13 Comments
User's avatar
π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

Spectacular social experiment in progress: what happens to wingnuts and teabaggers if they get exposed to real news and actual facts from non-Faux sources, and aren't bombarded with Obama hatred 24/7?

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

In the words of Dolly Parton: "It takes a lot of money to look this cheap!"

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

Annnnnd . . . here comes Jon Stewart, mocking THIS bit of Faux idiocy. Thanks, Faux! You put the Dip in dipshit for 20 years. (And the shit, also too.)

bobbert's avatar

Help me out on this Greg Gutfeld fellow. I don't have teevee, so the only times I see Fox News is in ER waiting rooms, flicking through channels in a hotel, and the occasional video clip. From this limited exposure, I have been able to deduce that Bill O'Reilly is an ignorant tower of stupid, and that Sean Hannity is a vile, lying sack of shit, but I have no idea about Greg Gutfeld, other than that somewhere back in time some ancestor was really lucky in the land he was allowed to sharecrop.

Do I give a shit about this fuck, or is he just as pointless as most of the Fox talking heads?

schmannity's avatar

By this logic, Fox would have to pay the money over to Chicken Little, The John Birch Society, and Alfred E. Newman.

Olav_Pompatus's avatar

Well, Fox certainly seems to be feeling might self-important these days! You guys do know that you're not the only stupid lying media source around, dontcha? Maybe the best, but not the only.

Spotts1701, Taking Bible Guns's avatar

Oh, sorry Greg. No check from Mr. Colbert. Will you take exposure dollars instead?

Chris Grrr's avatar

Thank you!

Neither did Professor Impossible...

Gherkins d'Resistance's avatar

YOU DIDN'T GAFFE THAT!

malsperanza's avatar

Or truthiness, at any rate.