Donate

Well Good Morning to you, post-racial America! I hope you all are ready for this edition of "White Lady Harasses Hard Working Brown Person," because if you aren't, too bad. This is America, Jack, expect one of these nearly every day of the week and twice on Sundays (because Christian Nation), and also expect video because everybody has a smartphone. Even us dark folks, y'all. Technology is totally ruining America for the more covert warriors for racism. Nevertheless, that doesn't seem to stop actual overt Trump fans from cosplaying as Border Patrol agents when they want to harass US citizens who happen to be too brown to be left in peace. Because nothing says "Making America Great Again" better than random white folks acting extra ridiculous when it comes to targeting and profiling darker people who are doing absolutely nothing wrong. So, move aside BBQ Becky -- "Mexican Hating Martha" is dipping her entire body (not just a toe for this bodacious racist) into your racism pool!!!


Esteban Guzman, a US citizen, was minding his own GODDAMN business, as he and his mother were working very hard at a landscaping gig. All of a sudden, a wild unidentified MAGA racist came upon them from the brush, peering through beady little judgmental eyes while accusing them of malicious and dastardly deeds. Guzman and his mother already had enough shit to do that day, and were seriously not interested in being harassed by some rando white lady. Yet they had no choice but to engage because she refused to go away; she was on the prowl for some "Mexican Rapist Drug Dealers" and she would not take "leave me alone" for an answer. You make be asking yourself a very pertinent question like, "Who would be stupid enough to confront a violent rapist drug dealing landscaper?" which makes perfect sense because it would not be smart.

Kenidra Woods, a black teen activist, posted video showing a portion of that encounter on her Twitter thread where she discussed her upcoming anti-gun rally in St. Louis on June 30, 2018 (which St. Louis Wonkers should completely attend even though it is the same day as the immigration protests; help a young lady out!):


From Newsweek:

"I don't know why you hate us," Guzman said in the video. "Why do you hate us?"
"Because you're Mexicans," she responded.
"Because we're Mexicans?" Guzman said. "We're honest people right here."
"Yeah, rapists. And animals," the woman said. "Drug dealers."


As you can see, that lady clearly said she hated him for being Mexican, accused him of being a rapist, and also a drug dealer. Unbeknownst to that racist lady in the video, Mr. Guzman has never been convicted of rape or drug dealing, and also recently graduated from college -- at the excellent Cal Poly, if that makes a difference and probably doesn't -- and likely has his shit together far better than she does. It was obvious that she had no fear he was about to become a bodice ripping savage and try to feed her meth while yelling at her in Spanish, so, really, did she have any actual reason to bother this hardworking gentleman?

The fact that she was bothering him with the dedication of a troll on a bridge proves something entirely different than the "Mexicans are scary drug dealing rapists!" narrative with which she came into that encounter. Instead, it just proves she had absolutely no fear that he would do a damn thing to her white ass while she insulted and harassed him and HIS MAMA on CAMERA. My assessment is that she felt damn proud of herself for unleashing her racist MAGABEAST on an innocent man and his poor mother who are working their fingers to the bone to try to scratch out a piece of the American Dream for themselves. They are literally making their own bootstraps while this Trump-loving weirdo runs free waiting to stalk unsuspecting brown people. But, don't call Trump voters racist!!! That would be uncivil.

Somehow the pundits who are all breathlessly opining about how shameful it is that liberals are NOT CIVIL ENOUGH seem to miss the fact that DARK PEOPLE get treated like shit everyday by REPUBLICANS. This American racist woman literally name-dropped Trump while she was racially targeting and abusing this family. WILL ANY OF THEM MENTION THAT FACT?? I wonder why we never see new those civility loving pundits buying smelling salts when immigrants are hounded by MAGA Trolls in public places. Maybe all of the pundits who are so aghast at the very idea that Americans are responding negatively to Trump officials because of how they treat immigrants can find a better way to use their time. Like actually defending the oppressed. Would be nice.

June 30 is right around the corner, and there are more than 130 immigration rallies planned nationwide. Plus, Kenidra's on how high school gun violence is killing black kids. Let's rally at BOTH.

[Newsweek/Yahoo Finance/The Project for Women/CNN]

Wonkette is completely supported by readers. Don't be an asshole and donate today!

Wonderbitch

Wonderbitch aka Bravenak aka Bianca DeLaRosa, loves her jobs as Social Media Manager for Wonkette more than Sarah Huckabee Sanders loves lying to America. Bianca also moonlights as a Witch (THE BAD KIND!!) and is a Freelance Goddess of All Things Ever. Be very nice her because she likes to curse people, especially mean people.

$
Donate with CC

OOH BOY HOWDY, The Federalist is on fire this week! Just this morning we told you about the hilarious Federalist column where one neo-Nazi's mom and dad are Democrats, ipso facto QED NEO-NAZIS ARE THE REAL LIBERALS, FUCKERS! Is America's dumbest woman whose name doesn't rhyme with Cara Snailin' over there being a total fuckin' Mollie Hemingway right now? Sadly, she blocked us on Twitter, so how could we possibly know? The answer is WE DON'T CARE.

But now we have a gem of the Federalist genre, an article written by a whiny-ass gay quisling conservative, who would like to chew on his blankie and whine about how much harder it is out there for a conservative than it is for a gay person. This is a subject we happen to have some knowledge about, because we are super gay! And we know a lot about conservatives, both firsthand -- being subjected to them every single one of our almost four decades of life -- and also from covering extremist right-wing Christians for a very long time. Particularly the kind that tell young, impressionable, vulnerable gay kids that they need to pray away the gay if they want Jesus to exercise some self control and refrain from sending them to a fiery hell for all eternity.

We clicked on the article with high hopes. See if you can spot why:

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
pic via Glamour Shots, we mean this dude's old website

The House Education and Workforce Committee was all set to have a hearing today all about the horrors that a higher minimum wage would wreak on the economy. Horrors like rich people being slightly less rich. Horrors like business owners claiming they will have to fire people and charge $15 for a McChicken if forced to pay workers a living wage, which they won't actually do because no one will buy a $15 McChicken and they would go out of business if they tried that, and they already don't hire more people than the bare minimum they can get away with. Horrors like poor people not being "motivated" to work harder and get better jobs that do not pay them an amount no human being could possibly live on.

Alas, as Politico reports, it was not to be, as committee members discovered their big witness for the hearing, San Diego State University economist Joseph Sabia (pictured above in a Glamour Shot from his archived website), was kind of a wacko.

Sabia, as it turns out, once had a blog called "No Shades Of Gray," in which he wrote many columns of an extremely homophobic and sexist persuasion. In one of these columns, in 2002, Sabia was very mad about one man's lawsuit against several fast food giants for contributing to his health and obesity problems by failing to disclose the nutritional information of the food they sold. In retrospect, I think most people are now on board with these chains being required to post calorie counts and other nutritional information, but in 2002, Sabia was convinced that requiring them to do this would be an assault on freedom for all Americans everywhere. His response to this was to try and attempt a Jonathan Swift posture and suggest taxing gay sex, which he claimed leads to "disastrous health consequences."

Because sure, that's the same thing, basically.


In gay sex, we have an activity that is clearly leading to disastrous health consequences. What rational person would engage in this sort of activity? There is only one solution - let's tax it.

"Come on, Sabia," you say, "how are you going to enforce these taxes? Are you going to send government officials to peep into everyone's bedroom?"

Eventually. But first we have to mount the assault on Big Gay (no, I am not talking about Rosie O'Donnell). We can tax gay nightclubs, websites, personal ads, sexual paraphernalia, and so forth. Talk about a sin tax!!! We can cripple gay-related industries and get them right where we want them. All gay clubs will have to feature huge, flashing warning signs like "CAUTION: Entering this nightclub may increase your chance of contracting STDs and dying."

Big Gay clearly lures people into trying their "product" without discussing the risks to mind, body, and soul. The average Joe on the street does not understand all of the possible bad outcomes. I can almost hear him now:

"They said '100 percent hotties.' I thought that meant it was fun. I thought gay sex was OK…Now I have all these diseases. Big Gay has wrecked my life."

In the immoral words of Warren G, "Regulators!! Mount up!"

EXTREME SHUDDER.

In another 2002 article, classily titled "College Girls: Unpaid Whores," Sabia laments that feminists have led college girls to stop trying to be like the Holy Virgin Mary and instead to aspire to be more like that hussy Ally McBeal.

No, really.

As women have strayed from the church, they have replaced what is holy with what is temporally pleasing. For Catholics, the model woman is Mary, the virgin Mother of God. She is beloved by the faithful for her unflappable devotion to and trust in God, her nurturing of the Son of Man, and her deep love for all humanity.

Today's college girl looks to Ally McBeal, the trollops of Sex in the City, and the floozies on Friends to set their moral compasses.

The sad truth is that college girls are so desperate to find love that they are willing to degrade themselves to get it. But true love can only be understood in the context of the Word of God. Any other notion of "love" is secular and, by definition, limited and finite.

Not only that, but instead of going to college to find a husband, they have boyfriends. Boyfriends they have S-E-X with. And sometimes, not even that. Sometimes they have sex with people just because they want to have sex with people, and not even in exchange for Valentine's Day cards or money!


Additionally, other sex-based relationships have become commonplace. In recent years, a new and disturbing arrangement known as "friends with benefits" has emerged. In this arrangement, men are not even forced to perform the normal duties of boyfriends, i.e. flowers, Valentine's Day cards, rides to the abortion clinic, etc. Instead, girls consider these guys "just friends" whom they happen to screw every now and again. No strings, no attachments, no dinners. Just sex when they feel like it.

This type of arrangement is the next logical step in the direction that young women have drifted in the last few decades. These women have become unpaid whores. At least prostitutes made a buck off of their trade. These women just give it away.

How cute! He was like the ur-incel, basically.

Anyway, following the discovery of the posts, the House Education and Workforce Committee's GOP communications director Kelley McNabb told Politico that "members were uncomfortable moving forward on the hearing." A more optimistic person might think this was a step forward, that maybe those committee members actually thought it was bad to suggest that being gay means being a disease-ridden monster or that college girls are whores, but it's probably more to avoid embarrassment than anything else. Guess they'll have to start from scratch and find a crappy economist who will tell them what they want to hear about the minimum wage but who doesn't have an embarrassing Geocities blog in their past. Good luck with that!

[Politico]

Wonkette is independent and fully funded by readers like you. Click below to tip us!

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc