676 Comments
User's avatar
beb's avatar

Reagan cut taxes, Bush I cut taxes, Bush II cut taxes, Trump I cut taxes and Trump II cut taxes. Clinton raised taxes and all the pundits said it would destroy the economy. Oddly enough, it didn't. It even balanced the budget for the first time in decades. Cutting taxes was supposed to stimulate the economy but there's no evidence that it did. But Clinton's tax hikes boosted the economy, Obama's tax hikes boosted the economy and so did Biden. History makes it clear, never vote Republican.

Hooker P Tape's Epstein files's avatar

Scott Bissent is a moron. A classic non-DEI hire.

Baconzgood's avatar

OT.

Baconzgood has newz.

I just got hired for a jerb.

The hours are a bit odd but the pay ain't bad. I start on Tuesday. That is if I pass my drug and background test.

Although my urine looked a strange color of deep orange ive never seen and I have been downing a shit load of OTC drugs the last 72 hours because I had a super bad stomach flu.

Today is the first time I ate since Monday.

goCatgo's avatar

Good luck and best to you!

Debra Dassow's avatar

Here is a fact or two: it is true that Democrats tax and spend, and Republicans spend and tax your children and grandchildren.

Baconzgood's avatar

Baconz just learned Lake Erie is full of water too also.

Zyxomma's avatar

Ta, Dok. I smell Putin.

Rick Werder's avatar

You can rest assured that when a Democrat takes the White House, all the Republicans in Congress will be screaming about the need to deal with the debt and using feigned concern about it to oppose any policies that might actually benefit ordinary Americans.

DlbDC's avatar

How is it that most of us understand the bond markets work better than that Secretary of Smarmy Bullshit Let’s Get Into A Bar Fight With Other Smarmy White Republican Guys Piece of Shit Treasury?

Christopher Bosch's avatar

At least while he's posing for the fucking cameras he isn't sabotaging air traffic control or highway safety standards. We should encourage all of Piggy's cabinet worms to spend less time at the office, since they cause less harm taking selfies and shit.

Peter Dellos's avatar

DUMP talked a big game about how he was going to eliminate the debt before both of his terms, but just like getting Mexico to pay for the wall, it was all bullshit.

Major Is My Spirit Animal's avatar

Like every other promise or statement from his mouthanus.

Dorothea is a Democrat's avatar

Paul Krugman thinks Bessent is an incompetent idiot.

VwllssWndr's avatar

You could sub in the name of anyone else from this regime and it would be just as true.

YaJagoff's avatar

*checks note*, Paul is correct

What A Debacle's avatar

Simple idea for a devastating political ad.

Five things that Donald Trump and MAGA believe are more important than jobs, affordability, your health, social security and middle class tax relief and shows a checklist with a school teacher checking boxes.

[ x ] $1 billion dollar gold plated party palace with drones on the roof

[ x ] 10 battleships with laser beams

[ x ] a 4th of July UFC fight

[ x ] Starting a new endless war in the middle east

[ x ] Crypto scams

NH is for 🦡🍄🐍's avatar

“The United States does not have a high-spending problem; it has a low-tax problem.”

Couldn’t have said it better myself. YOU WANT SHIT, YOU PAY FOR SHIT. It ain’t fucking rocket science.

Hops: grrr mad's avatar

A low tax problem, definitely.

But it also has a high military spending problem. Eisenhower warned us, oh so long ago.

NH is for 🦡🍄🐍's avatar

TBF, military spending at approx. $1T per year is 1/7 of overall spending. Here’s a very general breakdown (2025 numbers). Bottom line: without raising revenue, even completely eliminating military spending wouldn’t put us into the black.

SPENDING

Non-discretionary (Social Security, Medicare, etc.): $4,000B

Non-military discretionary: $1,000B

Military: $1,000B

Interest: $1,000B

REVENUE: $5,200B

Parakeetist's avatar

If someone earns or holds *substantially* more than everybody else, they have to pay more.

It's like going into a restaurant, racking up a huge bill, and then walking out, saying "Someone else will pay it for me."

VwllssWndr's avatar

I'm getting the sense that this is precisely how the rich do things, though.

NH is for 🦡🍄🐍's avatar

Or like earning (or inheriting) a fuckton of money due to living in a generally prosperous, safe, stable, educated country, and saying “Fuck you fuckers; I got mine.”

swmnguy's avatar

There's no fixing the US government's fiscal situation without slashing war spending to what we actually need to defend the US; about a 90% cut.

And taxing corporations and the wealthy at Eisenhower Administration levels.

Every other suggestion is bullshit meant to mislead Americans that there is a magical solution.

The "social spending" actually has a positive R.O.I.

VwllssWndr's avatar

So what I'm hearing is more tax cuts for corporations and the rich so the money will trickle down. Sounds great, let's do it!

Notorious J.I.M.'s avatar

That's the part to focus on. Put those numbers out showing the positive ROI. Not that math makes sense anymore.

josephebacon's avatar

We can no longer sustain a bloated beyond belief military that puts billions of dollars in CEO pockets and lobster, caviar, Caesar salad, Potatoes Lyonnaise and chateaubriand on Drunk Ass Pete's lunch and dinner table while soldiers and sailors are put on a starvation diet and loaded up with testosterone shots!

Hooker P Tape's Epstein files's avatar

Same with health care/insurance.

SunMoonStars's avatar

"President Trump has demanded a liberal think tank retract a critical report on his National Guard deployments by Friday evening, threatening to file a $5 billion defamation suit if it doesn’t.

In a nine-page letter sent Monday by Trump’s personal attorney, which was reviewed by The Hill, he claimed the Center for American Progress (CAP) “manufactured” that the deployments weren’t improving violent crime.

“Defendants did not merely draw a different academic conclusion; they defamed President Trump by distorting a contested empirical question into a sensational, false, malicious and defamatory accusation that President Trump knowingly lied to the American people,” attorney Alejandro Brito wrote."

In a statement, CAP President and CEO Neera Tanden, a senior adviser to former President Biden, called the threat “baseless” and defended the report as “rigorous, evidence-based research and analysis.”

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/6043735-trump-center-american-progress-national-guard-defamation/

Major Is My Spirit Animal's avatar

Proper response - FUCK OFF and counter sue.

Hops: grrr mad's avatar

Future historians won't believe the sheer amount of criming and unhinged bullshit that we had to put up with during this administration.

VwllssWndr's avatar

Yeah, because by then someone worse will have come along and all of this will seem quaint by comparison.

Hops: grrr mad's avatar

There's a happy thought.

Cincinnatus's avatar

There will be at least a whole chapter's worth left out of high school civics books.

Resource NW's avatar

There is no dum(B)ster fire big enough to obliterate it all, though that will be attempted.

abbienormal's avatar

Good luck with the ACTUAL MALICE requirement, asshole.

SunMoonStars's avatar

Don't forget about the discovery process.

swmnguy's avatar

They don't care. They just want to run up the costs to the point CAP folds and cuts a check to save even more costs.

SunMoonStars's avatar

Yeah I keep forgetting that part. JFC I want him blasted off the planet.

Hops: grrr mad's avatar

His time will come, just not nearly soon enough.

SunMoonStars's avatar

It better because we will never recover without it.

Tasner Hasenpfeffer's avatar

Right. Suing anyone who calls him a fraud. Trump is really getting back to his roots.

Hops: grrr mad's avatar

Fraud.

Liar.

Con-artist.

Adjudicated rapist.

Grifter.

Business failure.

Crashing bore.

Toxic narcissist.

Adulterer.

I could go on...

Mr Beeep's avatar

Why not reduce the debt with AI Gamble Centers (patent pending)

Not losing money fast enough on DraftKings? Get AI to place random bets on trans athletes based on Natalie Harp’s menstrual cycles divided by Trump ball fungus. It’s pseudo scientifically proven by no one!

VasyaCognito's avatar

OT: SCOTUS allows construction to continue on Ballroom while they think about it some more.

NYTimes:

The Supreme Court on Friday temporarily allowed President Trump to continue construction of a luxury White House ballroom to replace the East Wing he demolished last fall.

In a one-sentence order, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., acting on his own, issued a placeholder that gives all nine justices additional time to more fully consider whether construction of the planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom can proceed.

The chief justice’s order did not provide a timeline for when the court would act next, stating only that a lower-court ruling against the Trump administration was paused “pending further order of the undersigned or of the court.”

Lower court judges had ruled that Mr. Trump exceeded his authority by moving ahead with the construction without approval from Congress. Even so, they had allowed the project to continue in recent months while litigation was underway.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/08/21/us/trump-news#supreme-court-trump-ballroom

VwllssWndr's avatar

Yeah, we saw this coming, right?

Resource NW's avatar

Reach around again by the quisling for the convicted felon.

abbienormal's avatar

Roberts is such a coward.

Zyxomma's avatar

No balls and I'd *love* to strike him.