18 Comments
User's avatar
Notreelyhelping's avatar

“Boys aren’t girls, and girls aren’t boys.”

Lola, on line one.

Leema Raven 🤓's avatar

Somebody REALLY needs girlfriend.

SigDeFlyinMonky's avatar

Q: You’re a smart man. What’s happening?A: A gerund.

Carstonio's avatar

For someone allegedly obsessed with the meanings of word, he sure doesn’t know what Marxism means.

tehbaddr's avatar

Why does Merriam Webster have to be so divisive!?

goonemeritus now with chatGPT's avatar

With all the words they seek to define surely some will piss off someone. For many moist is that word.

BrianW's avatar

. . . almost literally a Grammar Nazi, or at least thoroughly anti-semantic.Quotes like this are why I give $$$ to Wonkette every month. Actually, it's more like $, but you get the idea.

Paul Woodford's avatar

When they try you for that one at the Hague, I'll be rooting for them.

TexasDumb's avatar

Today we are all anti-semantics, loosers.

TexasDumb's avatar

"Moist towelettes" can make my blood boil.

Royal Ugly Dude's avatar

“A guy is angry about a dictionary definition, gets arrested for making a bomb threat to the publisher,” sounds like something I saw on Barney Miller

Ward in Cali BOYCOTT CNN!'s avatar

But Dok, you never said...is "yeet" okay?

popebuck1's avatar

"...not just a bigot but almost literally a Grammar Nazi, or at least thoroughly anti-semantic."

*chef's kiss* for such an elegant pun!

Commentista's avatar

Thirty four years old. Lives with his mom. Hits the computer downstairs after she goes to bed, when she’s not there to be a “filter.” Vents about “trannys.” Well, all that tracks. I’ll bet his browser history is a fascinating collection of wank bait.

Tosca's avatar

I can see why he's so mad, though. His only cogent debate strategy is snidely saying, "Well, the dictionary definition is...", and the dictionary goes and changes the definition to something he can't use???

Mark Lungo's avatar

No woman deserves this asshole.