Discussion about this post

User's avatar
HermitSongs's avatar

This story is still not about that. Attorneys can and probably do use peremptory challenges to strike jurors who’ve survived similar crimes to their cases, but that ability is usually limited, but there is no rule anywhere that categorically bars sexual abuse or assault survivors from serving on juries for sexual assault or abuse cases. Someone reported to you incorrectly. And in any case the problem in *this* story is not that the juror was a sexual assault survivor. It’s that they *lied* on their jury questionnaire and then made *public* statements that strongly suggest they went into the case without an open mind.

Expand full comment
Eve Examines 🐈‍⬛'s avatar

Yeah whatever. MY point is pretending the courts can control what jurors do and don’t think, and everything they say on that micro level is a fantasy. Also super glad that you know what all the rules are in all the courts everywhere in the world.

Expand full comment
248 more comments...

No posts