OH, MARY! Russian spy Mariia Butina is about to sing, and we don't mean "Beauty and the Beast." ABC and The Daily Beast have seen copies of Butina's plea deal, which will be finalized in a DC district court tomorrow. They report that Butina has a full cooperation agreement, meaning she'll tell federal prosecutors all about the Russian plan to murder the Magnitsky sanctions by becoming BFFs with the NRA. HOW YOU LIVIN', DANA LOESCH?

According to ABC, Butina will plead to a conspiracy charge of acting as a covert foreign agent who got in bed with the gunhumpers and godbotherers so she could sweet talk the Republicans who come to sell their asses discuss national policy.

But now, according to the agreement, Butina has acknowledged that with U.S. Person 1's assistance, she drafted a proposal called "Description of the Diplomacy Project" in March of 2015 which was later sent to the Russian Official, in which she said that she had already "laid the groundwork for an unofficial channel of communication with the next U.S. administration" and requested $125,000 from a Russian billionaire to attend conferences and meetings to further develop those ties. The Russian Official, the agreement said, confirmed that her proposal would be at least partially supported.

The government has alleged that U.S. Person 1 "worked with Butina to arrange introductions to U.S. persons having influence in American politics," including high-ranking members of the National Rifle Association and organizers of the National Prayer Breakfast, that would ultimately give her a surprising level of access to conservative politicians, including — in one memorable interaction captured on video — to then-candidate Donald Trump.

US Person 1 would be Butina's 56-year-old boyfriend Paul Erickson, who The Daily Beast reports just received a target letter stating that he's under investigation for violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act. And for being the absolute worst spy ever. Tell us, ABC!

"Unrelated to specific presidential campaigns," Erickson wrote in an October 2016 email to an acquaintance that was later obtained by the FBI, "I've been involved in securing a VERY private line of communication between the Kremlin and key [unnamed political party] leaders through, of all conduits, the [unnamed gun-rights organization]."

And during an FBI raid of Erickson's South Dakota home, investigators discovered a handwritten note suggesting Erickson may have been aware of a possible job offer from Russian intelligence services: "How to respond to FSB offer of employment?" Erickson scratched, an apparent reference to the Russian equivalent of the CIA.

SLICK. Did he also write, "Set up shell company, conspire with Russia to ratfuck American election, and order more bootleg Cialis"?

The Russian Official is Alexander Torshin, who noped out of his position as deputy governor of Russia's central bank two weeks ago when word of Butina's plea negotiations began to leak. Torshin is personally under a fuckton of sanctions and would looooove to get back into the international banking system where he can turn those creaky, old rubles into shiny, clean greenbacks. His buddy Putin would give him ever so many wet, sloppy kisses! So far, NO DICE. But no polonium tea, falling out a window, or car accident either, so ... still a net positive!

Hey, remember that time in July 2015 where Butina reached out to Trump flack Sam Nunberg asking for facetime with Trump at the conservative FreedomFest in Las Vegas, and when she couldn't get a meeting, she just showed up anyway and happened to get called on to ask a question about sanctions?

Trump answers question on Russia at FreedomFest 2015

If you will be elected as president, what will be your foreign politics especially in the relationships with my country? And do you want to continue the politics of sanctions that are damaging of both economy? Or you have any other ideas?

Spoiler alert: Donald Trump loves Putin, does not love sanctions.


Shall we take a few wild guesses what other amazing coincidences Ms. Butina might be talking to federal prosecutors about?

  • Was Butina just freelancing when she arranged a trip to Moscow in December 2015 for a delegation of NRA members, or was it part of a Kremlin-coordinated influence plan?
  • Was some portion of the broke-ass NRA's $30 million spending on the 2016 campaign underwritten by their Russian pals, either directly or through straw-man donors, aside from the $2,500 they've already copped to receiving?
  • How did Butina wind up in a scheme with former NRA head David Keene and his wife to import seventy thousand tons of Russian jet fuel?
  • Was there message coordination between the NRA and Russian troll farmers, or was it just a happy accident that they flogged the same poisonous shit?
  • Were there undisclosed contacts between Torshin and members of the Trump campaign?
  • And, most importantly, was it really true love between the Russian hottie and aging US Person 1? Or was Butina using Erickson for his connections?

Ah, well. We'll always have our memories.

Go to jail. Both of you. And stay there.

[ABC / The Daily Beast / WaPo / MoJo]

Follow your FDF on Twitter!

Please click here to fund your Wonkette. At least until we find ourselves a handsome, GOP sugardaddy to pay all our bills, we're relying on YOU.

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Five Dollar Feminist

Your FDF lives in Baltimore under an assumed identity as an upstanding member of the PTA. Shhh, don't tell anyone she makes swears on the internet!

Donate with CC

We want to say right here at the outset that we hate Julian Assange. Aside from the sexual assault allegations against him, and aside from the fact that he's just a generally stinky and loathsome person who reportedly smeared poop on the walls at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, while reportedly not taking care of his cat, an innocent creature, he acted as Russia's handmaiden during the 2016 election, in order to further Russia's campaign to steal it for Donald Trump. All signs point to his campaign being a success!

So we are justifiably happy when bad things happen to Julian Assange. We are happy his name is shit the world over, and that any reputation WikiLeaks used to have for being on the side of freedom and transparency has been stuffed down the toilet where it belongs. We are happy he looked like such a sad-ass loser when the Ecuadorian embassy finally kicked him out and he was arrested.

And quite frankly, we were OK with the initial charge against him recently unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia. If you'll remember, he was charged with trying to help Chelsea Manning hack a password into the Defense Department, which is not what journalists do. Journalists do not drive the get-away car for sources. Journalists do not hold their sources' hair back while they're stealing classified intel. Assange is essentially accused of doing all that.

Now, put all that aside. Because -- and this is key -- journalists do publish secrets they are provided by sources. That's First Amendment, chapter and verse, American as fucking apple pie and fast-food-induced diabetes. And that is what much of the superseding indictment of Assange unsealed yesterday was about. (And nope, it wasn't about anything regarding Assange's ratfucking the 2016 election or Hillary's emails. Why would the Trump Justice Department prosecute anything about that? It's all about the older Chelsea Manning stuff, the stuff the Obama Justice Department considered charging Assange with, but ultimately declined, because of that little thing called the First Amendment.)

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC
Video screenshot

The pharmaceutical giant Gilead Sciences, Inc. -- heck of a name for these times -- recently announced US sales of a generic version of its HIV prevention drug Truvada would begin a year earlier than originally planned. The stepped-up schedule for the generic was at least in part the result of pressure from activists, who have made a lot of noise about the fact that Gilead's huge revenues from Truvada -- about $3 billion annually -- came only after the basic research for the drug was done at taxpayer expense, largely through grants from the Centers for Disease Control, which holds the patent on the drug.

At a House Oversight Committee hearing last week, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez let one of the witnesses, Gilead CEO Daniel O'Day, know she wasn't personally blaming him or his greed for the high cost of the drug, which prevents the spread of HIV through "pre-exposure prophylaxis" (PrEP). No, that's all a result of the terrible incentives that come from the fact that the US, alone among developed countries, treats healthcare as a commodity, not a right for all. Which is why a monthly supply of Truvada costs nearly $1800 here, and roughly eight dollars in Australia.

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)


©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc