Judicial Watch And Gateway Pundit Gonna GIT HER NOW!!!
You know who 'her' is. Don't play stupid with us.
Now that we've finally finished all that fake Rusher situation with Rusher and Trump, the Stupidest Man on the Internet's Stupid website brings us a reason to hope for a better tomorrow! Judicial Watch, the pests who keep filling the courts with pointless lawsuits aimed at exposing all Hillary Clinton's crimes and murders and more crimes, is suing the government for records that will prove once and for all that China got all of Hillary's emails! If that sounds vaguely familiar, it's because Yr Evan Hurst wrote about it last summer when Donald Trump was mad-tweeting about it. It was nonsense, but VERY INCRIMINATING NONSENSE all the same! Here are the details, which are actually just riveting proof of not much of anything!
In July of last year, Louie Gohmert yelled at FBI agent Peter Strzok about ALL BUT FOUR of the emails on Hillary's private server being copied and delivered to a Chinese-owned company, according to one Frank Rucker, an official with the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community (ICIG). Nobody remembers it because that question preceded Gohmert's shouty HOW DARE YOU EVEN LOOK AT ME WITH THE FACE YOU LIED TO YOUR WIFE ABOUT ADULTERY FACE, YOU FACE-HAVER! tirade. But here, Gohmert's so proud of his performance he keeps it on his YouTube:
Gohmert Grills Strzok on Bias & Emails Sent To Unauthorized Source youtu.be
Gohmert insisted Rucker had briefed Strzok about an "anomaly" on Clinton's private server that Strzok had clearly failed to follow up on, shame on him. According to Gohmert, Rucker told Strzok that forensic computer dudes had found "an anomaly on Hillary Clinton's emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000 of them, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list [...] It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia." Gohmert went on to berate Strzok for doing nothing about that important information, then went off on his adultery rant, and finally, after all that, Strzok said he had no idea what the hell had gotten into Gohmert's asparagus. He said he recalled meeting Rucker, but nothing about Gohmert's claims.
Gohmert also insisted the Justice Department's Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, "got a call four times from someone wanting to brief him about this, and he never returned the call," because of course everyone in the Deep State was covering it up or something.
In fact, the cover-up has been so complete you probably never heard about any of this, even though the highly respected Daily Caller Journalism Apparatus also ran a story about it, with anonymous "sources"! Two of them!
Well now the brave investigators at Judicial Watch are going to sue the government for ALL THE TRUTH, according to flower-forehead lady at the Gateway Pundit! According to its lawsuit, Judicial Watch sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence last July, and apart from a letter acknowledging the request in August, got no satisfaction, so now it's time to sue. Here's the VERY IMPORTANT EVIDENCE the group wants:
Any and all records regarding, concerning, or related to the meeting between Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) official Frank Rucker, ICIG attorney Jeanette Macmillian, former Federal Bureau of Investigation Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok, and other[s] regarding security threats associated with the private e-mail server utilized by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. This request includes, but is not limited to, the following:
• Any and all reports, notes, briefing materials, presentations, or similar records created in preparation for, during, and/or pursuant to the meeting.
• Any all Any and all [sic] related records of communication between any official, employee, or representative of the ICIG and any other individual or entity.
You know, if it happened at all, although heaven knows Louie Gohmert wouldn't make something like that up, and although the FBI said, in response to the Daily Caller story, it had "not found any evidence" of an intrusion of Clinton's server. But maybe there was an intrusion they didn't find, HUH?
We'll be sure to keep you on top of this very important story, since, as Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said in a press release quoted at real journalism sources Gateway Pundit and Daily Caller too,
Our lawsuit could further expose how anti-Trump activists like disgraced FBI official Peter Strzok bent over backwards to protect Hillary Clinton from having to answer for her national security crimes.
Or it could prove jack shit, as many FOIA fishing expeditions do. The important thing is that Hillary Clinton will finally face either justice or a lot more angry tweets, and either is just fine. The Gateway Pundit even very generously offers a link for its Lock Her Up ravers to send a nice donation to Judicial Watch. Isn't that sweet of them?
[ Gateway Pundit / Daily Caller / Photo: The Vault of the Space Age on Tumblr ]
Yr Wonkette is supported by reader donations. Please send us money and we won't tell the Chinese bupkis about nothing.
Well that was some fine whataboutism, and not even really sure you even understand the points people are making. I mean by all means keep recycling shitty talking points.Single-payer will probably not come to pass, but I'm not really sure why you are including that.As for the LGBT thing, she's changed, and as a member of the LGBT community this is a non-issue. Go cry about it to someone else.Super predators she apologized for, and as for the crime bill, Sanders and the black community were all for it, so again seems dumb.Libya, honestly the guy was an asshole, pretty glad he's gone, but by all means whine about that.
The story is about Hillary, not whataboutism. Stay on point.
Vowing to support neocon and Republican policy, like Romneycare and political assassinations, is about Hillary's very own words. Didn't you read her emails?
African Americans were NOT in support of being targeted with more harsh punishments and being called "superpredators". Don't be absurd!
Hillary was campaigning for bigotry and AGAINST marriage equality within three months of of the Supreme Court reversing bigoted policy. Which do you believe, what she said after the SC ruling or what she said all of her life, "Marriage will ALWAYS be between one man and one woman,"? Her opinion and vow was "ALWAYS".
None so blind....