One of us! One of us! We never thought we'd see the day, but the Atlantic , fresh off a story kind of blaming workers for killing a company already in bankruptcy , has published a piece decrying the unfair distribution of American riches and arguing that Job Creators should maybe cough up some tip money so Olds can see the doctor here and there.
We don't tax "wealth" anymore, now that the estate tax is out of fashion. What the rich object to is that with higher income taxes, they'd be getting even richer more slowly.
And yet Kennedy, as US ambassador to GB, was angry at the RAF for winning the Battle of Britain, thereby postponing Hitler's inevitable conquest of England.
They&#039;re still doing <a href="http:\/\/jmaced.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/stocks_12397_lg.gif" target="_blank">this</a>? Well, maybe in Alabama, and as long as it&#039;s just an option...
There&#039;s an unintentionally hilarious <a href="http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2012\/11\/23\/business\/a-starting-point-for-tax-reform-what-reagan-did.html\?ref=business" target="_blank">article</a> on tax reform in today&#039;s <i>NYT,</i> in which someone named Floyd Norris asserts that &quot;(t)he proper way to approach that proposal is to accept that the government needs to raise a certain amount of money,&quot; at which point you can stop reading, because Republicans do not and will not accept that idea.
Extremely wealthy people will pay the lawyers and the pacs to avoid taxes, but they don&#039;t want to pay taxes? You don&#039;t say. I had thought that the argument that the wealthy deliberately keep the poors uneducated and uninformed might be a little over the top, but I believe this election has convinced me.
To be fair, Romney/Ryan didn&#039;t directly say they were going to increase the Medicare eligibility age to 70. It&#039;s just a logical consequence of what they said. But Romney/Ryan don&#039;t believe in logical consequences, so it doesn&#039;t count.
That sounds like a a modest proposal.
We don&#039;t tax &quot;wealth&quot; anymore, now that the estate tax is out of fashion. What the rich object to is that with higher income taxes, they&#039;d be getting even richer more slowly.
Angry young men are being taken out of the system, all right ... but that might not be what you&#039;re referring to.
There&#039;s a difference?
That&#039;s so well done, you could post it on any wingnut board, and earn enough upfists to reach low earth orbit.
Wookies is my hero too.
And yet Kennedy, as US ambassador to GB, was angry at the RAF for winning the Battle of Britain, thereby postponing Hitler&#039;s inevitable conquest of England.
They&#039;re still doing <a href="http:\/\/jmaced.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/stocks_12397_lg.gif" target="_blank">this</a>? Well, maybe in Alabama, and as long as it&#039;s just an option...
There&#039;s an unintentionally hilarious <a href="http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2012\/11\/23\/business\/a-starting-point-for-tax-reform-what-reagan-did.html\?ref=business" target="_blank">article</a> on tax reform in today&#039;s <i>NYT,</i> in which someone named Floyd Norris asserts that &quot;(t)he proper way to approach that proposal is to accept that the government needs to raise a certain amount of money,&quot; at which point you can stop reading, because Republicans do not and will not accept that idea.
All the ads used the same script. I couldn&#039;t tell who was running for what position.
That it&#039;s socialist?
and that the brother is a doctor.
Extremely wealthy people will pay the lawyers and the pacs to avoid taxes, but they don&#039;t want to pay taxes? You don&#039;t say. I had thought that the argument that the wealthy deliberately keep the poors uneducated and uninformed might be a little over the top, but I believe this election has convinced me.
To be fair, Romney/Ryan didn&#039;t directly say they were going to increase the Medicare eligibility age to 70. It&#039;s just a logical consequence of what they said. But Romney/Ryan don&#039;t believe in logical consequences, so it doesn&#039;t count.
When confronted with &quot;facts&quot; Fox viewers are known to shoot at their teevees.