Discussion about this post

User's avatar
LeighBowery'sLuxuryComedy's avatar

Let's not forget that the whole concept of 'childhood' as we know it is pretty much a Victorian invention. Perhaps because lifespans were much shorter, and/or death in childbirth so much more common. If your motivating factor is finding the best breeding stock available to partner with, sixteen (aka, reliably 'grass on the field') was entirely a reasonable marriageable age - after all, what else were they going to do with those aging heifers, educate them? (and now I'm speculating on how much marriage age may have contributed to the notion of women as 'childlike' - but never mind all that).

As with so many of the social issues facing us today, humanity is struggling to evolve. Right, and you thought we were done with that once we learned how to walk upright, didn't you? But so many of these concepts - children having time to develop into adults, women being free to decide the course of their own lives, marriage being a contract with the person you love regardless of plumbing - would have been perfectly alien to our great-grandparents. And yet we are finding that embracing them has not brought society crashing down around our ears - if anything, it's the reactions *against* evolving that makes our society so scary right now.

I could go on, but lunch break is over..

Expand full comment
sgt. jmk de la résistance's avatar

I don't know... did George wear ribbons in his curls?

Expand full comment
399 more comments...

No posts