Donate

Paul Ryan Wants To Kill Just A Few More Poor People, For Old Times' Sake

Post-Racial America

Republicans have long been concerned that "big government" insists on depriving poor people of their God-given freedom o die from starvation. House Speaker Paul Ryan is set to retire before 50 but on his way to that big lobbying firm in the sky, Ryan's GOP has one more hurting to put on Broke-Ass Americans.

Back in June, the House passed the Farm Bill, which actually does not guarantee each American a farm but does contain lots of nasty measures aimed at screwing poor people to Ryan's climactic satisfaction. There's currently a stalemate in the Senate because Democrats have their flaws but they won't back this Scrooge Act. However, lame-duck Ryan won't budge on his bill's proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (aka SNAP or food stamps) because he's just that much of a heartless asshole.

Let's look at some of these changes as hungry people with big eyes stare sadly at us. First up is a "provision" that would cut off SNAP benefits for people who have committed certain violent crimes, even though they've completed their prison sentences. The current law, which expires in September, only cuts off those who violate their parole or the terms of their release. The change would affect 100,000 people leaving prison each year or, to use Donald Trump's "hurricane math," just one "bad hombre" named Floyd.


Re-entering society after incarceration is already difficult. Annual income just after release from prison is roughly $6,500 -- not euros, mind you, but practically useless American dollars. Shredding the safety net increases the odds that they will make bad choices out of desperation that lands them back in prison, where in a twist worthy of O. Henry, they will again receive three taxpayer-funded meals a day. We're apparently OK with keeping bellies full when the recipients of government largesse are helping private prisons turn a profit.

Oh, right, black people are imprisoned at five times the rate of whites, so this is yet another one of those policies that ding the melanin-having in the name of "law and order." I've been accused in comments of "black nationalism," so I'll do my best Michael Stipe impression and try to focus on how "everybody hurts" in the Ryan bill, which also features punitive, insulting changes to SNAP's work requirements.

Those subject to the sweeping new requirements would be required to attend, document, and verify at least 20 hours of work or training activities each week in order to maintain their food assistance, putting food assistance at risk for up to 8 million people. Most SNAP recipients who can work already do, meaning this bill tries to solve a problem that doesn't exist. Recipients would be forced to constantly complete paperwork proving they're meeting the work requirement, an especially onerous demand for people who have multiple jobs and family responsibilities.

Conservatives are convinced that food assistance recipients are freeloading deadbeats. They insist that unless you light the fire of malnutrition under poor folks, they'll lack the motivation to go out and get that well-paying job from the 1950s before Republicans broke the unions. If anything, they'll only be satisfied if the poor are documenting their not-so-gainful employment in journals like lovesick teenagers: "THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13: Met a job today. It was dreamy. I'm making $5.65 an hour, so I think the job kinda likes me. I mean, it's not paying anyone any more ... but it's also not paying anyone any less because it's against the law. I wish I could figure it out."

SNAP recipients who do meet work requirements often find themselves in the unfortunate position where they make too much to qualify for continued assistance but not enough to keep eating regularly without it. People have lost benefits because they had a savings account like some fancy Rockefeller. This is known as a "benefit cliff" and most states had addressed that with broad based categorical eligibility (BBCE) options. However, the GOP's farm bill will eliminate most BBCE in very narrow circumstances, which would affect about 400,000 households because apparently we never fully appreciated cliffs. Didn't you ever watch a Wile E. Coyote cartoon?

The GOP might relent on the SNAP changes -- not because their hearts suddenly tripled in size but because they've been able to negotiate a hostage release type situation where they leave SNAP alone in return for giving wealthy farmers more crop subsidies and turning a blind eye on the regulation of pesticides that might blind people.

This all seems needlessly cruel but the Republicans believe in "fiscal responsibility" and someone's got to pay for those tax cuts for rich people. As Betsy DeVos would say from whatever mansion or yacht she's at now, "Baby needs a new pair of everything."

Follow SER on Twitter

Wonkette is solely funded by about one percent of its readers every month. JOIN THE TEAM, so we can fund our food and shelter habits.

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Stephen Robinson

Stephen Robinson is a writer and social kibbitzer based in Seattle. However, he's more reliable for food and drink recommendations in Portland, where he spends a lot of time for theatre work.

$
Donate with CC

If it's a day, the New York Times is fucking shit up, but today, it fucked up BIGLY.

Fresh-faced access journalists Adam Goldman and Michael Schmidt have just published what we can only describe as a drive-by shooting against Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, which reads as some bullshit planted by the White House to give Donald Trump the pretext for his Saturday Night Massacre, if he wants it. (He does.)

Maybe the White House is tired of talking about the flailing nomination of Judge Maybe Rapey and how Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen are cooperating with special counsel Robert Mueller, and the New York Times was more than happy to help!

Or maybe it was planted by former deputy director of the FBI Andrew McCabe, who was fired by Attorney General Jeff Sessions just hours before his pension was set to kick in, and may have a serious axe to grind with DoJ officials and leaked a copy of his own memos. (His lawyer says that's not true, but he would say that, wouldn't he?)

Or maybe it's both, somehow! Or one of many other things!

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

It's not every day Golf Digest gets noticed as a source of hard-hitting investigative journalism, at least outside of reviews of titanium carbon fiber nanotech infinite improbability drivers or some such. But Wednesday, some journamalisming that started with a Golf Digest story about a guy who drew fantastic imaginary golf courses concluded with that guy, Valentino Dixon, walking out of Attica prison, 27 years after he'd been sentenced for 39 years to life. Not bad, Golf Digest. We give you a GOLF CLAP. And a Pulitzer if we had one, which, sadly, we don't.

As Golf Digest says, the twists and turns of the case are a bit complex (they're unraveled in more detail in this New York Times story), but it basically comes down to a local prosecutor who was determined to railroad Dixon for the 1991 murder of a 17-year-old, Torriano Jackson, in Buffalo, New York. The conviction involved

shoddy police work, zero physical evidence linking Dixon, conflicting testimony of unreliable witnesses, the videotaped confession to the crime by another man, a public defender who didn't call a witness at trial, and perjury charges against those who said Dixon didn't do it.

Dixon had a prior conviction for selling cocaine, and he made a convenient target for Erie County prosecutor Chris Belling, who was weirdly determined to ignore even statements from the actual killer, LaMarr Scott, who pleaded guilty to the killing shortly before Dixon's release this week.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc