Donate

A few hours after the final body count of the latest school shooting was tallied, it came out: Nikolas Cruz, the shooter, had been known to "harass" women, known to abuse his ex-girlfriend, and was kicked out of school for getting into a fight with his ex-girlfriend.


Before long he was being cheered on by the sociopaths over on incels.me, 4chan's R9K board, and Reddit's new incel community r/braincels.

This is what happens now. I wrote this article when Elliot Rodger shot up Isla Vista, and I wrote it again when Christopher Harper-Mercer shot up Umpqua Community College. Twice. Each time it happens the same way: Some man with clear issues with women goes on a murder spree, and each time he is cheered as a hero on misogynistic forums.

We know now that Cruz was a Trump supporter who often wore a MAGA hat, that he was known to say horrible things about Muslims, that he attended paramilitary training with Republic of Florida, a white supremacist group hoping to create a "white ethnostate" in Florida. (UPDATE: While the white supremacist in charge of a Tallahassee group confirmed Cruz's participation to the AP and ADL, his statement is now being seriously questioned, and law enforcement has found no linkage between the two.) He was given a gun, though not the one he eventually used to murder 17 children at his old school, by someone in that group. Also, according to someone in that group, he was "having trouble with a girl" and that his choice to go on a killing spree on Valentine's Day was not a coincidence.

We know now that he publicly fantasized about killing Antifa:

We know now that he was a "fan" of Elliot Rodger.

Cruz was full of hate and resentment. Hate for non-white people, hate for "Antifa," hate for the people at his school, hate for women. Hate, likely, for anyone he saw as getting in the way of what he thought he was entitled to.

In my previous work on the subject of misogynistic mass shooters, I've focused largely on the fact that these men feel they are entitled to women -- ideally virginal supermodels -- and lash out at the world, violently, because they don't get them. In 2014, I wrote:

Elliot Rodger was the product of a culture that teaches male entitlement. Men are entitled to women, to sex, to jobs, to money -- and if they don’t get them, then women are to blame. He felt entitled to all these things and was livid over not getting them. You don’t see women committing crimes like this because we are not taught to feel entitled to these things.

I still believe this is true. I believe it applies, as well, to angry whites who feel that people of color are to blame for their not getting the things they believe they are entitled to.

But the thing is -- it has always been true -- and yet we didn't have quite so many mass murders. We need to ask ourselves what has changed?

That guns, particularly assault rifles, are more easily available now is certainly a contributing factor, but there are also cultural and social factors that we need to start addressing.

In the 1970s, if you thought Ted Bundy was a hero for murdering all those women, you kept that to yourself. You couldn't just casually say, "Wow, that guy had a POINT!" to someone or else people would think you were nuts. You couldn't go on a YouTube video and post about how great he was. Today, people who feel that way can find each other, they can commiserate without being judged. They can talk online about how much they would really like to murder a bunch of women. They get to cherish their resentments, nurture them and watch them grow.

Like a cult leader going from prophet to messiah to Literal Jesus, the insular nature of these groups creates a need for constant escalation. Someone may stop by one of these forums because they are having a bad day, because they feel slighted in some way, or because their crush wouldn't go out with them and they feel bad, and eventually get so sucked into these communities that instead of dealing with these common life events in a healthy way, they start one-upping each other to the point where they fantasize about murdering people. They start out being "I'm not a racist but..." types and end up dreaming about a white ethnostate and praising Hitler. They lose touch with reality.

Socialization is not innate, it is learned -- and the fact that more of it is being learned on the internet these days rather than in-person has consequences. It's easier to see other people as NPCs who don't feel the same way you do, it's easier to dismiss their humanity when most of your interaction with them is on social media, where most people are pretending to have a fabulous and perfect life. Even when they're not putting on that facade, even if they're angsty as hell, it's still just words on a page.

It's also just words on a page when you're just sitting around trolling people, or trying to purposely hurt people, when you spend hours in misogynistic and racist forums dehumanizing women and men you think are better looking than you are and have more dates, dehumanizing people of other races and religion. It creates a certain kind of solipsism, a feeling that only your own feelings are real, that other people's emotions and inner lives are no more real than those of people on television shows. That makes misogyny easier, it makes racism easier, it makes violence easier.

It doesn't help that, in some sections of the internet, there is a culture in which cruelty is currency. This is part of the reason why Trump won -- because people like Cruz delighted in his cruelty. He is cheered on these same toxic forums for his ability to "troll" people and "trigger the libs." Trump was the nail in the coffin of basic human decency actually meaning something. Trump won because too many people have become inured to cruelty.

We need to consider the fact that maybe some things need to be taught that didn't used to need to be taught. Instincts that were once perhaps tempered by things as simple as "hanging out" with other people are no longer being tempered. Those who are socially inept don't get the practice they need to overcome it, they don't learn how to relate to people, to read body language and facial expressions. Young men don't learn how to relate to or talk to women like actual human beings. They don't learn how to be masculine, or how to express their anger or emotions, in a healthy way.

This is part of what we talk about when we talk about "toxic masculinity." Contrary to what conservatives and anti-feminists think, this is not feminists saying "being a man is bad and toxic! BOO MEN!" No one is saying that. (Okay, very few people are saying that.) What we are saying is that a lot of the attributes we ascribe to masculinity are unhealthy and, quite frankly, just as bad for men as they are for women. Statistically, men are vastly less likely to seek therapy for mental issues than are women, largely because doing so is perceived as weak and unmanly. Men are expected to be violent, to be sexual conquistadors, to not have emotions other than anger. A woman rejecting them, breaking up with them, is not just a heartbreak, but a perceived threat to their masculinity, to their very identity.

Ease of access to guns, toxic masculinity, white resentment and a lack of in-person socialization are a deadly combination. In Italy, where femicide and domestic violence has become an extremely serious problem, some schools have started implementing what amounts, essentially, to "don't kill your girlfriend" classes -- in which young men are taught, through role-playing and texts, how to handle romantic conflict without resorting to violence. Perhaps something similar needs to be implemented in our own schools. Maybe we actually do need "classes" where young men can talk and role-play and learn healthy ways of responding to their own anger and resentment, healthy ways of interacting with people in real life.

It may sound like a too touchy-feely response to the horror of mass shootings, to the poison of misogyny and racism, but something has to be done. Quite frankly, we clearly need to teach them how to live in and adjust to a world where being a white man doesn't afford them the privilege it once did. If that's not a thing that can "work" then we need to figure out something else. Because whatever we're doing now, it's clearly not working.

[The Daily Beast]

Wonkette is 100 percent funded by readers like you! Click here to help?

Robyn Pennacchia

Robyn Pennacchia is a brilliant, fabulously talented and visually stunning angel of a human being, who shrugged off what she is pretty sure would have been a Tony Award-winning career in musical theater in order to write about stuff on the internet. Previously, she was a Senior Staff Writer at Death & Taxes, and Assistant Editor at The Frisky (RIP). Currently, she writes for Wonkette, Friendly Atheist, Quartz and other sites. Follow her on Twitter at @RobynElyse

$
Donate with CC
Wikimedia

Ever since Ruth Bader Ginsburg successfully underwent surgery for lung cancer, conservative sites and message boards have been trafficking in a ridiculous theory that she is actually dead and that there is some kind of Weekend at Bernie's-esque conspiracy to pretend she is still alive.

Now, one would think that her recent public appearance at a concert held in her honor would have put this to rest. Alas, it did not. Rather, the "researchers" (as they hilariously call themselves) determined that the concert was actually her funeral.

No. Really. That was a thing.

I admit that I gave this a lot more thought than I should have. Like, how did they think this would go? How long did they imagine this would go on for? Why would they risk having a full on funeral concert, open to the press? Wouldn't they just have not bothered to have a funeral at all? And what did these people think was going to happen when it was announced that she died for real? Or did they think that we were going to pretend that she is immortal and thus never announce her death? It's so confusing!

Being very up to date on the "RBG is secretly dead!" nonsense, I was very curious about which way the "anons" would go with this when they announced her return to work on Friday. They did not disappoint!

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Screenshot

Yesterday afternoon, 45-year-old Gary Martin of Aurora, Illinois was let go from his job at the Henry Pratt Company, a factory that manufactures water valves. In response, he took out a pistol with a laser scope and began shooting at random. He killed five people and injured six others who were just trying to make it through the day at the water valve factory, and then the police killed him.

His mother said he was "stressed out." He "seemed fine" according to the clerk at the Circle K where he bought his cigars that morning. His neighbor thought he was a nice guy. Some people were surprised, others were not.

This kind of thing used to be shocking, but it's a story we're used to now. It gets repeated at least once a month. It's just what happens now, and we can't do anything about it because we can't do anything about gun control. This is, the Right has decided, just the price we all have to pay so they can stockpile guns for funsies, and take sexy pictures of guns shoved in their pants. This is the blood that waters their special tree of liberty.

It's fucking exhausting. And stupid. We shouldn't have to live this way. No one should have to live this way. But we do. Why? Because some day some yahoos might want to overthrow the government, which is (of course) a completely legal thing to do, and their "right" to do that must be protected. So it's literally just never, ever going to stop.

Gary Martin, like most other mass shooters, also had a history of violence against women. In 1994, in Mississippi, he was convicted for stabbing one. He should not have been able to get a gun after that. I would like to know how and why he was able to get that pistol with the laser scope that he killed five people with yesterday afternoon. Maybe someone gave it to him. Maybe he bought it somehow. Maybe someone forgot to do a background check. Maybe he bought it from someone who didn't have to do a background check.

I am so goddamned tired of writing this article. I am out of things to say.

[Sun-Times]

Wonkette is independent and fully funded by readers like you. Click below to tip us!

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc