Nice Time Election News: Federal Judges Quite Insistent On Letting People Vote!

Show everyone you voted
After a whole bunch of stories about the revolting steps any number of states have taken to restrict voting this year, we're happy to say the federal judiciary is coming to the rescue at the last minute, as reliably as the last ten minutes of any given episode of Lassie. Let's take a quick look at how courts have thwarted Republican efforts to throw democracy down a well:
Turns out it's not OK to encourage Trump supporters to go to THOSE PLACES to watch THOSE PEOPLE vote!
UPDATE: Well, poop. The Supreme Court blocked the federal appeals court ruling this morning, putting the restrictions on ballot collection back in place, at least until the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considers the lawsuit in January. Full explainer at SCOTUSblog. Since there were no formal dissents from the ruling, there's no telling who voted how. SCOTUSblog notes that 26 other states have similar laws; the challengers to the law noted that even its supporters had not identified a single case of voter fraud associated with the practice of absentee ballot collection, and that it has been "one of the most popular and effective methods of minority voting in Arizona." So it goes.
And in North Carolina, federal Judge C. Loretta Biggs ordered three counties to immediately restore the registration of thousands of voters who had been taken off voting rolls after a coordinated Republican effort to purge black voters. Judge Biggs found the mass purges of voters violated the federal "Motor Voter law," which prohibits systemic removal of voters close to election day. The registrations had been purged after Republican activists sent letters to tens of thousands of registered voters, then petitioned county elections boards to purge anyone whose letter was returned as undeliverable, a process the judge said appeared antiquated and "insane" in an emergency hearing held Wednesday. The counties have said they will comply and let people vote, but the state is considering a challenge of the ruling after the election.Here's Rachel Maddow from Friday with more on the rulings; note that at the time of the broadcast, the Ohio ruling had not yet been handed down.
Did you hear THREE foreign people have voted in Kansas in the last 18 years? Obviously everybody else should be disenfranchised, then!
Now, with voting restrictions falling all over the place, people simply need to get their asses to the polls. And, of course, prepare for the inevitable Civil War that's coming when Hillary Clinton tries to take all the guns away.
Note: if you're paywalled out of the WSJ story, just google the title, "Federal Courts in Ohio, Arizona and N.C. Issue Voting Rulings Favoring Democrats" and you should be able to read it.
[WSJ / Arizona Republic / Chicago Tribune / MSNBC / Kansas City Star / NYT Update: SCOTUSblog]
Doktor Zoom's real name is Marty Kelley, and he lives in the wilds of Boise, Idaho. He is not a medical doctor, but does have a real PhD in Rhetoric. You should definitely donate some money to this little mommyblog where he has finally found acceptance and cat pictures. He is on maternity leave until 2033. Here is his Twitter, also. His quest to avoid prolixity is not going so great.