Discussion about this post

User's avatar
NorfolkAndWay's avatar

OK, now you done pissed off this gay Democrat nuclear plant engineer. Ah, where to start....<br />Yes Josh (MY HERO!!), we drill more on external attacks now than on internal accidents, because probabalistic risk analysis has determined that they are more likely to occur. (Yes, there are jobs for math majors outside of insurance and baseball.) It really is more likely that some dingus will set up 200 yds from a plant with a shoulder rocket launcher, or load a bread truck full of fertilizer, than it is that an internal accident will occur. Why? Because there are a lot of dinguses out there.<br />"..the Feds have relaxed the safety regulations for nuclear power plants operating beyond their design life" - no idea where you're getting that. License extension from 40 yrs to 60 yrs is a reality, but we have hundreds of issues to address to justify it before it's granted. Fewer than 10 units (of 103) have reached 40 yrs so far, average age is ~30.<br />

NorfolkAndWay's avatar

I have a dozen or so friends who are flight attendants, and all of them get more radiation dose in a year than I have received total in my nuclear career (24 yrs). They just don't realize it. Americans get 620 mR per year of natural radiation from the earth and sun (or 6.2 mSv for you metric weirdos), more if you live in PA mine country or in Denver. Average airline flight crew annual dose is 219 mR. Nuclear plant workers are allowed 5000 mR per year, maybe 5% approach 500 mR. Most get <10 mR. <BR>People are afraid of what they don't understand. I live 6.6 miles by road from a nuclear plant, probably 3 miles as the crow flies. I couldn't care less. Many of my neighbors apparently are unaware of its existence. And you know what - they need not be. I would be more concerned about what chemicals are in my processed meat meals (ugh!!) than that.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?