Donate

From a tiny sub packed with scientists in Fantastic Voyage to miniature Rick Moranis in Honey I Shrunk the Kids and most recently with Antman going to the quantum realm in the Avengers movies, shrinking shit to small size has been a mainstay of sci-fi for years. And now, my pals down the road at MIT have moved us a step closer to that reality. One might say, "one small step." #rimshot

So, it's not exactly DIRECT miniaturization of objects. The scientists who came up with the process call it "implosion fabrication" and it's more like 3D photocopying with the shrink setting on your machine set to 1/1000. How does it work? I'm glad you asked!


First, credit to the smarty pants types who came up with the shrink ray: Edward Boyden, the Y. Eva Tan Professor in Neurotechnology and an associate professor of biological engineering and brain and cognitive sciences at MIT is one pendejo, and Adam Marblestone, an MIT Media Lab research affiliate, is the other. (Their paper came out Dec 14 in Science.) The lead authors are graduate students Daniel Oran and Samuel Rodriques. Now, here comes the science!

Start with a very absorbent material that will serve as the scaffold for the tiny object that will result in the end. These guys used one of the ingredients found in disposable diapers to capture baby pee. Next, soak the scaffold in a solution that contains molecules of fluorescein. Fluorescein is not the latest toothpaste additive, but a molecule that is a fluorescent dye and can be tracked easily by a microscope. Further, once attached to the scaffold, you can zap it with a laser and activate the molecule. In this case, "activating" means, attaching the molecule exactly where you want. That part is a bit technical and involves microscopy and talented PhD types, but the main point is that you end up with the fluorescein molecules just where you want them in the scaffold. These become anchor points in the scaffold.

"You attach the anchors where you want with light, and later you can attach whatever you want to the anchors," Boyden says. "It could be a quantum dot, it could be a piece of DNA, it could be a gold nanoparticle."

That's the next step. Add the desired molecules to the right locations, and then shrink the entire structure by adding an acid. The acid blocks the negative charges in the absorbent gel so they no longer repel each other. This causes the gel and therefore the whole structure to contract. Using this technique, science peeps can shrink the objects they assemble 10-fold in each dimension. Three dimensions, so 10-fold times three means you can shrink something to 1/1000th its original size. This ability to shrink not only allows for increased resolution, but also makes it possible to assemble materials in a low-density scaffold. This enables easy access for modification, and later the material becomes a dense solid when it is shrunk.

Here's a photo of a thingamajig they built, before shrinking it:

Daniel Oran

Here's a diagram of the process in case my description was too shitty:

From the Science paper

The potential uses for this new tech are still unknown, but early applications target optics applications where one could make smaller but better lenses for microscopes and other camera-like devices. Obviously, you could make leaps in nano-delivery of medicine. It would be easier with implosion fabrication to manufacture a submarine-like machine with different compartments for chemotherapies targeting hard-to-reach tumors in a patient. Build it in a small but manageable size to manufacture and then shrink it with this new technique! Cool stuff, my pendejos!

Now that we're on the path to shrinking things, just remember that in science there is always a dark side. I'll just leave you with Dr. Martin's cautionary words:

"I know I shouldn't get small when I'm drivin', but, uh, I was drivin' around the other day, you know and a cop pulls me over. And he goes, 'Hey, are you small?' I said, 'No, I'm tall, I'm tall.' He said, 'Well, I'm gonna have to measure you.' They've got a little test they give you; it's a balloon, and if you can get inside of it, they know... you're small. And they can't put you in a regular cell either, because you walk right out."

Wonkette is just a tiny small little website, not hurting nobody. Throw us some crumbs if you are able!

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Carlos Sagan

I am a biochemist MexiCAN. I also write screenplays, ever hoping to get one made.

email me at: carlossagan2018@gmail.com

follow me at: @RealCarlosSagan

$
Donate with CC

We want to say right here at the outset that we hate Julian Assange. Aside from the sexual assault allegations against him, and aside from the fact that he's just a generally stinky and loathsome person who reportedly smeared poop on the walls at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, while reportedly not taking care of his cat, an innocent creature, he acted as Russia's handmaiden during the 2016 election, in order to further Russia's campaign to steal it for Donald Trump. All signs point to his campaign being a success!

So we are justifiably happy when bad things happen to Julian Assange. We are happy his name is shit the world over, and that any reputation WikiLeaks used to have for being on the side of freedom and transparency has been stuffed down the toilet where it belongs. We are happy he looked like such a sad-ass loser when the Ecuadorian embassy finally kicked him out and he was arrested.

And quite frankly, we were OK with the initial charge against him recently unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia. If you'll remember, he was charged with trying to help Chelsea Manning hack a password into the Defense Department, which is not what journalists do. Journalists do not drive the get-away car for sources. Journalists do not hold their sources' hair back while they're stealing classified intel. Assange is essentially accused of doing all that.

Now, put all that aside. Because -- and this is key -- journalists do publish secrets they are provided by sources. That's First Amendment, chapter and verse, American as fucking apple pie and fast-food-induced diabetes. And that is what much of the superseding indictment of Assange unsealed yesterday was about. (And nope, it wasn't about anything regarding Assange's ratfucking the 2016 election or Hillary's emails. Why would the Trump Justice Department prosecute anything about that? It's all about the older Chelsea Manning stuff, the stuff the Obama Justice Department considered charging Assange with, but ultimately declined, because of that little thing called the First Amendment.)

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Video screenshot

The pharmaceutical giant Gilead Sciences, Inc. -- heck of a name for these times -- recently announced US sales of a generic version of its HIV prevention drug Truvada would begin a year earlier than originally planned. The stepped-up schedule for the generic was at least in part the result of pressure from activists, who have made a lot of noise about the fact that Gilead's huge revenues from Truvada -- about $3 billion annually -- came only after the basic research for the drug was done at taxpayer expense, largely through grants from the Centers for Disease Control, which holds the patent on the drug.

At a House Oversight Committee hearing last week, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez let one of the witnesses, Gilead CEO Daniel O'Day, know she wasn't personally blaming him or his greed for the high cost of the drug, which prevents the spread of HIV through "pre-exposure prophylaxis" (PrEP). No, that's all a result of the terrible incentives that come from the fact that the US, alone among developed countries, treats healthcare as a commodity, not a right for all. Which is why a monthly supply of Truvada costs nearly $1800 here, and roughly eight dollars in Australia.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc