Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gherkins d'Resistance's avatar

Weird, your average wingnut troll can't even be bothered to check the factual basis of things he read on FOX, Daily Caller, or DrudgeReport.

But of course, nothing can be done at the EPA until a random wingdoodle does some "independent analysis and substantial reproduction of research results" or something. Plus, that kind of "Science" is absolutely cost-free and can be done by your average schmoe with shit you can find at Home Depot.

It's not specific how "transparent" this data/sciency shit has to be, in order to meet the bill's requirements because, you know, uh, "reasons." About 20G's apiece worth of "reasons" by the Koch Bros, Freedom Project, and Citizens United, dropped into his campaign coffers.

So surprisingly, there is a 2:1 difference between energy company lobbyists and those working for universities or science-related groups lobbying this bill. Of course it's the dirty scientists who are totally there to make sure that lies from the pit of Hell keep getting all that big $$ grant mo-nay to say things like "pollution is bad" or "methyl mercaptans are deadly, don't put them into your lungs."

More of that quality Republican "Governance:" where you block shit up any way possible. Good Job, America. You deserve it.

Expand full comment
SullivanSt's avatar

Have the Republicans realized that under current law, the EPA considers "secret" "science" "studies" from the oil industry asserting safety when deciding that fuck yeah they can pump whatever random shit they want into the ground as long as they remember please to call it "fracking"?

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?