Oh ladies. If the GOP isn't insulting your intellectual capacity, demanding you be submissive, or trying to keep your libido in check (because you are all raging fuckmonsters), then they are desperately wooing you for your votes. Their latest attempt to distract from their 1930-era policies is to scrounge around and find a GEN-YOU-INE lady to deliver the Republican response to the State of the Union. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) will
While I sort of hate to link to Po&#039;o, <a href="http:\/\/www.politico.com\/blogs\/media\/\?ml=bl_db" target="_blank">this</a> didn&#039;t take long.
In order for there to be a Official Tea Party response, doesn&#039;t there ned to be an official Tea Party? Instead of, you know, a loose affiliation of various local-level wingnut groups and their corporate sponsors?
Seems like Bernie should be allowed to give the Socialist response.
While I sort of hate to link to Po&#039;o, <a href="http:\/\/www.politico.com\/blogs\/media\/\?ml=bl_db" target="_blank">this</a> didn&#039;t take long.
and deliver another babby.
As someone pointed out upthread: Stepford.
Because there are now three separate and incompatible versions of the GOP: Wallstreet, Libertarian, and Ravinglunatic.
They hate each other more than they hate us, even.
This is good news for ... well, us.
So Rand Paul is now officially the Harold Stassen of the 21st century.
The backstage door. That&#039;s where the wonkette groupies hang.
In order for there to be a Official Tea Party response, doesn&#039;t there ned to be an official Tea Party? Instead of, you know, a loose affiliation of various local-level wingnut groups and their corporate sponsors?
Meet Cathy?
AAACCCCCKKK!!!
Good point. In that case there would be nothing to prevent a Vile Snark Mob response, either.
Who would be our on-air spokesperson?
Just as long as she humbles herself before and obeys the male Republicans.