There Is A Flaw In Jesse Watters's 'Marry Women So They Vote Republican' Plan
No one even wants to date them.
For the last few months, Republicans have been predicting a "Red Wave" (would have gone with Crimson Tide, personally) in this election. Part of this is just strategy — if you act overconfident and talk about how much everyone loves you and wants what you are selling, people will usually just go along with you out of sheer laziness — but many of them also seem to have really believed it and were quite shocked when it, sadly, did not come to pass.
SAD! Looks Like GOP Governor Candidates Picked The Wrong Election Day To Go MAGA
Fox News's Jeanine Pirro was heartbroken to discover that while she thought people would be voting on "the economy, inflation, crime" — none of which are problems that electing Republicans would solve — many of them were actually voting on abortion. She shouldn't have been too surprised by this, however, because "the economy, inflation, crime" are the things Republicans started focusing on and insisting this election was about after Roe v. Wade was overturned and it was widely speculated that it would make things difficult for Republicans this November.
\u201cJeanine: so many people voted on issues that weren\u2019t the issues we thought they were voting on. We thought it was about the economy, inflation crime..\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1668032308
Of course, abortion is also an economic issue, as having a child is a very big economic decision. Some people like to forget that.
Now some of them are already hashing out new strategies for winning upcoming elections. Given that almost the entire country is gerrymandered within an inch of its life to favor Republicans, some of those strategies are pretty, uh, creative.
Jesse Watters, for one, says that the real problem is single women and suggests that men ought to stem this tide by marrying them, so that they then become more conservative.
He said:
Also, single women are breaking for Democrats by 30 points. And this makes sense when you think about how Democrat policies are designed to keep women single.
But once women get married, they vote Republican. Married women, married men go for Republicans by double digits. But single women and voters under 40 have been captured by Democrats. So, we need these ladies to get married. And it's time to fall in love and just settle down. Guys, go put a ring on it.
First — let us note that he does not name any of these policies "designed to keep women single," because that is not a thing and it would be very weird if it were. Clearly what he's referring to are civil rights laws and economic reforms that make it possible for women to be economically independent and not have to rely on a man to survive. He just doesn't want to come right out and say we shouldn't be allowed to have our own credit cards.
Second — correlation isn't causation. It may simply be that conservatives are more likely to get married and to get married at a younger age. Probably because they tend to live in rural areas where there is less to do and more societal pressure to get married in the first place.
Watters is far from the first person to come up with this theory. I've seen similar ideas and variations bandied about in rightwing forums and incel message boards for years. The idea is that by getting rid of the social safety net, outlawing abortion, getting rid of no-fault divorce, and enacting other reforms that make it more difficult for a woman to be economically independent, wild single liberal women will be forced to settle down and therefore will become more conservative and more likely to vote Republicans.
Third — there is one very big thing standing in their way, and that is the fact they are so incredibly unfuckable.
This is not just me saying this, though it is also me saying this. One of the more delightful news stories that pops up every now and again is the woeful tale of The Unfuckable Republicans. "Young DC Conservatives: No One Wants to Date Us," reads one headline from The Washingtonian. "Donald Trump supporters are struggling to find online dates" says the Daily Mail. "The question keeping Trump-loving men up at night," according to one article on NBC's Think, is "Why won't liberal women date us?" A Pew Research poll found that "Most Democrats seeking a relationship wouldn't date a Trump supporter." "Conservatives Are Whining Because No One Wants to Date Them" reads a headline from Vice. "National Review's Lament: No One Will F*ck Trump Voters" says one from Wonkette.
Republicans have been throwing a fit for the last several years over the fact that Democrats won't even swipe right on them on Tinder, and Jesse Watters thinks that the solution to their electoral woes is for them to marry us, which will then lead to a glorious electoral victory for the Republican Party several years down the road. That should work out great for them.
Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.
Wonkette is independent and fully funded by readers like you. Click below to tip us!
OAN Idiot Knows Why Incel Mass Shootings Happen, It Is All This Free Sex
'K.
Kara McKinney is the One America News host who looks like she was in the middle of a field trip from homeschool to the OAN studios and the regular anchor suddenly died and she was the only one available to take their place. And she has thoughts on why incels do mass shootings. It is all the sex! No, not the sex they are having. It is the sex everybody else is having! Specifically the very hot sexy guys who are having all the sex with all the everybody, which leads to there being nobody left for the incels to have sex with!
Which ... sounds strangely like actual incel logic, as they explain it on their message boards. Is the OAN host ... defending that?
Let's find out!
We'll do the whole big block quote from Media Matters, because every McKinney monologue reads like a quickly-thrown-together book report from My First Wingnut Newscast, like her mom's giving her extra credit in homeschool for this.
KARA MCKINNEY (HOST): We’re not the first culture to experiment with, you know, free sex. That’s something that’s actually been tried many, many times before, and what you see through a lot of — especially a lot of ancient and pagan societies, is that the most high status of men, that they’re going to get all the women.
Host fails to give examples of all the cultures that have "experimented" with "free sex," which has been "tried many, many times before." But yes, all these pagan societies with the extremely high status of the men who get all the girls and?
And that it’s the lower status men who are not going to get women. And of course what you see in those men, you see a lot of them turning to aggressive violence, trying to kidnap women.
What you see in these ancient pagan societies McKinney just knows a lot about, the lower status men who don't get the girls just turn to aggressive violence and kidnap all the women.
There’s a lot of problems socially that actually fall out from that, that women — that’s why you have the trope of the harems, you know, with the king.
The trope of the harems, you know, with the king. Lot of problems socially that actually fall out from that.
Did Sarah Palin ghostwrite this monologue?
You know, he gets his pick of all the nice young ladies.
The king gets his pick of all the nice young ladies.
And then like I said, the guys at the bottom of the totem pole, they can’t even find a single wife to settle down with.
Can't even find a single wife! Poor totem pole guys!
And so we kind of see that today, but for a lot of young men who aren’t, like we were saying earlier, aren’t having sex — and of course we should see that within the confines of marriage,
Of course! Only in traditional marriage with the lights off and hymns playing!
but a lot of men, what do they turn to instead? They turn to porn, they turn to alcohol, they turn to drugs.
When men can't have sex (in traditional marriages) they turn to porn and drinking and drugs. Nobody who is having sex avails themselves of any of these things.
We see the nihilistic mass shooter; plenty of them have been called “incel,” and I know that term’s been used by the left in a weaponized way, and so I don’t mean it like that,
Hate it how "the Left" has stolen the term "incel" and turned it into a bad thing.
but there is even young men who feel angry and hatred toward women.
Yes! They do! Have we veered through all these winding roads and somehow arrived at the correct answer, albeit accidentally?
But again what they’re mad at, and what women should be mad at, is actually the sexual revolution. Because it’s put men and women, actually both of us, in a very bad place.
We have not veered through all these winding roads and somehow arrived at the correct answer, albeit accidentally. Women should be mad at the sexual revolution that gave them all this freedom, because it also caused all these incel mass shootings.
YOU HAPPY NOW, LIBS?
If you've enjoyed today's visit with OAN's Kara McKinney, please enjoy other offerings like "Leftists are the REAL book-burners" and whatever this discussion of gay pride month is, where she talks about the "gross itty-bitty degenerate details" of gays' sex lives and her guest talks about White History Month.
You betcha.
Follow Evan on Twitter right here!
Have you heard that Wonkette DOES NOT EXIST without your donations? Please hear it now, and if you have ever enjoyed a Wonkette article, throw us some bucks, or better yet, SUBSCRIBE!
I Watched A Congressional Candidate's Boring Porn So You Don't Have To (Not That Anyone Does)
NY Congressional hopeful Mike Itkis shared his sex tape for all to see. Or not.
Mike Itkis, is an Independent running for New York's 12th district, hoping to unseat Democratic incumbent Rep. Jerry Nadler. Does he have a chance? Probably not! But let's meet him anyway. A little too much of him, in fact.
Itkis is a 53-year-old Army cyber operations officer running on a platform that so far includes cyber security, ending the war in Ukraine and sex positivity. Among other things, he wants to decriminalize sex work, which is great.
City and State New York reported on Friday that in order to draw attention to his campaign's focus on sex positivity, Itkis had released a "sex tape" he made with pornographic performer Nicole Sage and posted it on PornHub. “If I would just talk about it," Itkis told the outlet, "it wouldn’t demonstrate my commitment to the issue. And the fact I actually did it was a huge learning experience, and it actually influenced items on my platform.”
I admit it. I am absolutely not the kind of person who can read that a guy running for Congress released a "sex tape" and then not go right to PornHub and watch it.
So I did. Sort of.
I say sort of because it was 13 damn minutes long and extremely boring. Like it's a 50-something-year-old bald dude having what appears to be relatively mediocre, perfunctory sex with an attractive young woman who kind of looks like Lindsay Lohan. It was a little like watching somebody's doctor's appointment, so I mostly just skipped around and watched each part for a few seconds.
The weirdest part of it by far is the an interlude in they are suddenly wearing different outfits than they wore in the beginning started in and just kissing for a full minute. It made me very uncomfortable. Watching people have sex is one thing — it's porn, that's what happens in porn. But the kissing is weird. Why would anyone watch other people kiss? Especially for a whole minute.
It's literally just this for a full minute.
The camera angles were definitely a choice as well, one that really did make it look like you were just watching two people having some okay sex after meeting on Ashley Madison. It was far more "literally a sex tape" than a performance.
But maybe that's what he was going for! After all, one of the more ridiculous aspects of our laws regarding sex work is that it is totally legal to have sex for money so long as there is a camera in the room and it will later be posted on the internet for all the world to see, but illegal to have sex for money in private. That does not make sense. It's stupid. Also we all know that decriminalization would make sex work safer for everybody involved but choose not to do it because some people don't want people they don't know having sex for money or paying for sex.
Itkis' campaign website expounds a little bit on what he means by "sex positivity" as a campaign issue:
Sexual rights
- Actively oppose the conservative idea that sex should only happen between a man and a woman who are married to each other
- Right to NOT become a parent in case of pregnancy – redefine abortion debate as a right to unplanned sex
Abortion rights for women
- Men should not be required to support biological children without prior agreement
End government involvement in marriage – no discrimination based on marital status
- Decriminalize sex between consenting adults
- Protect privacy rights
- Define consent
- End adultery laws
- Decriminalize and legalize sex work
Make sexual rights explicit – do NOT rely on privacy or free speech rights
Redefining abortion rights as a right to "unplanned sex" doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but he appears to be trying to express his support for paper abortions without actually using the term "paper abortions." Paper abortions do not actually exist, currently, but if they did, the idea is that they would be some kind of legal way for biological fathers to sever their own parental rights before a child is born, including their obligation to pay child support.
I actually happen to support this — if and only if it is explicitly conditional on abortion being legal, accessible and affordable, along with some other things.
Itkis is not going to win, obviously, but it is actually pretty cool for anyone to run for office while campaigning, to some degree, for sex workers' rights. It's an issue that needs and deserves attention. Maybe if enough random candidates with sex tapes run for office on such platforms and it becomes clear that addressing this issue does not cause the sky to fall, it will be easier for more Democrats to support decriminalization or at least stop supporting bullshit legislation like FOSTA-SESTA.
Not that I ever want to watch that again.
OPEN THREAD!
Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.
Wonkette is independent and fully funded by readers like you. Click below to tip us!
Right Stuff Dating App Flawless Victory, So Much Conservative Hetero Boning Happening Now
Money well invested!
The Right Stuff dating app has been up for a week, and let us tell you, if the reviews are any indicator, this thing that Peter Thiel stuffed his gay money into is going great.
As of this writing, it's rated a '2.1' out of a possible '5' on the Apple app store, and just read what people are saying!
\u201cthe conservatives-only dating app has been released and the reviews are rolling in\u201d— matt (@matt) 1664984566
That first one? One star! It's probably such a good star it doesn't need more stars!
Douglas Roop, 09/30/2022
It's a good app but there's no women?
I love my country. I love the second amendment. And I love God. These days it's hard to find a woman who values my patriotism. My faith. And so after being ghosted by every match on Tinder, I decided to give this app a try. I created my profile, uploaded a selfie of me sitting in my truck with sunglasses, and it worked great. The interface was intuitive and easy to use. But the weird thing is, I couldn't find any women on it. I don't know, maybe the app is bugged? I tried switching my preference to men (just to make sure it was working) and loads of handsome men came up. I hope the developers fix this.
It's great, for conservative guys who don't want to meet women, just very handsome men!
Another review says "No women on this site," and adds "I guess it's just men, then. Ok by me! Gay men: plenty of fish here!"
Indeed, some of the reviews that say that are five-star reviews, so they are satisfied customers!
But back to the one-star reviews!
Here is one that says "Socialist App in Wolves Clothing."
They say their wife died two days ago so it's time to get back out there. But they realized it is a scam and funded by Bill Gates for the purpose of "exterminate all of us conservative Christian's." [sic] What a bummer.
Finally, here are a couple that are pretty sure The Right Stuff is just the feds trying to catch them for January 6-ing. So if that's your kink!
Huh, those are one-star reviews too. Guess that is not their kink.
Oh well, we're sure things will turn around. Conservative dating apps have such a high success rate, after all.
For more, have fun with this thread.
And this is your OPEN THREAD!
Follow Evan on Twitter right here!
Have you heard that Wonkette DOES NOT EXIST without your donations? Please hear it now, and if you have ever enjoyed a Wonkette article, throw us some bucks, or better yet, SUBSCRIBE!