Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Princess Erika the Radiant's avatar

I am by no means an expert in tax law, but I think I understand this:

You inherent stock worth for simplicity sake $100 billion at the time of death and it rises by 5% to $105 billion, you only pay capital gains tax on $5 billion

Now, here is my question - say rather than a 5% increase, the stock decreases by 5% - does that mean the heirs can sell the stock, pocket $95 billion dollars and take a $5 billion dollar capital loss which means that not only would they be getting $95 billion tax free, we'd be actually paying the heirs to take it

Nice work if you can get it

Expand full comment
Aunt PithyPat's avatar

I am an expert in NOTHING to do with money, and my answer is - probably. I mean - why not? It seems farfetched, but it benefits rich fuckwads. So someone has at least proposed it at some point, I am sure.

Anything for the rich in this shithole nation.

Expand full comment
247 more comments...

No posts