After the Supreme Court saved Obamacare, AGAIN, most Republicans were more or less content to stomp their feet, shake their tiny fists of fury, repeat their five-year-old warnings that expanded healthcare access will destroy America (any day now, you'll see!), and have themselves a good cry.
Scalia, Thomas and Alito are all old enough to be on Medicare, so Rep. Baby's cunning plan shouldn't hurt them. Unfortunately for him, that also goes for those dastardly traitors Kennedy, Ginsburg and Breyer.
Senator Grassley (R-idiot) is the one responsible for Congressmen and staff having to buy on the exchanges instead of FEHB. Maybe this idiot is mad at the wrong people?
As I understand it, it's not necessarily an end to gerrymandering. The case revolved around whether a special commission set up to take redistricting out of the hands of the legislature is legal. So it could ultimately be the end of gerrymandering in that similar commissions could be established by the states, but it does not require such commissions.
Plus you can reasonably expect toddlers to mature eventually.
Scalia's fave Brady Bunch episode.
He means take their Federal healthcare away and make them use Obamacare.
Rand's Free Market Solution. There is no ailment it can not cure.
Checked right in the balance-yarbles.
The Republican motto should be, "If it ain't broke, we'll break it."
Too bitter.
I don't know, I'd probably want to run it through a jiggery-pokery and then pour it into a tall glass filled with crushed argle-bargle ice.
Medicare, also too.
Finally being able to go to the doctor after years of going without? Yeah, that's a burden I can live with.
Scalia, Thomas and Alito are all old enough to be on Medicare, so Rep. Baby's cunning plan shouldn't hurt them. Unfortunately for him, that also goes for those dastardly traitors Kennedy, Ginsburg and Breyer.
"Cause he's black.
Senator Grassley (R-idiot) is the one responsible for Congressmen and staff having to buy on the exchanges instead of FEHB. Maybe this idiot is mad at the wrong people?
http://www.factcheck.org/20...
Add venom, bile, and gall to taste...
We'll all be fairly represented as we die in unbreathable, hot, filthy air.
As I understand it, it's not necessarily an end to gerrymandering. The case revolved around whether a special commission set up to take redistricting out of the hands of the legislature is legal. So it could ultimately be the end of gerrymandering in that similar commissions could be established by the states, but it does not require such commissions.