Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ne Jabba no barta's avatar

The use of the term “accidental” versus “negligent” to describe an unintended discharge should be the first test of competence of any firearms instructor, or for that matter, owner (for anyone who hasn’t heard the distinction - “accidental” is when the gun malfunctions, “negligent” is when the shooter does). I’ve seen “instructors” use the term “accidental” in interviews to describe someone who fired a gun negligently and even have their pictures taken with their fingers on the trigger. And yes - words matter in how we perceive things.

The guy who sold me one of my firearms was a part time cop. I talked with him a bit while the background check was running. Really nice guy. When I left, he shook my hand - with his left hand. His right arm had been mangled by a shotgun blast - his own. On the way out he told me that there are two types of gun owners - those who’ve had negligent discharges and those who are going to. And my experience has been that that is true. I had mine when I was 13 or so. Scared the he’ll out of me. Luckily I was following the other rules and the gun was pointed down range. So the only harm was a (deserved) whap upside my head by my grandfather.

Despite what the gun nuts say, firearm safety takes a lot of work, diligence, and cost. The fact that you don’t need to prove any knowledge of it to buy a gun in most states is terrifying,

Expand full comment
Ne Jabba no barta's avatar

“Whether the campaign will prove persuasive with gun owners remains to be seen,”

Let me save you the suspense. No. That is all.

Expand full comment
273 more comments...

No posts