Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wes's avatar

That’s not far off.

Expand full comment
capnkrunch's avatar

There's probably good arguments either way and I can't find any definitive sources, but the sources I do find seem to be in agreement that "I'm," as a standalone sentence is incorrect. Some of the reasons I've seen are:

-The sentence "I am," emphasizes a state of being. The sentence is only given meaning by the stress on the "am" and therefore you cannot contract it. Although this is a spoken English quirk, it still applies to written English because it is impossible to read meaning into the sentence without the separate verb.-The clitic 'm is specifically a form of the auxiliary "am." In the philosophical example sentence "I am," am is the main verb. It's not that it cannot be contracted but that the contraction actually has a different meaning from what you're trying to say.-In spoken English you are not allowed to strand weak forms of verbs. Generally this doesn't matter in written English because weak vs. strong is only a verbal distinction. However, clitics are a weak form that are written differently so the stranding rule extends to written clitics.Note that this case doesn't (I think) apply to "I am," as a philosophical sentence but does as a reply: "Who is going?" "I am." In the reply, you are eliding the verb "going" which requires a strong "am." This is why "I'm going," or "I am," work but "I'm," does not.

Some sources:https://english.stackexchan...https://english.stackexchan...https://ask.metafilter.com/...

Expand full comment
3469 more comments...

No posts