I do see a place for AI in law. If you have ever stepped inside of a law library, you can appreciate the vast quantity of material through which one might search for relevant cases, briefs and other supporting documents. That being said, the time required to do this research has been minimized with internet access to much of the same data. Like other research aids, the onus is on the human to ensure the veracity of the material used to make a case.
Speaking of shitty men who feel wronged by women who don’t like them, I saw the horror movie “Obsession,” yesterday. It’s a parable about the current era of men who feel they deserve a woman, even if it’s by law or something other than free will. In “Obsession,” awkward but seemingly harmless nice guy Bear is pining for his coworker childhood buddy, Nikki. She’s beautiful, she’s smart, and she gives money to homeless people. She a catch. But she only likes Bear as a friend. She tells Bear that. She tells their 2 mutual friends that. Bear knows it. But he finds a creepy little gimmicky mystical toy called a “One Wish Willow,” a piece of Willow branch twisted like a pretzel. The box is cheerful and features kids faces. You make a wish, break the willow, and see what happens!
Bear decides to break the willow and wish that Nikki “would love me more than anything in the world.” Immediately she’s different. She invites him in. She seems confused. He’s weirded out. Something is obviously wrong. But she wants to be with Bear, and that’s enough. The movie is fairly well made, and actually treats the idea of stealing a person’s free will with some of the respect it deserves. The real Nikki is trapped, somewhere bad, and occasionally breaks through the spellbound version of herself and she’s in turmoil. She screams when they first kiss, but then apologizes and they continue. The movie goes way off the rails, like most modern horror movies, and the brainwashed Nikki turns into an insane sociopath who will kill and self-harm to keep Bear. But it’s the moments where the film respects what the loss of free will costs people that have value. At one key moment, the real Nikki is able to speak to Bear while her trapped body is sleeping. She begs Bear to kill her. He replies, narcissistically, “is it so bad being with me?” Her answer is telling. “I was never with you.”
Bear has robbed Nikki of her free will, and when he calls the help line on the One Wish Willow box, the creepy guy on the line (voiced by the director) says “there’s nothing you can do. You have a moral obligation to be there for her. You made the wish.” There is a way out, Bear can kill himself and the spell will end and she will be free. He ignores the inevitable ending too long, and we see basically everyone around them die due to Bear’s choice.
It’s supposed to be a horror movie by a young director. It’s getting good reviews. But for me, the gore and violence were just gross and needless, and missed an opportunity to actually address how vital free will truly is. Bear does get it, sorta, near the end. He realizes Nikki doesn’t actually love or even like Bear, at least, not the Nikki whose love was worth earning. He figures it out too late, but the actress who plays Nikki is getting rave reviews, so that’s good I suppose.
The scariest part, for me, was during the call to the customer service guy. (You can actually call the number on the box from the movie and the director has a message, like a disclaimer, saying he can’t help any bad wish consequences). After telling Bear his wish is for life, he asks if Bear would like to speak to the real Nikki. Bear says yes. Then it’s just Nikki screaming, in some sort of purgatory. She’s had her body appropriated for Bear’s use, regardless of how bizarre or dangerous her behavior. Her free will is trapped in a dark place. The scary part is how many people in toxic relationships will recognize where Nikki is.
He will cut out the lawyer and have an AI argue his case directly. I figure he will get at least 20 years after confessing to shooting the sheriff, but not the deputy.
Love the pic of Mr. god-i'm-an-unfuckable-pencil-dick-brown-comet-stain-piece-of-shit, who probably ordered a double scoop of 'Ebola-Skunk-Belly-Ripple' at that ice-cream store.
These lawyers confused AI with LexusNexus, I think. LexusNexus costs a lot of money to use. ($300-400 per person in the law firm per month.) AI is so much cheaper! (For now.) You know why? Because everything in Lexus Nexus has been manually verified at some point to be real and true.
Yikes
Hilarious to read, probably not so much based on proximity to the Adjucated Asshole
Nikko D’Ambrosie sues for dates. Typical Beta.
I do see a place for AI in law. If you have ever stepped inside of a law library, you can appreciate the vast quantity of material through which one might search for relevant cases, briefs and other supporting documents. That being said, the time required to do this research has been minimized with internet access to much of the same data. Like other research aids, the onus is on the human to ensure the veracity of the material used to make a case.
Track this fool. Folks like him, don’t know how to “ move on” with their lives.
“Plaintiff failed to offer even colorable grounds for reversing the claims against those defendants.”
I need a legal beagle to interpret this. Is the judge saying “homie couldn’t even come up with a bullshit excuse?”
Straight up Law & Orderc SVU perp.
Efficiency on steroids means that they don't hire paralegals.
Speaking of shitty men who feel wronged by women who don’t like them, I saw the horror movie “Obsession,” yesterday. It’s a parable about the current era of men who feel they deserve a woman, even if it’s by law or something other than free will. In “Obsession,” awkward but seemingly harmless nice guy Bear is pining for his coworker childhood buddy, Nikki. She’s beautiful, she’s smart, and she gives money to homeless people. She a catch. But she only likes Bear as a friend. She tells Bear that. She tells their 2 mutual friends that. Bear knows it. But he finds a creepy little gimmicky mystical toy called a “One Wish Willow,” a piece of Willow branch twisted like a pretzel. The box is cheerful and features kids faces. You make a wish, break the willow, and see what happens!
Bear decides to break the willow and wish that Nikki “would love me more than anything in the world.” Immediately she’s different. She invites him in. She seems confused. He’s weirded out. Something is obviously wrong. But she wants to be with Bear, and that’s enough. The movie is fairly well made, and actually treats the idea of stealing a person’s free will with some of the respect it deserves. The real Nikki is trapped, somewhere bad, and occasionally breaks through the spellbound version of herself and she’s in turmoil. She screams when they first kiss, but then apologizes and they continue. The movie goes way off the rails, like most modern horror movies, and the brainwashed Nikki turns into an insane sociopath who will kill and self-harm to keep Bear. But it’s the moments where the film respects what the loss of free will costs people that have value. At one key moment, the real Nikki is able to speak to Bear while her trapped body is sleeping. She begs Bear to kill her. He replies, narcissistically, “is it so bad being with me?” Her answer is telling. “I was never with you.”
Bear has robbed Nikki of her free will, and when he calls the help line on the One Wish Willow box, the creepy guy on the line (voiced by the director) says “there’s nothing you can do. You have a moral obligation to be there for her. You made the wish.” There is a way out, Bear can kill himself and the spell will end and she will be free. He ignores the inevitable ending too long, and we see basically everyone around them die due to Bear’s choice.
It’s supposed to be a horror movie by a young director. It’s getting good reviews. But for me, the gore and violence were just gross and needless, and missed an opportunity to actually address how vital free will truly is. Bear does get it, sorta, near the end. He realizes Nikki doesn’t actually love or even like Bear, at least, not the Nikki whose love was worth earning. He figures it out too late, but the actress who plays Nikki is getting rave reviews, so that’s good I suppose.
The scariest part, for me, was during the call to the customer service guy. (You can actually call the number on the box from the movie and the director has a message, like a disclaimer, saying he can’t help any bad wish consequences). After telling Bear his wish is for life, he asks if Bear would like to speak to the real Nikki. Bear says yes. Then it’s just Nikki screaming, in some sort of purgatory. She’s had her body appropriated for Bear’s use, regardless of how bizarre or dangerous her behavior. Her free will is trapped in a dark place. The scary part is how many people in toxic relationships will recognize where Nikki is.
Hahahahaaaaa! Enjoyed this read.
Ta, Robyn. D'Ambrosio's name is entirely inapt. Ladies, you've been warned!
D’Ambrosio might be a creep who deserved to have this case dismissed, but it looks like he might have a solid case for attorney malpractice.
Terminal Incel Syndrome meets techbro toy. We get the laughs, he gets the finger.
Well, I assume his next lawsuit will be against marktrentAI. Wonder what software he’ll use for that?
He will cut out the lawyer and have an AI argue his case directly. I figure he will get at least 20 years after confessing to shooting the sheriff, but not the deputy.
There's a use case for AI judges: decisions rendered in 60 seconds. (With zero concern for consequent right-wing assholery.)
Efficiency on steroids, indeed!
Love the pic of Mr. god-i'm-an-unfuckable-pencil-dick-brown-comet-stain-piece-of-shit, who probably ordered a double scoop of 'Ebola-Skunk-Belly-Ripple' at that ice-cream store.
😂😂😂
These lawyers confused AI with LexusNexus, I think. LexusNexus costs a lot of money to use. ($300-400 per person in the law firm per month.) AI is so much cheaper! (For now.) You know why? Because everything in Lexus Nexus has been manually verified at some point to be real and true.
TBF, when your arguments find support only in random social media shitposts, LexisNexis is pretty useless.
(The Lexus Nexus, I think, is a consortium of Toyota dealers.)
Be a great name for an aftermarket parts supplier too
Oh, I never even realized I misspelled it. IANAL as the saying goes.