If these "uncommitted" cause Trump to be reelected, they can live under a dictatorship just like the rest of us.
Somebody tell first time voters how well that worked out in 2016. How about the self righteous voters (Bernie supporters) who didn't vote, or voted Bernie because he was on the ballot but no way could he win .
If the NYT was truly unbiased, they’d show Trump’s tweets alongside Biden’s tweets and let the public decide. Also too CNN. Show Biden speaking to the people on a split screen with Trump speaking to his howler monkeys. Let the people see this shit. It’s not like they don’t have teams of videos. If it wasn’t for Meidas Touch and their content , I’d be willing to give the MSM a break. But no, they have the examples, they simply choose not to use them.
If you don’t like Biden’s policies toward Gaza, just wait until Trump (jeebus forbid) gets back in and gives Bibi the green light to ethnically cleanse Gaza completely.
My take is the Never Biden crowd never voted for him in the first place, and probably never voted for a Democrat ever. They have a lot of suspicious (Russia) talking points that are recycled from 2016 (Bernie Bros) and they can kick rocks. If only the media would ignore them, we'd be better off.
The Times just wants 2017 again when there were so many scandals every day journalists simply held their cups out the window and Trump scandals would fill to the brim. Good news is no news at all, right? Because Biden has the gall to simply run a steady ship completely void of scandal (Hunter penis don’t count) the msm must subsist on doubt. They are scratching the bottom of the barrel with the stories about Biden being old. They want chaos, dammit!
Note: They present Biden's win as flawed because some people protested. They present Trump's win as immaculate. This despite Nikki Haley taking nearly 27% of Trump's vote and uncommitted only taking 13.5% of Biden's. Here's another presentation of the facts: "Trump wins Michigan but still lost nearly 27% to rival Nikki Haley which indicates his popularity has weakened over the years. President Biden coasts past rivals to win Michigan solidifying his opportunities in a key swing state."
A good lesson on how the press "tells the truth" while kind of not telling the truth. See: The Economy is Good, but for How Long?
Fuck the NYT.
really hating this timeline. though i don't want to go back to 1354, i mean...
Ta, Dok. All of us must do our part, whatever that is, to make sure Biden is reelected. With votes.
All these people who say Biden can end the war overnight are naive, stupid, and dumb about foreign policy.
Biden is none of those things. I consider the above, well I said it.
But their flaming online has to be at least part Russian. Hello, Internet Research Agency!
Of course Russia wants Putin's puppet.
If these "uncommitted" cause Trump to be reelected, they can live under a dictatorship just like the rest of us.
Somebody tell first time voters how well that worked out in 2016. How about the self righteous voters (Bernie supporters) who didn't vote, or voted Bernie because he was on the ballot but no way could he win .
Also too Jill Stein. Vote Biden, goddamnit!
Read and learn
https://www.newsweek.com/myths-cost-democrats-presidential-election-521044
If the NYT was truly unbiased, they’d show Trump’s tweets alongside Biden’s tweets and let the public decide. Also too CNN. Show Biden speaking to the people on a split screen with Trump speaking to his howler monkeys. Let the people see this shit. It’s not like they don’t have teams of videos. If it wasn’t for Meidas Touch and their content , I’d be willing to give the MSM a break. But no, they have the examples, they simply choose not to use them.
Today's Theory (mine)
In 2020 many Rep who did not want DT ever again voted for JB.
In 2024 the same are voting for NH with fingers crossed.
If DT becomes the nominee, they will hold their nose and vote for JB again.
Marianne Should-Be-Committed.
My sis just told me Marianne Williamson is back in the race!
Did she change her name to Marianne Uncommitted?
‘... Biden “facing significant opposition,” 78-16. Trump “again coasting,” 65-31...’
(Pinches forehead...)
Math is very confusing.
Trump seen eating a soft serve cone! Looks like Sleepy Joe has lost the 'Ice-cream Vote'. Pictures at 11!
If you don’t like Biden’s policies toward Gaza, just wait until Trump (jeebus forbid) gets back in and gives Bibi the green light to ethnically cleanse Gaza completely.
If Trump wins, nuclear warheads will be dropped on Gaza and Kyiv on January 21.
My take is the Never Biden crowd never voted for him in the first place, and probably never voted for a Democrat ever. They have a lot of suspicious (Russia) talking points that are recycled from 2016 (Bernie Bros) and they can kick rocks. If only the media would ignore them, we'd be better off.
The Times just wants 2017 again when there were so many scandals every day journalists simply held their cups out the window and Trump scandals would fill to the brim. Good news is no news at all, right? Because Biden has the gall to simply run a steady ship completely void of scandal (Hunter penis don’t count) the msm must subsist on doubt. They are scratching the bottom of the barrel with the stories about Biden being old. They want chaos, dammit!
They want chaos? They should try doing state, regional, and local reporting. Things in the laboratories of democracy are guano city!
The Times has been TRASH this election cycle. They're trash a lot but it's bad even for them.
NYT is actively seeking Biden's loss and no one can convince me otherwise. CNN is right behind them
Yeah it's an unavoidable conclusion at this point.
Note: They present Biden's win as flawed because some people protested. They present Trump's win as immaculate. This despite Nikki Haley taking nearly 27% of Trump's vote and uncommitted only taking 13.5% of Biden's. Here's another presentation of the facts: "Trump wins Michigan but still lost nearly 27% to rival Nikki Haley which indicates his popularity has weakened over the years. President Biden coasts past rivals to win Michigan solidifying his opportunities in a key swing state."
A good lesson on how the press "tells the truth" while kind of not telling the truth. See: The Economy is Good, but for How Long?
Fuck, the NYT is a steaming pile of flaming garbage.
Weakening the Dem candidate to "send a message" sounds really familiar.
smh
I've been saying all this shit reeks of 2016
There's definitely a lot of that going on. I expect the level of disinfo and ratfucking to eclipse what we saw in 2016. Gotta head it off!