Donate

Melania Trump is SUING. She is suing the Daily Mail for $150 million, because of an article they wrote that she believes suggested that she was maybe a hooker at one point.


Now! If Melania did not work for an escort agency, and the Daily Mail asserted that she did while knowing it was false, for malicious purposes, to hurt her reputation, then yes! She can and should sue! Because that's bad and you're not supposed to do that. #JOURNALISM.

That's the standard established in New York Times, Co. v. Sullivan. It is a fair standard and a good one, which protects free speech about public figures while discouraging outright lies and defamation.

But that is not quite what happened in this situation. Rather, the Daily Mail reported that some books alleging that Melania's former modeling agency was also an escort agency happened to exist. Stating the existence of a thing does not in any way mean that you are suggesting that thing is true.

However -- that is not the news here today! The real news-time-funsies is that, in the lawsuit, Melania's lawyers allege that the article has caused her to lose her chance to establish “multimillion dollar business relationships” during the time when she would be "the most photographed woman in the world."

The lawsuit suggests that Melania had plans to profit off the "once in a lifetime opportunity" of being First Lady, in order to sell even more of her crap on the Home Shopping Network. Which somehow still exists, despite the internet also existing.

“These product categories would have included, among other things, apparel accessories, shoes, jewelry, cosmetics, hair care, skin care and fragrance.”

Now! Let's be honest here, Melania. I don't think there is a single person out there who has thought to themselves "Oh gee! You know, I would totally buy "Totally Classy Just Like How Jackie O Was Classy, OK? By Melania," if only I had not read that article in the Daily Mail about how some books reported that she was maybe an escort at one time." I do not believe that is a thing, nor would any reasonable person. I'm gonna say that if anyone is impeding the public's thirst for Melania Trump products, it is her husband. Also possibly her, as she is also terrible.

There's really no way to prove that the article made it harder for Melania to sell anything to anybody, nor any way to prove that there are people who would have bought her wares if the article had never come out. I don't even remember that article coming out, frankly, and I still was not going to buy any of her crap. I mean, I'm sorry, but this costume ring is not cute.

And neither is literally anything that her husband does. If she's suing anyone, it should be her own husband. Also the people who design her jewelry.

I was also not going to buy Ivanka Trump's crap -- and didn't before this, either, because oh man, I have seen that shit in Marshall's and it is tacky as hell.

The other issue here is that the lawsuit makes it pretty obvious that the Trump family has no qualms about profiting off the presidency. I'm not saying Melania can't have a job, but to explicitly state that an article made it more difficult for her to profit off of a thing that she shouldn't be profiting from in the first place? That is a little sketchy!

Especially when you consider the fact that we, the taxpayers, are also paying for Eric Trump's hotel stays during his business trips. And that Donald Trump has not actually divested from his business interests. The Trump plan, it seems, is to roll around in sweet, sweet, emoluments for the next four years.

The lawsuit also states that the article “impugned her fitness to perform her duties as First Lady of the United States.” Which is weird, because she doesn't appear to be planning on doing any of that anyway, given the fact that instead of moving to the White House, she's staying in Trump Tower until Barron finishes school and costing NYC taxpayers a million dollars a day to do so, and she still hasn't hired a staff.

But hey! We'll see how this turns out. There may end up being a Daily Mail sponsored QVC hour for Melania yet!

[Washington Post]

Robyn Pennacchia

Robyn Pennacchia is a brilliant, fabulously talented and visually stunning angel of a human being, who shrugged off what she is pretty sure would have been a Tony Award-winning career in musical theater in order to write about stuff on the internet. Previously, she was a Senior Staff Writer at Death & Taxes, and Assistant Editor at The Frisky (RIP). Currently, she writes for Wonkette, Friendly Atheist, Quartz and other sites. Follow her on Twitter at @RobynElyse

$
Donate with CC
It started with them damn hats. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)

A guest post by "Knitsy McPurlson," which we suspect is not a real name.

Yr Wonkette is not the only website run by brilliant peoples unafraid to poke people with sharp, pointy sticks. Ravelry.com – a website for knitters, crocheters, and other folks interested in textiles and fiber arts – is poking people with knitting needles, which are very sharp indeed.

This past weekend, Ravelry.com's founders showed the world how easy it is to de-platform white nationalists and racists when they banned all "support of Donald Trump and his administration" from their website, concluding they "cannot provide a space that is inclusive of all and also allow support for open white supremacy." Seems like people smart enough to decode a knitting pattern are also smart enough to decode Trump's not-so-hidden message of racism and white nationalism.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

One day, God willing, my grandchildren will click open their history textbooks and read about the Central American migrant internment camps. They'll learn about sick kids, locked in cages, kept hungry and dirty and cold for weeks on end, and they'll be horrified.

"Bubbie," they'll say, "how could this happen in America? How could there be toddlers sleeping on the ground without blankets, without soap or toothbrushes to clean themselves?"

"I don't know. I wish I had done more. I'm ashamed," I'll say. We will all have to answer for this atrocity. But some of us will have to answer more than others. Not just the archvillains like Stephen Miller and John Kelly, but the people who kept right on doing their jobs, even as those jobs morphed into defending concentration camps.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc