Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cat's Paw's avatar

reality is what you believe.but philosophers argue over it.

NPR Science Fridays Always presenting new possibilities.I am talking about Human governance.

How we govern ourselves.How our monkey brains cause us to fear a king.and cause a king to instill fear in his subjects.

Like monkeys. When you know the king will gouge your eye out,it seems pretty real.

Monkeys do that to each other, you know.They don't like someone, they bite hes face off.

Expand full comment
Rev. Slim's avatar

The abortion issue is not about morality or even religion. It is found nowhere in the Bible.

Until now, the abortion issue has simply been about money, period. In fact, the abortion issue never really existed until the 1970s, when the GOP realized it was a colossal campaign cash machine.

Furthermore, it was never about children either. The anti-abortion crowd doesn't give a damn about kids or even fetuses. (If they really cared about kids, they’d stop blocking Democrats on Climate Crisis legislation.) Being against abortion simply allows Republicans to feel morally superior and self-righteous.

What the abortion issue is really about today, however, is far more serious than even women's health or women's rights – as serious as those issues are.

The abortion issue is in fact the legal epicenter in the fight to save U.S. democracy.These far-right religious zealots are using the right-wing Roberts Supreme Court to hand down a decision on abortion that codifies into law their religious belief that 'a human soul is created at conception' – again, a religious belief that has absolutely no factual basis in medical science whatever.

What this all boils down to is that such a decision will give their religious beliefs legal precedence over medical science.

This will lead to a Constitutional catastrophe, since such a legal precedent will amount to an end-run around the Constitution. allowing these religious zealots to then use this legal precedent to give their religious beliefs legal authority over not just medical science – but over science in general.

Once such a legal precedent is set, it can then be argued as a legal basis to affect or alter other laws. Such an argument would no doubt be favorably viewed by the current right-wing Roberts Supreme Court.

What’s more, this outcome can be achieved thereafter in other cases by a simple SCOTUS edict, bypassing legislation, referendum, or the consent of – or even the knowledge of – the American Public.

The establishment of a legal precedent has been used many times to reach far beyond its original intent or purpose. And such power in the hands of these religious fanatics would not hesitate to be used.

If this sounds far-fetched, it isn’t. All the madness we see today was inconceivable only a few years ago. And the it-can't-happen-here mentality is making it all but inevitable.

As author and intelligence expert Malcolm Nance puts it, if these fanatics are not stopped, the THE HANDMAID'S TALE will be no longer just a novel – but a documentary.

Expand full comment
328 more comments...

No posts