New York Governor Kathy Hochul has patiently explained to him that this is what their shield law is for and that she will, under no circumstances, be sending Carpenter to Louisiana.
//
Next step -- Landry takes a page from PAB's book and sends some guys in masks and a plain white van to snatch Carpenter off the street and spirit her down to stand for her kangaroo court.
Having masked doctors who aren't identified seems -- somehow less threatening than masked, unbadged "law enforcement officers" who don't identify themselves. But, What about Jeebus? I hear them cry.
"The thing is, it’s very likely that this will ultimately go to the super conservative Supreme Court, which has, in fact, lately found that Texas can do anything it wants."
SCOTUS doesn't give two fucks about the Constitution, why should anyone else?
I'm starting to think the ultimate goal of SCOTUS is to piss off blue states enough that they start just telling SCOTUS to fuck off. Because what they really want is to break the union.
"Paxton claims is “unconstitutional.” Unfortunately, he has yet to find the part of the Constitution that says that Texas can tell New York what to do."
Right?! Well done, Robyn. I also don't see anywhere in the constitution that says Texas can send troops to IlliFuckingnois!
You mean even conservative women won't date them because there isn't a chance in hell any liberal would touch them with a 10' pole except to knock them in the head then the twig and berries.
Please, legitimate medical organizations and blue state Attorneys General, please file a lawsuit against the organizations of Senator Joshua Hawley's wife Erin Hawley for spreading falsehoods about Mifepristone and Misoprostal:
"Hawley, who currently serves as senior counsel and vice president of the Center for Life and regulatory practice at the [Alliance Defending Freedom]ADF, is today at the forefront of the next major abortion case to reach the Supreme Court. The case, FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, seeks to further restrict access to abortion. Hawley, who serves as the head counsel in the case, argued on behalf of anti-abortion doctors at the Supreme Court on March 26 that the abortion pill, which was approved more than two decades ago, was not properly approved for pregnancy termination by the FDA and is, therefore, a danger to women. If the Court sides with Hawley’s team, it could potentially limit access to the abortion pill nationwide." --Yale News article regarding Erin Hawley, Yale Law School Class of 2005.
Trump : "One thing I say is we have to have quick trials. I called it quick trial. 'Cause in China they do have quick trials, you know? ... They should have a trial the following day."
Says the guy who voted by mail and is suspending vote by mail for everyone else? You don't say. "Rules for thee, not for me!"
And if I had a dollar for every time I've thought of typing or actually typed out The Rules this year I'd have a few extra hundred dollars, I think. There's almost nothing said or done on the right that it doesn't explain.
They're just catching on to what we've known for years now - what I saw as far back as 2008 and have felt brewing since 2012, and I don't consider myself entirely well-read at all, but I did take note of all the signs, and never forgot them as things got worse and worse. We've been a democracy at least 17 years longer than the RWNJs wanted us to, for them it was all over with just one glance over at Obama. They've been all AH, HELL NO ever since.
"The thing is, it’s very likely that this will ultimately go to the super conservative Supreme Court, which has, in fact, lately found that Texas can do anything it wants." With one major exception: Article IV (state powers) of the Constitution specifically forbids states from doing one thing, namely, challenging the official actions of another state. The Supreme Court has "original jurisdiction" (not by appeal from lower courts) over suits between states, which usually involve questions about surveying the borders or interpreting "compacts" about water rights etc. When a state tries to sue about the official actions of another state, the Court does not accept the filing. In Nebraska v. Colorado, where Nebraska did not like Colorado legalizing marijuana, Alito and Thomas dissented from the order that the suit not be placed on the docket at all, saying that the Court should have taken the case and ruled against Nebraska on the merits. They took the same position, without getting any other Justices to agree with them, when the Court round-filed Texas v. Pennsylvania, when Texas tried to question Pennsylvania's handling of the 2020 vote (their filing was also full of laughable factual errors about what had actually happened, but the Court did not go there, just refusing to accept the filing as a suit by a state against official actions of another state).
But it’s also about the Justices’ ability to decide what cases they want to get into. The “original jurisdiction” is a problem for them because if any state can file their case against what other states are doing, they could be swamped with cases they didn’t want to be involved with at all.
Abortion is different though because it's an opportunity to oppress women by eliminating their bodily autonomy. As determined by medieval scholars in England.
At which point, if it has not already happened (should have ten years ago), CA and all other blue states start massive civil disobedience and stop paying taxes.
//
New York Governor Kathy Hochul has patiently explained to him that this is what their shield law is for and that she will, under no circumstances, be sending Carpenter to Louisiana.
//
Next step -- Landry takes a page from PAB's book and sends some guys in masks and a plain white van to snatch Carpenter off the street and spirit her down to stand for her kangaroo court.
Women of Texas - get the hell out of Gilead…before the republicans there kill you.
Having masked doctors who aren't identified seems -- somehow less threatening than masked, unbadged "law enforcement officers" who don't identify themselves. But, What about Jeebus? I hear them cry.
Jebus can see through their masks. Just like he can hear your silent prayers, much to Nancy Mace's dismay.
Jack Vance demon prince III?
"The thing is, it’s very likely that this will ultimately go to the super conservative Supreme Court, which has, in fact, lately found that Texas can do anything it wants."
SCOTUS doesn't give two fucks about the Constitution, why should anyone else?
After all, Harlan Crow lives in TX.
Anything Texas wants and anything TFG wants.
Corrupted, bought off, religious zealots who will go down as THE worst Supreme Court in history.
I'm starting to think the ultimate goal of SCOTUS is to piss off blue states enough that they start just telling SCOTUS to fuck off. Because what they really want is to break the union.
They've already done that by favoring Texas (and every other red state, obvsly).
The days of a non-political court are over, and they won't be coming back unless there's a reform with enforceable teeth.
"Paxton claims is “unconstitutional.” Unfortunately, he has yet to find the part of the Constitution that says that Texas can tell New York what to do."
Right?! Well done, Robyn. I also don't see anywhere in the constitution that says Texas can send troops to IlliFuckingnois!
The blue states will be our only hope. Ds as a whole are not doing enough which makes them part of the problem and little on the solution side.
And conservative men are complaining that women don't want to date them. This is one reason why.
You mean even conservative women won't date them because there isn't a chance in hell any liberal would touch them with a 10' pole except to knock them in the head then the twig and berries.
Oh no, conservative women will date them ... but have you met conservative women?
Yeah and we don't mesh well so I leave them to themselves. They deserve each other.
Please, legitimate medical organizations and blue state Attorneys General, please file a lawsuit against the organizations of Senator Joshua Hawley's wife Erin Hawley for spreading falsehoods about Mifepristone and Misoprostal:
"Hawley, who currently serves as senior counsel and vice president of the Center for Life and regulatory practice at the [Alliance Defending Freedom]ADF, is today at the forefront of the next major abortion case to reach the Supreme Court. The case, FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, seeks to further restrict access to abortion. Hawley, who serves as the head counsel in the case, argued on behalf of anti-abortion doctors at the Supreme Court on March 26 that the abortion pill, which was approved more than two decades ago, was not properly approved for pregnancy termination by the FDA and is, therefore, a danger to women. If the Court sides with Hawley’s team, it could potentially limit access to the abortion pill nationwide." --Yale News article regarding Erin Hawley, Yale Law School Class of 2005.
I find this delicious and delightful. Go CA.
The shooter turned himself in to his father. Where do Bongo and Kash go to get their apology from the libs mocking their incompetence?
By Hugh Hewit
FoxNews?
You mean Fux.
I call it Fixed News but yeah.
California bans Texas pit smoked meats, imposes criminal and civil penalties for sale and distribution thereof
and texas oil...and natural gas..
Trump : "One thing I say is we have to have quick trials. I called it quick trial. 'Cause in China they do have quick trials, you know? ... They should have a trial the following day."
Irony is dead.
Says the guy who delays trials for himself at every turn.
Says the guy who voted by mail and is suspending vote by mail for everyone else? You don't say. "Rules for thee, not for me!"
And if I had a dollar for every time I've thought of typing or actually typed out The Rules this year I'd have a few extra hundred dollars, I think. There's almost nothing said or done on the right that it doesn't explain.
Hate to say, Thomas Jefferson believed the same in the days before technology.
I guess it depends on "quick" because I don't think we should be sentencing people in a month, but it's batshit it takes YEARS to even get to court
Oh, I understand THAT!
Sure, send it to SCROTUS, and let them 'splain why Article 10 doesn't apply.
LOOO-SEEEE! You got some 'splainin' to do!
"Defendant weighs less than a duck. We find in favor of Texas."
According to FEC records, Tyle Robinson donated to Trump in 2020.
https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?data_type=processed&contributor_name=Tyler+Robinson&contributor_city=St+george&two_year_transaction_period=2020&two_year_transaction_period=2022&two_year_transaction_period=2024&two_year_transaction_period=2026&min_date=01%2F01%2F2019&max_date=12%2F31%2F2026
Less than $250. That's not going to get him much juice with Chump.
'THE FEC IS PART OF THE TRANS ANTIFA WOKE MOB PLOT!"
Sounds like he accidentally got infected with Woke.
Huh, ya think? At least we have an anchor of calm reason sitting in the Oval Office. Oh wait, y’all voted for fucking chaos and hate
After Kirk Killing, Americans Agree on One Thing: Something Is Seriously Wrong
In interviews from across the country, people expressed fear and wariness, and said that the country seemed to be spinning out of control.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/12/us/politics/charlie-kirk-voters-politics-violence.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
"Spinning out of control" -- Is that the same as saying the government is NOT in good hands?
They're just catching on to what we've known for years now - what I saw as far back as 2008 and have felt brewing since 2012, and I don't consider myself entirely well-read at all, but I did take note of all the signs, and never forgot them as things got worse and worse. We've been a democracy at least 17 years longer than the RWNJs wanted us to, for them it was all over with just one glance over at Obama. They've been all AH, HELL NO ever since.
Sure, but the right-wingers think the problem is that people like us are allowed to walk around free.
They’re not wrong. While the extreme right wants everyone kung fu fighting the rest of the populace Isn’t so keen on the idea. Oh one would hope.
Gosh, I wonder how that happened?
Until a few days ago, they were convinced that all the guns were pointed in one direction, and it wasn't at them.
Don't get me fucking started on that.
I've felt like that since W at least, with a few periods of calm.
I actually think that the 9/11 attacks succeeded in breaking America
Covid may have finished the job
Jan 6 marches in, flying flags and carrying sticks
And Shrub shrugged off warnings, knowing that they could use it as cover for the Imperial March of Petro
Yup.
"The thing is, it’s very likely that this will ultimately go to the super conservative Supreme Court, which has, in fact, lately found that Texas can do anything it wants." With one major exception: Article IV (state powers) of the Constitution specifically forbids states from doing one thing, namely, challenging the official actions of another state. The Supreme Court has "original jurisdiction" (not by appeal from lower courts) over suits between states, which usually involve questions about surveying the borders or interpreting "compacts" about water rights etc. When a state tries to sue about the official actions of another state, the Court does not accept the filing. In Nebraska v. Colorado, where Nebraska did not like Colorado legalizing marijuana, Alito and Thomas dissented from the order that the suit not be placed on the docket at all, saying that the Court should have taken the case and ruled against Nebraska on the merits. They took the same position, without getting any other Justices to agree with them, when the Court round-filed Texas v. Pennsylvania, when Texas tried to question Pennsylvania's handling of the 2020 vote (their filing was also full of laughable factual errors about what had actually happened, but the Court did not go there, just refusing to accept the filing as a suit by a state against official actions of another state).
But, this is about 'bortion. That's different.
A) No.
B) this Nazi theofascist SCROTUS is heading for mass civil disobedience of its fascist decrees at record speed.
But it’s also about the Justices’ ability to decide what cases they want to get into. The “original jurisdiction” is a problem for them because if any state can file their case against what other states are doing, they could be swamped with cases they didn’t want to be involved with at all.
AND WOULD BE, thank fuckin dog.
Abortion is different though because it's an opportunity to oppress women by eliminating their bodily autonomy. As determined by medieval scholars in England.
SCOTUS will rule that California is not a state.
At which point, if it has not already happened (should have ten years ago), CA and all other blue states start massive civil disobedience and stop paying taxes.
Bring it!
(I'd love to see all those red states get along without us!)
Ummm... Residents of territories and protectorates still have to pay federal taxes and they don't get to have any representation in congress.
The only way to make it work would be for California to sign a mutual defense pact with China and then declare independence.
No taxes.
I want total independence.
It was the first thing I researched when Trump became president.
(Too bad those organizations are run by crazies!)
So tired of seeing CA vilified by red states that are dependent on us.