People keep telling us "be patient, it takes a long time to build a case", but it seems to me pretty open and shut when Rump confessed to multiple felonies every week in his Twitter feed.
"5:00 Judge Mehta is trying to tease out how to treat to a speech which combined comments about his job with comments that were clearly not." Probably the same way I'd treat a swimming pool which combined elements of incontinent kids and people with better bladder control.
"Referring to cases and shit" is a clear violation of due process, or perhaps dew process, or maybe doo-doo process.
If I haven't said so before (and even if I have) as a once-upon-a-time lawyer who changed careers, I find her articles both legally sound and rib-tickling funny, also, too.
Thanks for your service, Liz, and also for the tip about a new chai-like tea. I am a new convert to Harney & Sons and I am definitely going to try this flavor now - their Egyptian Chamomile is like the nectar of the gods!
Yes. TFG is trying to say that EVERYTHING he did/does is part of his job and the plaintiffs are saying that isn't the case and that he made these comments as a candidate.
Screw that, he should have been arrested while IN office. The whole claim that a sitting president can't be accused of a crime is based on absolutely no legal precedent.
I look at both as conspiracy. Alternate electors plan A, and when that didn’t work, rally the deplorables for insurrection plan B
Dayum, Liz, thank you for doing that. I think I would have broken my phone listening to that for 4 hours.
People keep telling us "be patient, it takes a long time to build a case", but it seems to me pretty open and shut when Rump confessed to multiple felonies every week in his Twitter feed.
Ta, Liz. Well done.
"5:00 Judge Mehta is trying to tease out how to treat to a speech which combined comments about his job with comments that were clearly not." Probably the same way I'd treat a swimming pool which combined elements of incontinent kids and people with better bladder control.
Wouldn't that make Dems the conspirators against drumpf?
Yeah, I get you don't want to catch sidebars on a mic, but it does end up recorded, so they way it was worded in the post was weird.
"Referring to cases and shit" is a clear violation of due process, or perhaps dew process, or maybe doo-doo process.
If I haven't said so before (and even if I have) as a once-upon-a-time lawyer who changed careers, I find her articles both legally sound and rib-tickling funny, also, too.
Or "The One Branch of Government."
I think a large part of the arguement is that tfg's comments were part of official duties and as such, part of the Govt, which cannot be sued.
Thanks for your service, Liz, and also for the tip about a new chai-like tea. I am a new convert to Harney & Sons and I am definitely going to try this flavor now - their Egyptian Chamomile is like the nectar of the gods!
Yes. TFG is trying to say that EVERYTHING he did/does is part of his job and the plaintiffs are saying that isn't the case and that he made these comments as a candidate.
Exactly. That fat orange son of a bitch should have been arrested the second he was out of office.
Screw that, he should have been arrested while IN office. The whole claim that a sitting president can't be accused of a crime is based on absolutely no legal precedent.
Asked and answered long ago... https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
Right? I got excited when Republicans got so mad at Facebook they almost changed their minds about anti-trust actions.
Almost.