Sorry, nerds, despite the title, this week's episode of Cosmos, "Deeper, Deeper, Deeper Still," is not Neil deGrasse Tyson porn. Or maybe the whole series is. We won't question what goes on between you and your television. That title summarizes what feels like half of Tyson's lines this week: It's all atoms and subatomic particles, so we keep looking at things on an ever-tinier scale.
Law? Screw that, it&#039;s just a <a href="http:\/\/thehappyscientist.com\/science-experiment\/gravity-theory-or-law" target="_blank">theory</a>! Like evolution! Why doesn&#039;t de Grasse Tyson teach the controversy?
#1 Thanks to Rebecca for resolving my commenting problem. #2 &quot;Science as entertainment&quot; isn&#039;t so common on commercial tv and Neil deGrasse Tyson is probably one of the best at handling it. #3 So maybe something on the Axiom of Choice?
My daughter collects those things. (Yeah, another SciChick.) One of her pals at school thought it was hysterical to &quot;give her <a href="http:\/\/www.giantmicrobes.com\/us\/products\/herpes.html" target="_blank">herpes </a>&quot;.
&quot;Masses attract with a force inversely proportional to the square of the distance&quot;, vs. &quot;God is holding everything down.&quot; Both theories can explain everything.
My hope is they are just testing the waters; if the show gets high ratings they&#039;ll kick it up a notch next season. My fear is that they think this is how smrt Amercians are now, and they are probably (R)-right.
<i>Carbon is &ldquo;the molecular slut of the table of elements</i> .
Well, good morning, you sexy, sexy carbon-based lifeform, you. ;)
Other websites have recaps of &quot;Mad Men&quot; and &quot;Game of Thrones.&quot; What is this place&mdash;Nerdistan?
Ha! Me too. F = gm&sup1;m&sup2;/r&sup2;
It reminds me of a letter opener with a bulge at one end.
Law? Screw that, it&#039;s just a <a href="http:\/\/thehappyscientist.com\/science-experiment\/gravity-theory-or-law" target="_blank">theory</a>! Like evolution! Why doesn&#039;t de Grasse Tyson teach the controversy?
#1 Thanks to Rebecca for resolving my commenting problem. #2 &quot;Science as entertainment&quot; isn&#039;t so common on commercial tv and Neil deGrasse Tyson is probably one of the best at handling it. #3 So maybe something on the Axiom of Choice?
No electron falls into a lower orbit without Jeebus knowing about it.
-Prof. Matthew
My daughter collects those things. (Yeah, another SciChick.) One of her pals at school thought it was hysterical to &quot;give her <a href="http:\/\/www.giantmicrobes.com\/us\/products\/herpes.html" target="_blank">herpes </a>&quot;.
Neutrinos are atheist ... no mass, ever.
Over-compensating, perhaps, for the fact that it&#039;s on Fox.
win
&quot;Masses attract with a force inversely proportional to the square of the distance&quot;, vs. &quot;God is holding everything down.&quot; Both theories can explain everything.
My hope is they are just testing the waters; if the show gets high ratings they&#039;ll kick it up a notch next season. My fear is that they think this is how smrt Amercians are now, and they are probably (R)-right.