilaterally deny a person of a certain race the vote, because that is a "hypothetical."</p><p>Christ, what an asshole. </p><p><strong>10:53:</strong> Oh boy, we are just really rehashing all of yesterday, aren't we? Democrats: Today should not feel like <em>deja vu</em>. <br></p><p>In case you missed Kamala Harris last night, it was awesome. She spoke directly to the American people for like the first 10 minutes before then hammering the shit out of that asshole. Yes, she is running for vice president, so that is why she talked directly to America, but that doesn't mean the other senators can't do that too.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-youtube">
<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="09b9aef9b12b35d6f62f1f911ca6c9c2"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/j7hUb0uH6DM?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
<small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">WATCH: Sen. Kamala Harris questions Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett</small>
<small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7hUb0uH6DM" target="_blank">www.youtube.com</a>
</small>
</p><p><strong>10:57:</strong> Oh good, it is time for Mike Lee again. Yesterday, he whined about how NINE IS THE ONLY NUMBER OF JUDGES THAT IS GOOD, NINE, NOT ELEVEN, JUST NINE!<br></p><p>Today he wants to talk about religious freedom, because he is a Mormon, and he is persecuted. Indeed, Amy Comey Barrett probably thinks he is going to hell. Likewise, Mike Lee probably thinks Amy Coney Barrett isn't even getting her own planet to rule over when she dies. </p><p>What a pickle.</p><p><strong>11:07:</strong> Mike Lee's parlor trick today is to show a few times Amy Coney Barrett was <a href="http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2018/D06-25/C:17-3163:J:PerCuriam:aut:T:npDp:N:2176287:S:0" target="_blank">presented with anti-abortion cases</a> SO STUPID she was required to rule on the side of the Constitution and sanity, in order to prove she is not BIASSSSS.<br></p><p>It is not a very good parlor trick. </p><p><strong>11:16:</strong> Sheldon Whitehouse is back to talk about dark money Federalist Society judicial incest that made ACB the nominee. He's doing this right after Mike Lee finished with some dumb crap about how nice ACB is to her law clerks. <br></p><p><strong>11:18:</strong> WHITEHOUSE: Brett Kavanaugh was under an ethics investigation when he was nominated to SCOTUS, and that stopped the investigation. You under any investigations like he was? Because he is a well-known BAD ETHICS guy.<br></p><p>ACB: I don't think so! </p><p>Whitehouse is such a dick, he just did that for fun. </p><p><strong>11:20:</strong> WHITEHOUSE: The Supreme Court doesn't have the same ethics standards as lower courts, and has the lowest requirements for disclosing emoluments. That's fucked up. You wanna fix that when you go to the Court, or are you a bad ethics and emoluments lady?<br></p><p>GRAHAM: Actually I like this question, sort of. How do you feel about that?</p><p>ACB: I am very good at ethics and emoluments! </p><p><strong>11:30:</strong> Whitehouse's questioning is long and winding, but it's about dark money, anti-union groups going through the courts at their own specifically chosen paces, literally picking and choosing the composition of the Court they want. Sometimes they wait until somebody dies and Donald Trump can make a replacement, sometimes they literally go into court and ask them to dismiss their case, because the Supreme Court isn't <em>just right</em>. <br></p><p>Interesting discussion. </p><p><strong>11:33:</strong> WHITEHOUSE: Do you meet with people who submit <em>amicus </em>briefs while cases are going? Is it possible to not even know who REALLY submitted or funded an <em>amicus</em> brief? These are all really easy yes or no questions that you can totally answer.<br></p><p>(He is still doing his master class on dark money influencing the Court, like we said.)</p><p><strong>11:37:</strong> Oh good, it is time for Ted Cruz to jerk off into soup cans. He says it is "good news" that ACB is going to be confirmed, because the Democrats haven't even asked any questions about her record. He says Democrats only have "political attacks." <br></p><p>Hey, so, in Memphis where we live, today is the first day of early voting, and we are seeing pictures on Facebook of early voting lines like we have NEVER SEEN BEFORE. Because ACB might not be able to answer questions, but the American voters sure are. Just thought you might like to know that.</p><p>Cruz now whining that the Democrats aren't even here for the hearing. Dick Durbin is like fuck you, all you Republicans have COVID, they're in their offices.</p><p>Also we'd note that this is a sham and we're going to be lobbying for Congress to add seats to the court starting November 4, if Kavanaugh and Barrett don't GTFO.</p><p><strong>11:41:</strong> Cruz GOTCHAS that Obamacare premiums have gone way up, without mentioning that they've gone up because the GOP has been skullfucking Obamacare and chipping away at it ever since it went into effect, which has had the intended result of making premiums go up, because when Republicans can't win by winning, they win by ratfucking things.<br></p><p><strong>11:43: </strong>LOL Ted Cruz DUMBOTCRATS LITRALLY WANT CHARLES MANSON TO VOTE!<br></p><p><strong>11:46:</strong> CRUZ: Does the Federalist Society even give you orders?<br></p><p>ACB: No, they launder their orders through other cut-out groups.</p><p>HAHAHAHA, she did not say that, that would be far more forthcoming than conservatives are willing to be. </p><p><strong>11:49:</strong> Ted Cruz says Democrats are the REAL dark money, and to prove it, he is showing that some judge who likes Planned Parenthood made some political donations in the past. Mmhmm. <br></p><p><strong>11:50:</strong> The point is that Ted Cruz, just like yesterday, is more concerned about Sheldon Whitehouse being mean to the Federalist Society than he is about even talking to Amy Coney Barrett. Does Whitehouse have a game going in his office to see how well he can laser pointer Ted Cruz off a cliff? <br></p><p><strong>11:52:</strong> LOL Ted Cruz "school choice" -- an issue that is on no real civil rights organization's agenda, because real civil rights organizations aren't about destroying public schools for all kids so that corporations and churches can take over schooling -- "is the civil rights issue of the next century." <br></p><p>Love it when white racist Republicans talk about what is the civil rights issue of the next century. </p><p><strong>11:55:</strong> And now Cruz is going to jerk off in soup cans by whining about so-called "court-packing." Whine whine whine whine whine. <br></p><p>As if the GOP hasn't spent the Trump administration packing the courts with 24-year-old Westboro Baptist protesters, because Mitch McConnell created all these vacancies for Trump by refusing to give Obama's nominees hearings. </p><p>Shouldn't Ted be off somewhere failing to defend his wife from <a href="https://www.wonkette.com/donald-trump-rules-out-banging-ted-cruzs-uggo-wife-ew-yuck" target="_blank">Trump calling her ugly?</a> </p><p>BREAK TIME THANK GOD.</p><p><strong>12:32:</strong> And we are back! Amy Klobuchar begins by reminding everyone that this is bullshit.<br></p><p><strong>12:38:</strong> Klobuchar reminds us again that we already know who this nominee is and what she hates:<br></p><p>HATES: Obamacare.</p><p>LOVES: Killing Obamacare.</p><p>HATES: <em>Roe</em>.</p><p>LOVES: Killing <em>Roe</em>.</p><p>HATES: marriage laws that let any old person with a "sexual preference" she doesn't like get married.</p><p>LOVES: killing <em>Obergefell</em> probably.</p><p>But ACB just insisted again she has no ANIMUS toward Obamacare! Scouts honor, officer!</p><p><strong>12:42:</strong> Klobuchar is not buying that ACB was not literally auditioning for the Supreme Court when she wrote several years ago a veritable screed against Obamacare.<br></p><p>KLOBUCHAR: Hey, didn't you ALSO write that it's bad when people litigate things in the Court because they keep losing them legislatively "fair and square"? </p><p>ACB: I did.</p><p>KLOBUCHAR: Well, these Republicans have tried to repeal Obamacare 70 times. So ... </p><p><strong>12:47:</strong> KLOBUCHAR: Hey, don't you think that if you have THREE JUSTICES on the Court nominated by Trump, if there is election litigation, especially in light of what happened in <em>Bush v. Gore</em>, would undermine the integrity of the Court?<br></p><p>ACB: I still will not commit to recuse myself from election litigation, that is not what people who bought me this nomination want to happen.</p><p><strong>12:51:</strong> Now ACB cannot even answer questions about whether it is OK for reporters to protect their sources, especially in this climate where Trump and Republicans attack journalists all day. You know, "ongoing litigation."<br></p><p>Of course, groups like the Federalist Society make sure that ALL things they don't like are "ongoing litigation," because they flood the courts with bullshit lawsuits. Indeed, it is a wonder they're not currently doing "ongoing litigation" to reverse <em>Brown v. Board of Education.</em></p><p>Anyway, now it is time for bullshit cutesy flirting from Ben Sasse, because that's what substance-free people do. </p><p><strong>12:59:</strong> Ben Sasse does not want cameras in the Supreme Court because he says that will make the Supreme Court like Michael Avenatti, which would be very bad. <br></p><p><strong>1:02:</strong> SASSE: What are the five freedoms of the First Amendment?<br></p><p>ACB: Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.</p><p>Just kidding, she got four of them, but forgot the one about freedom to petition the government, part of which includes ... oh nothing, just what ACB does for a living. </p><p><strong>1:15:</strong> Ben Sasse went off on his own tangent, sorry, we fell asleep.<br></p><p>CHRIS COONS; Do you think <em>Griswold</em> was wrongly decided? You know, the one that allowed contraception?</p><p>ACB: I cannot answer, but I will at least say that I think the chances of that coming into the court is pretty slim.</p><p>COONS: Other SCOTUS justices have felt free to talk about it. Seriously, you can answer this question. </p><p>ACB: Nope, I am the woman version of Clarence Thomas, therefore I do not talk. </p><p><strong>1:35:</strong> All that shit with Coons about "super-precedent," let us remind everybody that THE ONLY REASON THINGS ARE NOT "SUPER-PRECEDENTS" IS BECAUSE RIGHT-WING TROLL DARK MONEY ASSHOLES KEEP THIS SHIT IN THE COURTS, SO THAT EVERYTHING IS CONSTANTLY UP IN THE AIR.</p><p>Anyway, it is time for Commander Hawley to talk to Serena Joy again. He says we are trying to "Bork" Amy Coney Barrett, by reading words from her record.</p><p><strong>1:38: </strong>Commander Hawley says Serena Joy is an INDEPENDENT WOMAN!</p><p>Oh no, you guys, it is Amy Coney Barrett's theme song, because she is so independent!</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-youtube">
<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="da115d2023ec4ef23073c730f5cf91b8"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dS1ZW0FdoIU?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
<small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Kelly Clarkson - Miss Independent</small>
<small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dS1ZW0FdoIU" target="_blank">www.youtube.com</a>
</small>
</p><p><strong>1:39:</strong> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Commander Hawley is doing HUNTER BIDEN BURISMAS! in the Amy Coney Barrett hearing.<br></p><p>She is not biting. </p><p><strong>1:41:</strong> Commander Hawley is VERY MAD TODAY that Facebook is censoring that stupid already-debunked <em>New York Post </em>story on HUNTER BIDEN'S EMAILS!11!1!! (You know, because the story <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-hunter-biden-new-york-post-story-fact-checkers-2020-10" target="_blank">came from Rudy Giuliani's laptop,</a> which means it's most likely Russian propaganda.)</p><div id="baf83" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="9acbfe83d809ad527059cf27fd7ef4dd"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1316412214589501440" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">.@Facebook I want to know on what grounds you are actively censoring a news report about potentially illegal corrup… https://t.co/tJ6u7Lsfkr</div> — Josh Hawley (@Josh Hawley)<a href="https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/statuses/1316412214589501440">1602692104.0</a></blockquote></div><p>What a fucking clown. </p><p><strong>1:54:</strong> Haha, chortle, Amy Coney Barrett had a whole glass of wine last night, because yesterday was so hard, haha LOL giggle snort!<br></p><p><strong>1:57:</strong> God appears to have cut Amy Coney Barrett's mic. <br></p><p><strong>1:58:</strong> While we are on this unplanned break, two things: the <em>Griswold</em> case about contraception may not be likely to come before the Court again, but it is a DAMNED LIE to say anti-abortion assholes are not trying to ban birth control. They very much are.<br></p><p>Also, <a href="https://www.wonkette.com/a-modest-proposal-if-justice-roberts-kills-the-census-he-should-get-some-new-coworkers" target="_blank">Liz wrote you a great article today</a> on FUCK YEAH COURT-PACKING and you should read it. </p><p><strong>2:40:</strong> And we are back! <br></p><p>Richard Blumenthal is very disappointed that ACB cannot say out loud whether she thinks IVF should be criminalized.</p><p>BLUMENTHAL: Should the Courts decide the next election?</p><p>ACB: Elections are for voting. By people.</p><p>Wow, answers. Weird.</p><p><strong>2:43:</strong> ACB says <em>Brown v. Board</em> was correctly decided.<br></p><p>And that <em>Loving</em> was correctly decided, because it followed from Brown.</p><p>And that <em>Griswold </em>... OH DANGIT, SHE CANNOT ANSWER AGAIN ABOUT WHETHER PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE CONTRACEPTION. Blumenthal says he is "stunned" that she cannot just say yes and she would have been in the majority.</p><p><em>Lawrence v. Texas</em>, over whether gay sex could be criminalized? ACB cannot answer whether it was correctly decided. </p><p>She cannot express agreement or disagreement with precedents of the Supreme Court. At least not the two we just mentioned. Or <em>Obergefell</em>. Not that one. </p><p><strong>2:55:</strong> ACB can't say whether she thinks global warming is caused by humans, probably because global warming is an ONGOING CASE that is happening right now. <br></p><p>Also she does not know what Trump's views on climate change are. She just has no clue. Which leads us to wonder what asshole she lives up inside that she hasn't heard about this.</p><p><strong>3:00:</strong> Oh my god the sound is fucked up again and this time they're just going with it. MSNBC is like fuck this. Let us see if we can still get it on the goddamn livestream. <br></p><p>Anyway, Blumenthal's questioning was interesting and revelatory, just like it was yesterday. </p><p>Main idea: She will only say the cases that involve THE MOST RACISM, that mostly happened before she was born, are OK. Nothing else. </p><p><strong>3:15:</strong> And now we are back again, KILL THE MIC AGAIN, RUTH BADER GINSBURG!<br></p><p>Anyway, something something Thom Tillis, who is <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/14/us/politics/north-carolina-trump-polls.html" target="_blank">losing even more</a> in his Senate race than he was last month. </p><p><strong>3:20:</strong> LOL Thom Tillis just baselessly alleged that Amy Comet Ping-Pong's "constitutional rights" have been violated in this confirmation process, and asked why, after all, would she even want to do this?<br></p><p>Um, because she is a Federalist Society hack and she has been auditioning for this role for years? </p><p><strong>3:30:</strong> Tillis literally asking ACB if she is GOING to be judging whether people were able to cast valid ballots. Even she is being like "Um I don't know what kind of election disputes might come up, but ..."<br></p><p>Go lose your fucking election, asshole. </p><p><strong>3:41:</strong> We hope you are enjoying Mazie Hirono calling ACB a liar when she's like "judges can't just rule on things, cases have to happen!" Because of how literally just last week, Alito and Thomas signaled that they totally want to fuck over the gays and take away marriage equality. Judges do this shit all the time. <br></p><p><strong>3:43:</strong> HIRONO: Oh look, here is a time YOU sent a signal that you want to reconsider a precedent! In <em>Price v. Chicago</em>, which was about abortion clinic protesters, <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/17-2196/17-2196-2019-02-13.html" target="_blank">you signaled</a> that you REALLY don't think restrictions on abortion protesters are fair, even though you HAD to rule based on Supreme Court precedent. And now you are going to be on SCOTUS!<br></p><p><strong>3:53:</strong> Hirono with the mic drop on how no matter what, if ACB ruled on an election dispute, there would absolutely be the APPEARANCE of conflict, regardless of whether SHE felt there was, therefore asshole should recuse. But she won't, because that's not what they're hiring her to do. So she will continue to "not take a position."<br></p><p>Uh huh. </p><p>Anyway, Joni Ernst. MSNBC cut away, because nobody cares. </p><p><strong>4:02:</strong> We are not that far from the end, folks. Two more Democrats, one of whom is named Kamala Harris, and a few more Republican idiots. Then this shit will be over. At least this part of the shit. <br></p><p>Yawn. </p><p><strong>4:21:</strong> Should you take babies from their mommies at the border? Amy Coney Barrett cannot say!</p><p>Also Joni Ernst says her daughter has a Black friend. Please go back to Iowa and lose your election, Ernst. </p><p><strong>4:23:</strong> Also ACB will not say out loud if poll taxes are unconstitutional. So there is that. <br></p><p><strong>4:32:</strong> Mike Crapo is just VERY UPSET that anybody might suggest that a mother of Black children might not be committed to racial equality, VERY UPSET!<br></p><p>Fuck off. </p><p><strong>4:51:</strong> Finally, KAMALA!<br></p><p>Harris begins by explaining to the white woman all the things they used to do to Black people who tried to vote. Poll taxes, tests, people beaten and bruised. Segueing into the Voting Rights Act. This way, ACB has an opportunity to refuse to say whether or not she really liked it when the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act. </p><p><strong>4:55:</strong> The big question, which should be SOOOOOO simple, is whether ACB agrees with Chief Justice John Roberts that voting discrimination still exists. ACB is unclear on the question and is trying to punt it to being Congress's responsibility. <br></p><p>HARRIS: DO YOU AGREE, DAMMIT?</p><p>ACB: "I will not comment on [that]" FUCKING FUCK YOU, FUCK!</p><p><strong>5:00:</strong> HARRIS: Do you believe there is an imbalance of power between corporations and worker?<br></p><p>ACB: I cannot tell a lie, so I will just say no words. </p><p>Harris notes that ACB pretty much always rules against workers, literally 85 percent of the time, because of how ACB is a piece of shit. Harris just listing off the cases, including the time she ruled against a worker who was <a href="https://news.yahoo.com/amy-coney-barrett-ruled-n-131146289.html" target="_blank">called the "N"-word</a> by his supervisor. </p><p><strong>5:05:</strong> HARRIS: Is COVID a disease?<br></p><p>ACB: I guess.</p><p>HARRIS: Does smoking cause cancer?</p><p>ACB: I don't like this line of questioning but I suppose so, it is on the cigarette pack.</p><p>HARRIS: Is climate change real?</p><p>ACB: I am an asshole. </p><p><strong>5:08:</strong> Whew! And Kamala Harris is done. And we don't feel like listening to John Kennedy and Marsha Blackburn yap, so we're going to take a break, at which point it will be over, at which point we will continue taking a break.<br></p><p>But you should stay and watch! And hit the donate buttons below, because you love Wonkette, and you love our liveblogs, and you love us personally, and you know that Wonkette does not exist without reader donations. </p><p>Thank you we love you goodbye, unless we come back. </p><p><strong>Follow Evan Hurst on Twitter <a href="http://twitter.com/evanhurst" target="_blank">RIGHT HERE, DO IT RIGHT HERE!</a></strong><br></p><p><strong>Wonkette is fully funded by readers like YOU. If you love Wonkette, WE NEED YOUR LOVE GIFTS TO KEEP US GOING.</strong><br></p><p></p><p><a href="https://amzn.to/33mKzZe" target="_blank">Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons</a>.</p><p></p><p></p><form name="donation" method="post" class="donation-form"><p class="subheadline">How often would you like to donate?</p><div class="form-row row--plan"><label class="plan-type__label"><input type="radio" name="plan_type" value="once" class="plan-type" required="" checked> Just once
</label><label class="plan-type__label"><input type="radio" name="plan_type" value="monthly" class="plan-type" required=""> Monthly
</label></div><div class="form-row row--amount"><p class="subheadline">Select an amount (USD)</p><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="200" data-value="2.00" data-amount="Two Dollars">$2</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="2500" data-value="25.00" data-amount="Twenty Five Dollars">$25</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="500" data-value="5.00" data-amount="Five Dollars">$5</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="5000" data-value="50.00" data-amount="Fifty Dollars">$50</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="1000" data-value="10.00" data-amount="Ten Dollars" checked>$10</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="10000" data-value="100.00" data-amount="One Hundred Dollars">$100</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="1500" data-value="15.00" data-amount="Fifteen Dollars">$15</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="50000" data-value="500.00" data-amount="Five Hundred Dollars">$500</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="2000" data-value="20.00" data-amount="Twenty Dollars">$20</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="100000" data-value="1000.00" data-amount="One Thousand Dollars">$1000</label></div><div class="row--buttons"><button type="submit" class="donate-button" data-payment="strip"><img src="https://assets.rbl.ms/18208879/2000x.png" alt="Credit cards" class="donate-button__img"></button><button type="submit" class="donate-button" data-payment="paypal"><img src="https://assets.rbl.ms/18208880/2000x.png" alt="PayPal" class="donate-button__img"></button></div></form><p></p>
Keep reading...
Show less
2020 Congressional Elections
Poll Porn: The 'Americans Love Horndogs, Hate Waffles' Edition
Get ready to kiss that gavel goodbye, Mitch.
October 13, 2020 11:36 AM
THREE WEEKS.
Just twenty-one days until we fire that orange excrescence and put an end to this four-year waking nightmare. We can make it.
But if you're feeling jumpy in the meantime, Cook Political has some Senate nicetimes to calm your nerves.
We are also increasing our current Senate projection from a gain of 2 to 7 seats for Democrats Many Republicans t… https://t.co/TnvFLx3hyY— Jessica Taylor (@Jessica Taylor)1602591752.0
Burn it down, y'all. Un-pollable Alaska and Texas get moved one click to the left, from "Likely" to "Lean" Republican (goddammit, Beto!), while Georgia's special election is now looking like a tossup, with Democrat Raphael Warnock taking a plurality of votes and teed up to face Senator Kelly Loeffler in the runoff. And if there's anyone who can lose a Senate seat in Georgia, it's Kelly Loeffler.
<div id="fa0c0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="d98140c3063d719495cf4a888bc65549"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1313201217309417478" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">COVID stood NO chance against @realDonaldTrump! https://t.co/GtNPOHkDqF</div> — Kelly Loeffler (@Kelly Loeffler)<a href="https://twitter.com/KLoeffler/statuses/1313201217309417478">1601926542.0</a></blockquote></div><p>She's, like, really good at comms, you guys. Also talking about <a href="https://www.wonkette.com/kelly-loeffler-wants-atlanta-dream-players-to-shut-up-dribble-maybe-tap-dance-a-little" target="_blank">race</a>. So congrats to Gov. Brian Kemp for <a href="https://www.wonkette.com/brian-kemp-senate-appointment" target="_blank">inviting</a> Kelly Loeffler to the party and offering her just enough support that she's likely to edge out Rep. Doug Collins — who is gross, but not a complete incompetent — keeping him out of the runoff.</p><p>
Cook had <a href="https://cookpolitical.com/ratings/senate-race-ratings" target="_blank">already moved</a> South Carolina and Georgia's other Senate race into the tossup column (goddammit, Stacey!), along with Iowa, Maine, Montana, and North Carolina. And Democrat Barbara Bollier's <a href="https://www.wibw.com/2020/09/30/kansas-polls-show-tight-race-for-senate-seat/" target="_blank">strong showing</a> in Kansas puts that race in the "Lean" Republican category as well. Incidentally, if no candidate in the regular Georgia Senate race between Jon Ossoff and David Perdue gets to 50 percent, that race could go to a <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/georgias-two-senate-races-face-prospect-of-runoffs-11602417601" target="_blank">run-off round</a> as well. </p><p>
Cal Cunningham's extramarital dumbassery doesn't seem to have cost him any support in North Carolina. Or as the Raleigh NBC affiliate WRAL put it in the <a href="https://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/state/nccapitol/2020/10/12/19332468/PollPrint-DMID1-5ohw9o5y4.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a> announcing the results of a poll it commissioned from SurveyUSA:
</p><blockquote>
An ebbtide sinks all boats, and Tillis' fight for a 2nd term in the USA's quintessential battleground state cannot be judged absent the larger context of how Republicans are faring nationwide in the final weeks of President Donald J. Trump's first term. Movement in the Presidential contest between Trump and Democrat Joseph Biden and movement in the election for Governor of North Carolina, poll results from which will be released over the coming 48 hours, provide context to interpret Tillis' failure to thrive.</blockquote><p>
Ummm ... okay.
</p><p>SurveyUSA has Cunningham ahead by 10 points (49-39), improving on his lead since the sexting scandal broke and Tillis was diagnosed with coronavirus. And in fact Cunningham seems to have improved his standing with men, while maintaining a nine point advantage with women. They don't call it the Dirty South for nothing!</p><p>And, hey, lookit what just dropped as we were typing. Here's Monmouth <a href="https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_nc_101320/" target="_blank">confirming</a> that Cunningham got <em>more</em> popular once his constituents found out he was down to ... kiss a lot.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image">
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDUxMTcyNy9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY1MzQ4MzMwNX0.K7sTcL3r9grpBfdCMgDcKVkcXhUjaLQKyFe7G2cjSqs/img.png?width=980" id="989b0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="127db36c84a30b1a19fcc13ff0c46653" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image">
</p><p>Meanwhile <a href="https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/senate/maine/" target="_blank">Susan Collins</a> and <a href="https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/senate/arizona/" target="_blank">Martha McSally</a> continue to be as popular with their constituents as cold sores. (To be fair, Susan Collins is doing better than Martha McSally, who's barely beating out genital warts.)<br></p><p>All of which has FiveThirtyEight's model <a href="https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-election-forecast/senate/" target="_blank">projecting</a> Democrats will re-take the Senate in 69 out of 100 "scenarios". <em>Whatever that means</em>. Anyway, we think it's good. And it's good that no one on earth is projecting the GOP has a chance to win back the House.</p><p>So, take nothing for granted, but also don't give yourself an ulcer panicking either. We're going to make it, after all.</p><p><strong>Follow Liz Dye on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/5DollarFeminist" target="_blank">RIGHT HERE!</a></strong><br></p><p><strong>Please click here to support your Wonkette. And if you're ordering your quarantine goods on Amazon, <a href="https://amzn.to/2wbH77j" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">this is the link to do it.</a></strong></p><p></p><form name="donation" method="post" class="donation-form"><p class="subheadline">How often would you like to donate?</p><div class="form-row row--plan"><label class="plan-type__label"><input type="radio" name="plan_type" value="once" class="plan-type" required="" checked> Just once
</label><label class="plan-type__label"><input type="radio" name="plan_type" value="monthly" class="plan-type" required=""> Monthly
</label></div><div class="form-row row--amount"><p class="subheadline">Select an amount (USD)</p><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="200" data-value="2.00" data-amount="Two Dollars">$2</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="2500" data-value="25.00" data-amount="Twenty Five Dollars">$25</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="500" data-value="5.00" data-amount="Five Dollars">$5</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="5000" data-value="50.00" data-amount="Fifty Dollars">$50</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="1000" data-value="10.00" data-amount="Ten Dollars" checked>$10</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="10000" data-value="100.00" data-amount="One Hundred Dollars">$100</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="1500" data-value="15.00" data-amount="Fifteen Dollars">$15</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="50000" data-value="500.00" data-amount="Five Hundred Dollars">$500</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="2000" data-value="20.00" data-amount="Twenty Dollars">$20</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="100000" data-value="1000.00" data-amount="One Thousand Dollars">$1000</label></div><div class="row--buttons"><button type="submit" class="donate-button" data-payment="strip"><img src="https://assets.rbl.ms/18208879/2000x.png" alt="Credit cards" class="donate-button__img"></button><button type="submit" class="donate-button" data-payment="paypal"><img src="https://assets.rbl.ms/18208880/2000x.png" alt="PayPal" class="donate-button__img"></button></div></form><p></p>
Keep reading...
Show less
2020 Congressional Elections
Amy McGrath Stares Into Abyss Where Mitch McConnell’s Soul Should Be
C’mon, Kentucky, you can do better than this.
October 13, 2020 10:30 AM
Watch Live: Kentucky US Senate Debate Oct 12 2020 www.youtube.com
Democrat Amy McGrath walked through the valley of the shadow of death and faced Republican Senator Mitch McConnell at their first debate Monday. She hoped to convince Kentucky voters to abandon this twisted ghoul, a walking compost bag of evil. She did well, hammering the Senate majority leader on how little he actually cares about Kentuckians. When McConnell took credit for oh-so-generously passing a coronavirus relief bill in March, McGrath reminded him that it's October, the coronavirus is still here, and millions have lost their jobs.
MCGRATH: The House put up legislation in May, and it's been sitting on [McConnell's] desk all summer long. He took a vacation, didn't see the urgency to do anything. Meanwhile, here in Kentucky, we have a million Kentuckians that have filed for unemployment sometime in the last six months. We have 300,000 Kentuckians that still don't have healthcare in the middle of coronavirus. And he's walking away from negotiations even now when President Trump even wants negotiations to happen before this election. It's irresponsible.
I might've used a stronger word here than “irresponsible," like “depraved" or “pernicious." McConnell is a "most specially greedy, strong and wicked worm," but he remembers to take his cans out to the curb on garbage day.
<blockquote><strong>MCCONNELL:</strong> Well, what she supported after the Cares Act was the so-called Heroes bill over in the House at $3 trillion, and which included in it, <strong>by the way, tax cuts for rich people in New York and California,</strong> healthcare for illegal immigrants, and by the way, that bill that she supported, that they passed in the House after the Cares Act, provided more money for Puerto Rico than it did for Kentucky. In spite of her best efforts, she's a national Democrat. She is in line with Schumer and Pelosi and all the rest on all of these issues.</blockquote><p>Yeah, McConnell is a regular Bernie Sanders when it comes to tax cuts for all those billionaires who apparently live exclusively in “blue" states. Meanwhile, he's all for helping out broke-ass “red" states, where "real Americans" live. Healthcare during a pandemic is vital, especially because COVID-19 makes no distinction for immigration status. McConnell is a master of appealing to people's worst instincts, so he claims no one should receive anything if American citizens in Puerto Rico, who've been hit by hurricanes and earthquakes on top of a pandemic, receive a dime more. </p><p>McGrath called out McConnell on his jacked-up priorities: He'd rather “ram through" a Supreme Court nominee while he still has a Senate majority than negotiate another stimulus bill. McConnell countered with more lies about how Democrats aren't interested in negotiation because they won't sign onto bills that permit business to recklessly expose workers to coronavirus without accountability. He also grossly claimed that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi isn't interested in solutions before the election. </p><p>McConnell, along with his entire caucus, likes to drag Democrats into the moral mud with him. It's been a constant Republican refrain that Democrats want Americans desperate and angry for their own political ends. The reality is that Democrats won't settle for the pack of Chiclets Republicans are offering the unemployed.</p><p>McGrath pointed out that if McConnell isn't up to the challenge of negotiating with Pelosi, if he thinks it's too hard, then he should let the badass Marine fighter pilot handle it. McConnell just laughed in her face ... no, really. It was creepy as fuck. He sounded like <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Yej5RQFbMo" target="_blank">Mumm-Ra</a> from the “Thundercats." I'm surprised he didn't <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEr2hpnmw4E" target="_blank">tell McGrath, </a>“You can't defeat me! For wherever evil exists, Mitch McConnell lives!"</p><div id="55b1f" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="b85347d6cf1f356f4ad05dd0f5de9f23"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1315830220549615616" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Here's Mitch McConnell laughing like Confederate Voldemort at dead doctors, nurses, teachers, first line workers, m… https://t.co/Zo89M5ZqX1</div> — Randi Mayem Singer (@Randi Mayem Singer)<a href="https://twitter.com/rmayemsinger/statuses/1315830220549615616">1602553346.0</a></blockquote></div><p>McConnell also seemed to have abandoned the sinking Trump ship. He claimed he was able to “make deals with Joe Biden during the Obama era," but the real obstacle right now is Speaker Pelosi. McGrath correctly knocked him for just making excuses. He's the leader of a Senate that can't make a deal with the House during a national crisis. That's on him. </p><p>Both candidates were asked about confirming a Supreme Court justice so close to the election. McConnell didn't even bother addressing his own personal hypocrisy. He stole a Supreme Court vacancy from Obama and he enjoyed it. Now he's going to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a rightwing religious extremist. He'll enjoy that, too. </p><p>McConnell raved about Amy Coney Barrett, whom he called an “extraordinary nominee," an "outstanding woman, an accomplished scholar." She's even successfully reproduced, which is more than you ever did. He also made a point of singling out her adopted children and child with special needs, when they are all simply her children. </p><p>He also thought McGrath had lost her damn mind when she suggested that Barrett's hit-and-run confirmation is so she can help overturn the Affordable Care Act, which would deny millions of Americans health care during a pandemic.</p><blockquote><strong>MCCONNELL:</strong> No one believes the Supreme Court is going to strike down the Affordable Care Act.</blockquote><p>You gotta feel bad for those poor lawyers, arguing on behalf of conservatives who want to obliterate the ACA. Their own slimy brethren are insisting their cause is futile. Their only comfort is knowing that Republicans who reassure voters that the ACA is safe are lying.</p><p>McConnell then said the words "Ruth Bader Ginsburg," and I almost went all Elvis Presley on the TV. He claims “we all revere" RBG, even though he's replacing her before the election against her express wishes. He rejected the idea of expanding the Supreme Court and quoted Ginsburg, who said “nine is the right number." That was in response to McConnell holding Antonin Scalia's seat open for a year. Obviously, McConnell doesn't believe in the sacredness of <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNdcFPjGsm8" target="_blank">the number nine. </a></p><p>McConnell eventually just went into his Democrats and their "far-left agenda" routine, which you've heard a million times already. McGrath is no different from any other liberal you don't like from those states with brown people and the gays. She'll side with Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi and make “that ultimate swamp, the District of Columbia, a state." Americans live there, by the way. </p><p>He dismissed McGrath's campaign as nothing more than "she's a Marine, she's a mom, and [McConnell's] been there too long." Way to support those troops. Also, he was practically showing pictures of Barrett's family a few minutes earlier. McConnell is a crawling piece of slime, and he's still several points up in the polls. After the debate, stunned viewers on social media wondered why Kentucky voters inevitably rally behind him. I'm reminded of the moment when Superman beats the villain Darkseid in battle and hands him over to the people he's enslaved. They're so broken they don't turn on him but instead carry him to safety. Darkseid's final words are haunting: “I am many things, Kal-El, but here I am God." </p><p>However, there's still time for Kentucky to make a better choice for themselves and the nation.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-youtube">
<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="f2e6239ceeecc1e984cc2f438ef77a66"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/phWcmwlpjQo?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
</p><p>[<a href="https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/mitch-mcconnell-vs-amy-mcgrath-kentucky-senate-debate-transcript-october-12" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Rev.com</a>]</p><p><em>Follow Stephen Robinson on </em><em><a href="https://twitter.com/SER1897" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Twitter.</a></em></p><p><a href="https://amzn.to/33mKzZe" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons</a>.</p><p><strong>Yr Wonkette is 100 percent ad free and supported entirely by reader donations. Please click the clickie, if you are able!</strong></p><p></p><form name="donation" method="post" class="donation-form"><p class="subheadline">How often would you like to donate?</p><div class="form-row row--plan"><label class="plan-type__label"><input type="radio" name="plan_type" value="once" class="plan-type" required="" checked> Just once
</label><label class="plan-type__label"><input type="radio" name="plan_type" value="monthly" class="plan-type" required=""> Monthly
</label></div><div class="form-row row--amount"><p class="subheadline">Select an amount (USD)</p><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="200" data-value="2.00" data-amount="Two Dollars">$2</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="2500" data-value="25.00" data-amount="Twenty Five Dollars">$25</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="500" data-value="5.00" data-amount="Five Dollars">$5</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="5000" data-value="50.00" data-amount="Fifty Dollars">$50</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="1000" data-value="10.00" data-amount="Ten Dollars" checked>$10</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="10000" data-value="100.00" data-amount="One Hundred Dollars">$100</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="1500" data-value="15.00" data-amount="Fifteen Dollars">$15</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="50000" data-value="500.00" data-amount="Five Hundred Dollars">$500</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="2000" data-value="20.00" data-amount="Twenty Dollars">$20</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="100000" data-value="1000.00" data-amount="One Thousand Dollars">$1000</label></div><div class="row--buttons"><button type="submit" class="donate-button" data-payment="strip"><img src="https://assets.rbl.ms/18208879/2000x.png" alt="Credit cards" class="donate-button__img"></button><button type="submit" class="donate-button" data-payment="paypal"><img src="https://assets.rbl.ms/18208880/2000x.png" alt="PayPal" class="donate-button__img"></button></div></form><p></p>
Keep reading...
Show less
SCOTUS
Amy Klobuchar Sets Tone For Amy Coney Barrett Hearings, By Beating Everyone's Ass
If you watch one thing from this week, let it be this.
October 13, 2020 09:30 AM
Hi! You are probably watching the first day of questioning in the confirmation hearings for Amy Comet Ping Pong Amy Bony Carrot Amy Serena Joy Waterford "Handmaid's Tale" Coney Barrett. But in case you missed yesterday's opening statements from the nominee and the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, this is what you need to know about, besides the part where GOP Senator Mike Lee, WHO HAS COVID-19, did the hearing without a mask and just fuckin' breathed on everybody. And that committee chair Lindsey Graham and former committee chair Chuck Grassley refuse to even get tested, because skullfucking American democracy is more important to them than their personal health.
Ugh, we will have a whole 'nother post on that shit today.
This is the important thing:
Minnesota's Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar would like you to know that this week is bullshit. Just unmitigated, undemocratic, un-American bullshit. She'd like the other Republican senators on the Judiciary Committee to know this, and she'd like Amy Fuckin' Comet Ping-Ping Handmaid Idiot McGee to know this, and she'd like Judge Serena Joy Waterford to look her in the eye while she calls it bullshit.
Mostly, she'd like every American voter — millions of whom are voting THIS VERY WEEK — to know the following:
"Judge, I think this hearing is a sham," said Klobuchar. "I think it shows real messed up priorities from the Republican Party."
BUT, she said, "we have a secret weapon that they don't have." Tasers? No not tasers. Klobuchar said it is you, and we, and all of us, by which she means the voters. Who are, again, VOTING RIGHT NOW. In droves! This very week!
And you know what's going to happen if these motherfuckers put Serena Joy on the Supreme Court? Oh we dunno but it rhymes with "SMACK THE JORTS."
‘I think this hearing is a sham’ — Sen. Amy Klobuchar calls on Americans to urge their senators to oppose Amy Coney… https://t.co/3wwDjfzubN— NowThis (@NowThis)1602521580.0
<p>Amy Klobuchar would like y'all to know some other things too:</p><p>That INJUSTICE moves "at lightning speed, as we are seeing here today."</p><p>That the president who nominated this garbage human to take Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat refuses to commit to a peaceful transfer of power. Everybody does that, she said, but "not this guy." </p><p>That he is throat-cramming the American people with this terrible nominee because <em>he</em> thinks the election is going to end up in the Supreme Court, and he wants her godawful ass to rubberstamp his election stealing. </p><p>That healthcare for millions of Americans is coming before the Supreme Court, and the Republicans are doing this to try to kill Obamacare, IN THE MIDDLE OF A PANDEMIC. You know, the pandemic Mike Lee appeared to be coughing all over everyone, that he may have gotten directly from open-mouth kissing Donald Trump, not that we are in any way sure about that.</p><p>That she was doing this for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, because of how she realized that Ginsburg's dissents were "blueprints for the future," as she explained to Rachel Maddow last night. </p><p>And finally, that "this isn't Donald Trump's country. It's yours." And "This shouldn't be Donald Trump's judge. It should be yours."</p><p>Oh and also all y'all Republicans need to go fuck yourselves with a rake, just kidding she didn't say that, but she maybe thought it, oh well, Wonkette thought it, and that's good enough for inclusion in this blog post. </p><p><strong>Follow Evan Hurst on Twitter <a href="http://twitter.com/evanhurst" target="_blank">RIGHT HERE, DO IT RIGHT HERE!</a></strong></p><p><strong>Wonkette is fully funded by readers like YOU. If you love Wonkette, WE NEED YOUR LOVE GIFTS TO KEEP US GOING.</strong><br></p><p></p><p><a href="https://amzn.to/33mKzZe" target="_blank">Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons</a>.</p><p></p><p></p><form name="donation" method="post" class="donation-form"><p class="subheadline">How often would you like to donate?</p><div class="form-row row--plan"><label class="plan-type__label"><input type="radio" name="plan_type" value="once" class="plan-type" required="" checked> Just once
</label><label class="plan-type__label"><input type="radio" name="plan_type" value="monthly" class="plan-type" required=""> Monthly
</label></div><div class="form-row row--amount"><p class="subheadline">Select an amount (USD)</p><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="200" data-value="2.00" data-amount="Two Dollars">$2</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="2500" data-value="25.00" data-amount="Twenty Five Dollars">$25</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="500" data-value="5.00" data-amount="Five Dollars">$5</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="5000" data-value="50.00" data-amount="Fifty Dollars">$50</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="1000" data-value="10.00" data-amount="Ten Dollars" checked>$10</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="10000" data-value="100.00" data-amount="One Hundred Dollars">$100</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="1500" data-value="15.00" data-amount="Fifteen Dollars">$15</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="50000" data-value="500.00" data-amount="Five Hundred Dollars">$500</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="2000" data-value="20.00" data-amount="Twenty Dollars">$20</label><label class="amount__label"><input type="radio" name="amount" class="amount" value="100000" data-value="1000.00" data-amount="One Thousand Dollars">$1000</label></div><div class="row--buttons"><button type="submit" class="donate-button" data-payment="strip"><img src="https://assets.rbl.ms/18208879/2000x.png" alt="Credit cards" class="donate-button__img"></button><button type="submit" class="donate-button" data-payment="paypal"><img src="https://assets.rbl.ms/18208880/2000x.png" alt="PayPal" class="donate-button__img"></button></div></form><p></p>
Keep reading...
Show less
Newsletter
©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc
