You know what we could all use today? Some good news! Luckily, New Jersey Senator and very handsome man Cory Booker is here with some!

Today, Booker announced plans for a Federal Jobs Guarantee Development Act, which would guarantee a full-time federal government job paying at least $15 and providing health care and paid sick/family leave for any adult that needs one. This would start with a three year pilot program in 15 local areas, selected by the Department of Labor, and, if successful, be expanded throughout the United States.

Expanded nationally, this would ensure that every American who wants a job has a job, and that they have a job they can survive on -- something that yes, people ought to be entitled to.

There are other benefits as well. If the government were to guarantee $15 an hour jobs with benefits to everyone who wanted them, private sector employers would have to raise their wages and benefits in order to attract and keep employees. It would also provide a counter to the unfortunate fact that employers are more likely to hire white employees and non-disabled employees, and provide jobs for those who have been cut out of the job market due to discriminatory hiring.

The Act is based on ideas long advocated by economists Mark Paul, William Darity, Jr. and Darrick Hamilton, and pushed for by Jesse Jackson during his presidential run in 1984.

As Dylan Matthews of Vox points out, a similar program in India, the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, was found to not only increase household earnings for low-income households, both in the private and public sector, but also to increase employment overall in the private sector.

This sounds counterintuitive, right? Shouldn't a program like this decrease employment in the private sector? Shouldn't all those private businesses, now practically forced to pay higher wages to their employees, hire fewer people? But the thing is, this program meant that more people had more money to spend than they did previously, and when people have more money to spend, businesses need more employees and can afford to pay them.

Would a program like this be expensive? Yes, it would! The plan proposed by Paul, Darrity and Hamilton for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates its cost at $543 billion a year. This cost, however, would be offset by the boost to the economy (which would increase tax revenue) as well as a decrease in the funds needed for social programs. Additionally, these jobs would likely be jobs that benefit all Americans -- providing childcare, infrastructure development and other things that would improve our way of life. Essentially, it would pay for itself in the end.

This is a smart thing for Booker to be doing, especially if he plans to run in 2020 as we all assume he will. His close ties to Wall Street, support for school vouchers and vote against importing cheaper prescription drugs from Canada has cost him serious progressive street cred. In fact, the whole prescription drug thing led me, personally, to call off our wedding entirely. Which was very sad because we would be such an attractive couple.

By embracing Medicare-for-all and programs like this one, Booker balances his act and broadens his overall appeal. Being as beloved (and handsome) as he is, he's also in a unique position to advocate for a few progressive ideas here and there in a way that won't totally piss off and alienate centrist/mainstream Dems. In fact, I've got my fingers crossed that he'll start pushing for an end to at-will employment next. GO, CORY, GO!

This is a good and exciting idea, and that's something the Democrats need to be doing a lot more of if they want to kick Trump the fuck out of the White House in 2020. While there are many lessons to be learned from the horror of 2016, one of them is that progressive ideas are not as vastly unappealing as centrists have been insisting they are lo the past... since NAFTA, at least. It's time to start getting creative and a little radical and presenting ideas that people can get seriously jazzed about. We all need that light at the end of the tunnel right now.


Wonkette is fully funded by readers like you! Click here to tip us!

Robyn Pennacchia

Robyn Pennacchia is a brilliant, fabulously talented and visually stunning angel of a human being, who shrugged off what she is pretty sure would have been a Tony Award-winning career in musical theater in order to write about stuff on the internet. Previously, she was a Senior Staff Writer at Death & Taxes, and Assistant Editor at The Frisky (RIP). Currently, she writes for Wonkette, Friendly Atheist, Quartz and other sites. Follow her on Twitter at @RobynElyse

Donate with CC

NO. IT CAN'T BE! Does the Republican-led United States Senate have ... a limit? Is there somehow a line they won't cross in this era of "Let's just go along with whatever Batshit McBigMac up there at 1600 Pennsylvania says and who cares if we destroy America in the process?" Turn out the answer to that question is maybe, and the limit is apparently when the crown prince of Saudi Arabia bone saws a Washington Post journalist to death and the president and the secretaries of State and Defense lie about it to their faces.

Senators do not like being lied to, no matter what party they're in. (Unless they're Chuck Grassley and it's Trump people lying about Russia and they're dangling sweet, delicious corn cobs in front of his face. Or if it's Lindsey Graham, when Trump's mouth is open. But otherwise they hate it.)

The Senate has been holding hearings and offering strongly worded resolutions aimed at forcing Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to take responsibility for the Jamal Khashoggi murder, and also stop genociding the fuck out of Yemen and blockading Qatar and kidnapping the Lebanese prime minister and jailing dissidents, and SO ON. In short, the consensus is that MBS is out of goddamn control and needs to be reined in, yesterday.

On Thursday, the Senate followed that up WITH VOTES. Indeed, the Senate voted unanimously to blame MBS for the murder. (Right here, we are using the definition of "unanimously" that means ALL OF THEM, KATIE, because that is what "unanimously" always means.)

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC
CBP Photo, McAllen, Texas, June 2018

A seven-year-old Guatemalan girl died of dehydration and shock after she and other migrants turned themselves in to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents in the New Mexico desert last week, and that's America now, Merry Christmas (NOT "happy holidays," because this is a Christian nation, goddammit). The girl began having seizures about eight hours after she and her father were taken into custody by CBP near Lordsburg, New Mexico. Emergency responders got her on a helicopter to a hospital in El Paso, but she died the next day.

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)


©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc