Donate

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher's New Very Sane Benghazi Theory: Obama Let Ambassador Die To Win Reelection

News

Delusional surfin' fuckstick Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R - The Taliban), not having access to any actual dead horses or a riding crop, returned yesterday to one of his favorite topics, the still utterly mysterious events of September 11, 2012, in Benghazi, Libya. We presume maybe you've heard something about that? It seems that Rep. Rohrabacher (We will just call him RepRohr, and imagine his name being said by George Jetson's dog Astro) has a new theory about what happened: Barack Obama gave some thought to sending a rescue mission, but decided to sit back and let Ambassador Chris Stevens die because he is both weaker and more Machiavellian than Jimmy Carter. Makes sense to us, dood.


The O.C. Weekly's R. Scott Moxley has the skinny on RepRohr's tactical brilliance:

Rohrabacher claims Benghazi is like President Jimmy Carter's failed 1980 helicopter attempt to rescue American captives in Iran.

"Maybe Prez thought failed rescue = no re-election, like Carter in 1980," the congressman theorized on Twitter late Tuesday night.

In other words, according to Rohrabacher's mental machinations, Obama knowingly allowed Stevens to be murdered so that he could win re-election.

This is a perfectly compelling analysis of Obama's otherwise-inexplicable refusal to launch a rescue mission in the middle of a complete military and intelligence clusterfuck: He knew exactly what was happening and decided to let an ambassador die because he did not want to risk a rescue. Oh, wait, there may be just one teensy problem with that scenario: We've known since October that the Pentagon never even considered a rescue mission in Benghazi, because despite what chickenhawks like RepRohr might believe, the CIA never asked for help, and the military tries not to launch massive rescue operations when there's insufficient intelligence. As Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said in October,

“There’s a lot of Monday-morning quarterbacking going on here,” Mr. Panetta told reporters at the Pentagon, adding that “the basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on, without having some real-time information about what’s taking place.”

As a result, Mr. Panetta said, he and two top commanders “felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.” The commanders are Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Gen. Carter F. Ham of Africa Command, which oversees American military operations in Africa, including Libya.

Absolutely no new information has surfaced since then to suggest that rescue was a realistic option, but this doesn't make Barack Obama any less of a murderer for not throwing more troops into an uncertain situation that they probably could not have helped with, because rescues always go so well on G.I. Joe, and never result in a Blackhawk helicopter being shot down by an RPG.

So yes, Rep. Rohrabacher, keep calling the President a failure for failing to do an impossible thing that no one in the military ever said was a viable option. Because you look so very tough saying it.

[OC Weekly / NYT]

Doktor Zoom

Doktor Zoom's real name is Marty Kelley, and he lives in the wilds of Boise, Idaho. He is not a medical doctor, but does have a real PhD in Rhetoric. You should definitely donate some money to this little mommyblog where he has finally found acceptance and cat pictures. He is on maternity leave until 2033. Here is his Twitter, also. His quest to avoid prolixity is not going so great.

$
Donate with CC

Last week, Nicole Arteaga of Peoria, Arizona received the devastating news from her doctor that her baby's development had stopped and that pregnancy would end in a miscarriage. Given the option of either a D&C or prescription medication, she chose to go with the prescription. Then, like all normal people do when they get a prescription, she went to a pharmacy to have it filled.

Unfortunately for her, Brian Hrenuic -- the pharmacist at the Walgreens she went to -- refused to give her that prescription, because he opposed it on "moral grounds."

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

When the Trump administration starting taking migrant children at the border like it was a lending library, there were concerns they'd be used as leverage against their parents. This probably was because people close to Donald Trump kept saying out loud that the intent was to use them as leverage.

Trump has since heroically stopped (somewhat) doing the cruel thing he was doing. He's now moved on to an entirely new cruel thing. The former "Apprentice" host wants to add some reality TV game show spice to the immigration dilemma: Parents caught crossing the border illegally can either remain detained with their kids in a sweltering tent city or give up custody of the child, to be cared for by a hopefully nice person and maybe someday seen again. We call it "Sophist's Choice."

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

SINGLE & MONTHLY DONATIONS

SUPPORT THE CAUSE - PAYPAL DONATION

PAYPAL RECURRING DONATIONS

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc