Donate

Why Is Liz Warren Yelling At Bank Regulators Today? (Video)

News

Liz Warren came to Washington to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and she is ALL OUT OF BUBBLEGUM. Would you like to watch her tear into regulators about wrongful foreclosures? Specifically: why no one knows exactly how many people were wrongfully foreclosed on, and also, why wrongfully foreclosed upon people may have gotten as little as $300 for their troubles? Of course you would, these kinds of videos are the highlight of our week too, let us all sit back and relax and bask in the glory of Liz Warren, kicking ass at the Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, courtesy of ThinkProgress.


She starts out all angry-calm:

LIZ: Let me make sure I understand this completely. I  want to know, on a bank-by-bank basis, the number of families that were illegally foreclosed on. Will you give me that information?

(Technically, banks can't do anything illegal, this is a trick question which is why it is so brilliant.)

HAPLESS REGULATOR: Eventually we were going to issue a statement to the public where we provide additional information to the public, but if we go through the processes I described previously, we can share it with Congress in its oversight capacity.

Fun fact: Congress has "oversight capacity" over the banks, learn something new every day!

LIZ: So you're saying you will make that information publicly available?

HAPLESS REGULATOR: I did not say that, I said that we are planning on issuing a public statement that wraps up the IFR.

LIZ: That's not what I'm asking for. What I'm asking for is a bank-by-bank analysis of how many families they illegally foreclosed upon. Will you give us that information?

HAPLESS REGULATOR: We will provide that information to Congress in its oversight capacity if we go through the normal processes that we are prepared to follow.

Another fun fact: it is "normal" to not brief the public on anything relating to their lives. Unless it would help the banks, of course, in which case we assume that it is totally normal to brief the public.

Otherwise, the "normal processes" include: 1. Starting an investigation. 2. Stopping said investigation when it becomes inconvenient. 3. Paying out a pittance to the public. 4. Briefing Congress on the nature of the pittance and 5. Issuing a tepid statement to the people.

We should have gone into politics, it sounds much easier than our lowly blogging job, where even we, mere typists in pajamas (ok fine, we wear frumpy trousers to "work," not pajamas*, but you get the idea) have SOME sort of accountability!

LIZ: Why are you not making that public? I just want to make sure I understand.

REGULATOR: I don't know that there has been a decision not to, I think we're still--

LIZ: Are you claiming that the information about illegal activity is privileged and confidential?

REGULATOR: It's all part of the--it's all confidential supervisory information but that doesn't mean that at some point we won't release some information; a decision just hasn't been made at this point.

LIZ: So you're saying when you find evidence of illegal activities by the banks--

REGULATOR: Yes--

LIZ: That might of illegally foreclosed on homeowners--

REGULATOR: Yes--

LIZ: That information is privileged and you will not release it without a letter from Congress?

[...]

REGULATOR: It is subject to privilege, we don't usually make that public. However, we do plan on making public issuance describing further analysis and further findings.

LIZ: On a bank-by-bank basis of illegal activity?

REGULATOR: I don't believe that has been determined yet.

[...]

LIZ: If someone believes they have been illegally foreclosed against, will they still have a right under this settlement to to bring a lawsuit?

OTHER REGULATOR, RICHARD ASHTON, DPTY GEN COUNSEL, FEDERAL RESERVE: Yes.

LIZ: Would it be helpful, if you’re going against one of these big banks, would it be helpful to these families to have the information about their case that’s in your files?

RICHARD ASHTON, DPTY GEN COUNSEL, FEDERAL RESERVE: It would be helpful, obviously, to have information related to the injury –

LIZ: So do you plan to give the families this information? That is, those families that have been victims of illegal foreclosures, will you be giving them the information that’s in your possession about how the banks illegally foreclosed against them?

RICHARD ASHTON, DPTY GEN COUNSEL, FEDERAL RESERVE: I think that’s a decision that we’re still considering making. We haven’t made a final decision yet.

LIZ: So you have made a decision to protect the banks, but not a decision to tell the families who were illegally foreclosed against?

Yes, OF COURSE THEY HAVE, because whatever would we do without the big banks? Is the economy made of "families"or "workers"? No, of course it is not, it is made of "banks," and we are so lucky to have at least two senators (Liz Warren and Bernie Sanders, if we're counting) who haven't yet realized that.

*Editrix's note: I am totally still in my pajamas.

[ThinkProgress]

Follow Kris E. Benson on Twitter @Kris_E_Benson and you can follow Wonkette on Twitter @wonkette too!

$
Donate with CC

Guys, it's been one more shit day in a shit week in the fifth shit month of another shit Trump year. Which is why I need to remind you that it's not ALL shit out there! Oh, sure, it's MOSTLY shit, but you know what isn't shit? YR WONKETTE, and the strange community of strange internet people who have made getting through all this shit a bit more tolerable, that's who and what. Which is why you should give us money, so we can keep whanging away at the walls of shit with our shovels and laughing at the shit getting all over, because one of these days we will get it all cleaned up or at least not be up to our waists in shit, and we can all laugh about what a crazy fight it was, as St. Molly Ivins always kept reminding us.

In case you're new here, let me just remind you that Wonkette literally got me, Yr Dok Zoom, out of what wasn't quite poverty, but was pretty much paycheck-to-paycheck desperation. I started reading the site shortly before Barack Obama was elected, began commenting sometime in his first term, and submitted a story tip to Rebecca a few months after she bought the site for 47 dollars and a sandwich (I now understand it was a bit more than that). It was Memorial Day 2012, and she wrote back she was busy with some "stupid thing I have to do for some muneez," but would I like to try writing a blog post myself? "I understand if you say FUCK NO. But maybe you are thinking FUCK YES?" And then she warned me she paid only in Ameros. I did, the post was forgettable but OK, and then I wrote a thing (borrowed from now long-lost comments) that went semi-viral, and suddenly I was that hottest thing in publishing, a freelancer!

In less than a year, Rebecca asked you all to buy me to be your very own pet blogger, and my life suddenly became incredibly good, like as good as an Abba song. It's as good as "Dancing Queen." Thanks to the timing of the whole thing (and to Barry Obama and Nancy Pelosi), I actually had health insurance for the first time in years, a not inconsiderable thing. And you had an Editrix who was not working 12 hour days six and a half days a week and drinking too much from stress. Your continued donations helped hire Evan full time and Robyn and Bianca part time and a whole raft of freelancers, and now Rebecca is down to eight-hour days, five and a half days a week, and drinking because there's a madman in the White House and everything's terrible.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

There is a very normal article circulating on the internet right now by a fella named Don Boys (that's not the joke, the jokes are coming), who is both an insane batshit preacher, and also an insane batshit former member of the Indiana House of Representatives. (Also sometimes he blogs at the Daily Caller about how Mike Pence really went balls deep into the gay agenda when he swore in that insane batshit gay guy Rick Grenell as America's ambassador to Germany.)

This article, of course, is about Pete Buttigieg, because what are anti-gay buffoons obsessed with right now? Pete Buttigieg. Boys (still his name) is primarily concerned not with the simple fact that Buttigieg is gay, but with how gay Buttigieg really is. IN THE SEX WAY!

Well, Don, since you asked!

Shall we dive into this thing without the proper prophylactics? We shall.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc