Donate

During Sunday's "Meet The Press" on NBC, on the same Very Special Episode where he let Danielle "I'm not a scientist but I also don't play one on TV" Pletka jaw about climate change, Check Todd decided to explain why he will never let go of the "No Blue Wave" myth he's spun about the 2018 midterms. He began by conceding why IT WAS a Blue Wave:

So what's the deal? Well, Democrats are going to net at least 38 seats in the House. And with two GOP-held seats still undecided, it's possible the Democrats could get up to 40. Historically, that's big. The last time Democrats gained this many seats in a midterm was 1974, the post-Watergate election. One point for team wave.

Democrats also won the national House popular vote by a whopping 8.9 million votes, 53-45, eight points. In the GOP's last two wave elections, '94 and 2010, Republicans won the popular vote by a smaller margin. So that's another point for team wave.

And had Todd stopped there, we'd be fine. Thanks for admitting your election night error and at least a correction. But this is Chuck Todd. And much like how he ruined goatees for everyone except Stone Cold Steve Austin, he had to ruin this too.


But was it a wave? Maybe not. Republicans knocked off Democratic senators in North Dakota, Missouri, Florida and Indiana while losing only in Arizona and Nevada. As of now, they're plus two in the upper chamber. A real wave should have saved two or three of those vulnerable incumbent Democrats, and two of them lost by six points each. Point for team no wave.

There were also some high-profile losses for the Democrats, nail-biters in Georgia's governor race, in Florida's governor and Senate races all went to the Republicans. Plus in Ohio, Democrats lost every big race, except for hanging onto Sherrod Brown's seat, and they hung onto that by a smaller-than-expected margin. All points for no wave.

My reaction watching Chuck Todd personified by Stone Cold Steve Austin media3.giphy.com

No, Chuck! There was a massive wave. As political director for NBC News, you should know this, but the Senate is that Republicans had the most favorable election map:

And even with this map -- see Democrats having to play defense, while almost no Republicans had to hold their seats? -- the GOP almost lost Texas, Georgia and Florida and did lose Nevada and Arizona. The fact that it was "nail biters" in ruby red Texas and Georgia does not discount that. The fact that Andrew Gillum, who would have been the first African-American governor of Florida, or Stacey Abrams, who would have been the first African-American woman governor in the ENTIRE history of the United States, could not overcome large swaths of racism and systematic voting fraud/purges/disenfranchisement to win does not disprove the "Blue Wave." And while you mention Ohio, you also fail to mention the entire takeover of Democrats in California and Maine. Plus, as favorable as the map was in 2018 for Republicans, it's the opposite in 2020 (Bye, Susan Collins!).

Then Chuck Todd went for the last refuge of lazy TV journalism, "Both Sides":

Look, there are strong points for both sides of this argument. And the strongest point for the pro-wave side are the House results, coast to coast. But it may be more accurate to describe this election as a realignment, not only because of the results in states like Missouri, Ohio, Indiana, Florida and Georgia but because of the strong turnout for both parties. In a wave election, one side usually stays home, demoralized. That didn't happen in 2018.

Except, Chuck, you are also discounting that the voter turnout for this election hit a 50-year high. Conservatives always turn out big in midterm elections but it was the energized "Blue Wave" that allowed this midterm turnout to be high enough to almost rival a presidential election.


And while Chuck Todd (and some too prideful or egotistical, we mean YOU, NEW YORK TIMES) will still deny it for either ratings or to not lose face, somewhere in a Senate office Mitch McConnell saw that and is in fear of his impeding pain in 2020. Somewhere in his hole where a soul should be, Donald Trump sees this. It's why they are working hard to save a Senate seat in Mississippi. Fucking Mississippi!
In conclusion, this is excellent news for John McCain.

Wonkette has NO ADS and NO MYSTERY FUNDERS. Just $5 or $10 or $100 a month from PEOPLE LIKE YOU! Help us pay the people, piper!

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Michael Mora

Pop Culture observer & Comics fan. Amateur Movie Reviewer. Political Freelance Writer @wonkette. Marine, Husband & Dad. Opinions are mine only.

$
Donate with CC

We want to say right here at the outset that we hate Julian Assange. Aside from the sexual assault allegations against him, and aside from the fact that he's just a generally stinky and loathsome person who reportedly smeared poop on the walls at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, while reportedly not taking care of his cat, an innocent creature, he acted as Russia's handmaiden during the 2016 election, in order to further Russia's campaign to steal it for Donald Trump. All signs point to his campaign being a success!

So we are justifiably happy when bad things happen to Julian Assange. We are happy his name is shit the world over, and that any reputation WikiLeaks used to have for being on the side of freedom and transparency has been stuffed down the toilet where it belongs. We are happy he looked like such a sad-ass loser when the Ecuadorian embassy finally kicked him out and he was arrested.

And quite frankly, we were OK with the initial charge against him recently unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia. If you'll remember, he was charged with trying to help Chelsea Manning hack a password into the Defense Department, which is not what journalists do. Journalists do not drive the get-away car for sources. Journalists do not hold their sources' hair back while they're stealing classified intel. Assange is essentially accused of doing all that.

Now, put all that aside. Because -- and this is key -- journalists do publish secrets they are provided by sources. That's First Amendment, chapter and verse, American as fucking apple pie and fast-food-induced diabetes. And that is what much of the superseding indictment of Assange unsealed yesterday was about. (And nope, it wasn't about anything regarding Assange's ratfucking the 2016 election or Hillary's emails. Why would the Trump Justice Department prosecute anything about that? It's all about the older Chelsea Manning stuff, the stuff the Obama Justice Department considered charging Assange with, but ultimately declined, because of that little thing called the First Amendment.)

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Video screenshot

The pharmaceutical giant Gilead Sciences, Inc. -- heck of a name for these times -- recently announced US sales of a generic version of its HIV prevention drug Truvada would begin a year earlier than originally planned. The stepped-up schedule for the generic was at least in part the result of pressure from activists, who have made a lot of noise about the fact that Gilead's huge revenues from Truvada -- about $3 billion annually -- came only after the basic research for the drug was done at taxpayer expense, largely through grants from the Centers for Disease Control, which holds the patent on the drug.

At a House Oversight Committee hearing last week, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez let one of the witnesses, Gilead CEO Daniel O'Day, know she wasn't personally blaming him or his greed for the high cost of the drug, which prevents the spread of HIV through "pre-exposure prophylaxis" (PrEP). No, that's all a result of the terrible incentives that come from the fact that the US, alone among developed countries, treats healthcare as a commodity, not a right for all. Which is why a monthly supply of Truvada costs nearly $1800 here, and roughly eight dollars in Australia.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc