304 Comments
User's avatar
William O Miles's avatar

Team Trump figured out early, even before 'landsliding' into office, that once at the controls of the legal system, they can rampage quasi-legally, semi-legally, pseudo-legally, proto-legally and bald-faced illegally and the Loyal Opposition will take days, weeks, months & years to catch up. Set enough fires in enough dumpsters and you can burn down Wahington, which is plainly the object in view,

Expand full comment
Bob's avatar

Has anyone created an ActBlue meme coin, yet? There's millions to be made there.

Expand full comment
tegrat's avatar

here's a good article about actblue, which is apparently getting some unfair bad press even without the DOJ's help https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/4/24/2318653/-Looks-like-I-m-gonna-have-to-chime-in-about-the-ActBlue-brouhaha?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=trending&pm_medium=web

Expand full comment
GemlikeFlame's avatar

"Poll: Canadians despise Trump and distrust US"

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/26/canada-election-poll-favorability-00311632

That's OK, so do the rest of us.

Expand full comment
RRJKR's avatar

"Hinky donations"? You mean like "tech" billionaires doanting hundreds of millions of dollarts to MAGA candidates? Like that?

Expand full comment
Rick Jacobs's avatar

I find it strange that right after this story appeared in Wonkette and several other websites, I got 3 money-begging text messages in as many hours from "Act Blue".

As I always do, I deleted the message and blocked the number, (Fat lot of good that does).

And just for the record, I doubt seriously those messages were really from Act Blue.

Expand full comment
Sally Lunn's avatar

" Amazing scheme, " darnit, they'll be bragging now. Brilliant article. I wonder if catsup and burnt steak will be on the menu for the * special dinner. * Cryptocurrencies such as the Trump coin profit by fractional, aye ? I tried to invest in Nvidia whose stock price rose to something like $68K per share, no lie, but had NO IDEA what I was doing, so attempted to sell a percentage of my Nvidea stock by transferring it into * wait for it * crypto currency via this nifty app for trading newbies called Robinhood, and fucking well made a GD fortune !!!! $1.71 !!!!

Expand full comment
Zyxomma's avatar

Ta, Dok. I'm quite cross with ActBlue. They have shared my phone number with EVERY fucking Democrat in the country who is running for ANY office. However, we all know that every accusation is a confession, and we all know who was put into office with TONS of foreign money and interference. For fuck's fucking sake!

Expand full comment
I Stedman's avatar

For several years there was a woman who claimed as her 'residence address' for voting status was a place forbidden from being a residence. Not merely zoned against, but actively forbidden.

That's voter fraud.

The place was Mar-A-Lago, which as a condition for being a private club was legally forbidden from being used as a private residence. The woman was Ivanka Trump.

Expand full comment
Always Childless Cat Lady's avatar

Democrats fight back to the Act Blue attack! Get Citizen's United repealed!!! Get it freezed in the interim too.

Expand full comment
lordpnut's avatar

And kick Alito in the sack.

Expand full comment
Stephen St John's avatar

Just unbelievable what that bastard continues to get away with. I'm pretty sure this whole "dinner with the president" thing ruins afoul of all the rules. Our government has as much legitimacy as the WWE now.

Expand full comment
Coffee Envy's avatar

Let me get this straight. It’s OK for Elon Musk to create a PAC of one person, and use it to give $288 million to elect Trump, but I as an individual am limited to giving $3,500, if I don’t create my own PAC or decide not to donate to a PAC or Party Committee (where I could give somewhat more).

But it’s OK for Trump to sell Teslas in front of the White House and OK to offer dinners with him if you buy his coins.

But it’s not OK to have a service like ActBlue that takes our small donations to help our local candidates, because they are part of the opposition party.

Expand full comment
Stephen St John's avatar

Short answer: IOKIYAR. Absolutely disgusting.

Expand full comment
Jamshied Sharifi's avatar

Every accusation from this criminal fucker is an admission. The whole “order” reads like a rundown of Pumpkin Pinochet’s election crimes. It’s all fucking upside-down.

Expand full comment
Colbert Thorenson's avatar

If I were a betting man, and not on a fourth-tier sports gambling app like secretary beer-bong, I'd put my money on the freeze thing. That is definitely going to happen.

Expand full comment
Erisian's avatar

"The order itself, if you’re interested in knowing the pretext for the DOJ “investigation,” claims that congressional Republicans found evidence of possibly hinky donations to ActBlue that are very criminal"

"Federal law (52 U.S.C. 30121 and 30122) strictly prohibits making political contributions in the name of another person, as well as contributions by foreign nationals.

Notwithstanding these laws designed to protect American democracy, press reports and investigations by congressional committees have generated extremely troubling evidence that online fundraising platforms have been willing participants in schemes to launder excessive and prohibited contributions to political candidates and committees.

...

Further, there is evidence to suggest that foreign nationals are seeking to misuse online fundraising platforms to improperly influence American elections. A recent House of Representatives investigation revealed that a platform named ActBlue had in recent years detected at least 22 “significant fraud campaigns”, nearly half of which had a foreign nexus. During a 30-day window during the 2024 campaign, the platform detected 237 donations from foreign IP addresses using prepaid cards, indicating that this activity remains a pressing concern." [from the link]

* Three words: "Russia, Russia, Russia."

* Are the "press reports" from unbiased news sources or from the likes of Fox, NewsMax, and OANN.

* "investigations by congressional committees have generated extremely troubling evidence"

"investigations by [RINO controlled] congressional committees have [fabricated] extremely troubling evidence [out of thin air]" FIFY

* Online fundraising platforms are not illegal, and they exist on both sides of the aisle. The Dems and liberals have ActBlue while the RINOs MAGAdroids, and New GOP has WinRed:

> "WinRed is the #1 fundraising technology used by conservatives. Donors from across the country can easily connect with causes and candidates that they support.

How Do Donations Work

Donations made on our platform go to the WinRed PAC and then get transferred directly to the candidate you want it to go to!" https://support.winred.com/en/articles/3056005-what-is-winred

* "foreign nationals are seeking to misuse online fundraising platforms to improperly influence American elections" This rather than the Fulvous Fuckwad soliciting donations to his Inauguration Committee, which is nothing more than a slush fund since monies not spent on the inauguration have no restrictions on where the excess goes and the influence contributions will buy:

> "the fact that inaugural committees can accept unlimited contributions as well as corporate money — make them an ideal way for wealthy special interests to buy political access and influence, ultimately drowning out the voices of everyday Americans

...

Donating to a president’s inaugural fund is a highly effective way for uberwealthy individuals and big corporations to win political favor. Unlike contributions to a presidential campaign, there is no limit to how much money an individual or corporation can donate to an inaugural fund.

...

While previous presidents have typically adopted self-imposed limitations on their inaugural fundraising — President Barack Obama capped individual contributions to his 2009 inauguration at $50,000 and President George W. Bush capped them at $250,000 — Trump has not.

On the contrary, he unabashedly marketed his 2017 inauguration as an influence-buying free-for-all." https://campaignlegal.org/update/impact-big-money-and-secret-spending-trumps-second-inauguration

The FEC bars contributions from foreign nationals:

> "Foreign nationals are prohibited from making and inaugural committees are prohibited from knowingly accepting donations from foreign nationals." https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/presidential-transition-and-inauguration/funding-inaugural-committee-activities/

but there exists a simple workaround for non-Americans to also buy influence:

> "This year’s inaugural committee is projected to raise over $200 million in total — and the origins of some of these millions may remain secret if contributions were routed through “dark money” groups.

...

We saw dark money groups make donations to an inaugural fund for the first time in 2017, when Trump accepted a $1 million donation from a mysterious LLC later revealed to be funded by the Wellspring Committee, a notorious dark money group linked to conservative activist Leonard Leo and the Judicial Crisis Network." [op cit]

* "congressional Republicans found evidence of possibly hinky donations to ActBlue"

Question, did the RINO committees *find* evidence or was it handed to them by ActBlue? The 22 “significant fraud campaigns” and the 237 donations from foreign IP addresses were *both* reported by ActBlue in the first place.

* "Notwithstanding these laws designed to protect American democracy"

Since when has Mooseballs Mussolini been concerned about American democracy, other than to pay lip service (like the lip service he gives Vladimir Vladimirovich). In the words of Frank Zappa, "Who you jivin' with that cosmic debris?"

fnord

fnord

Expand full comment
Major Is My Spirit Animal's avatar

Ha ha, the joke's on them - I'll give to candidates even if I have to go buy Bitcoin and write checks on it myself.

Fuck FElon, PAB and sPam Blondi

Expand full comment