The simple reason that far more university professors are progressive is that they are intelligent, they think, they challenge historical fiction sold as fact, they are not racist, sexist, or mendacious. The simple reason Republicans oppose them is they know the professors are correct…and oppose them for that.
Who are those masked, hoodie-cloaked, plain-clothed ICEmen anyway? The convicted J6 Proud Boyz? 3%ers? Oath Keepers? How do their victims know they’re not being kidnapped by the modern day KKK? Shouldn’t “stand your ground” laws hold in this situation? They don’t provide identification. And they look and act like lawless vigilantes.
Warren is explaining her heart out and the two men on the panel are nodding emphatically, so that either means they are well aware that she is right and their cohost is a shit-fer-brains, or they're hoping that by nodding Warren won't turn on them too
Sara Eisen's questions were fair for people who doesn't know constitutional law or how things work. Sometimes the dumb question has to be asked in order to give the teacher the opportunity to address those students who are otherwise afraid to ask the dumb question and who need basic things explained.
I have no idea as to Ms. Eisen's education or knowledge. I presume she was asking questions in good faith. I have asked "the dumb question" when I knew the answer because I knew that there were others who didn't know and they had to hear it from someone in authority.
Many thanks to Senator Warren for her excellent explanation and treating the question in the manner she did instead of just dismissing Ms. Eisen for asking the question. Hopefully some people learned something from the answer that was given.
I think she asked her questions in good faith. I just don't know if she was just that clueless or ill prepared, or just wanted to ask the "dumb question" in order to get Senator Warren to explain the basics. I don't watch Ms. Eisen enough to form an opinion about her motives.
No, not a bunch of assumptions for no reason at all. More of the benefit of the doubt since I don't know enough about Mr. Eisen to make an allegation that I cannot sustain, or even be snarky about.
Basically, I thought it was a good "softball" question to toss to Senator Warren, and Senator Warren knocked it out of the ballpark. And she did it without being condescending to Ms. Eisen.
I just hope that other people who don't know Congress's authority over tariffs pursuant to Article I of the Constitution, learned something from Senator Warren's response.
Putin and Zelinskyy aren't going to make the orange-outang look good just so he can get his sycophants to nominate him for the Nobel Peace Prize. Which means there's nothing in it for Donnie, so he's all, "Fuck it. Why bother?"
Go give "Sir" 40 whacks, Lizzie I'll even supply the axe. Figuratively and metaphorically speaking of course. I do not condone nor endorse violence or murder under all but the most extreme of circumstances.. State supported or otherwise
I find myself seriously in love with Elizabeth Warren. Forget about all those mindless actresses and models, She is my "dream girl" I've even told my wife, and she understands. We're both "bleeding heart Libruls" and proud of it.
She’s been gaslighted. She doesn’t understand HOW he got the authoritah!!! But she also studdered about “policy”. Back to schoolhouse rock. And she’s giving money advice? She should go to fox
Fox might be too high-falutin' for her. Maybe Newsmax.
Ooh, at Newsmax, she could catch the eye of the Bee Man, Marjorie Taylor Asshole's latest squeeze. That could lead to an awesome fight. My money would be on Marj.
If there was a God, the fight would occur beside a fountain or pool.
Reminds me of Spokesbitch Barbie who thinks that because Rump "signs" a thing it makes the stuff in that thing "legal". "SEE! That's his signature right THERE!"
Stunning. I thought people at CNBC were supposed to have a grasp of how financial stuff works and a bit about the role of Congress in the power of the purse.
If Warren owned me like that I would never show my face in public again.
The simple reason that far more university professors are progressive is that they are intelligent, they think, they challenge historical fiction sold as fact, they are not racist, sexist, or mendacious. The simple reason Republicans oppose them is they know the professors are correct…and oppose them for that.
WOW. CNBC is hiring imbecilic MAGAturd bitches like Eisen now?
Who are those masked, hoodie-cloaked, plain-clothed ICEmen anyway? The convicted J6 Proud Boyz? 3%ers? Oath Keepers? How do their victims know they’re not being kidnapped by the modern day KKK? Shouldn’t “stand your ground” laws hold in this situation? They don’t provide identification. And they look and act like lawless vigilantes.
❤️❤️❤️
To think… Liz Warren could have been president. The clarity... the power of reasoning… the dignity… the respect… (sob)
It’s an uphill battle for her. Unfortunately she’d have to get Mike and his Johnson to agree what a day means to congress.
Warren is explaining her heart out and the two men on the panel are nodding emphatically, so that either means they are well aware that she is right and their cohost is a shit-fer-brains, or they're hoping that by nodding Warren won't turn on them too
Sara Eisen's questions were fair for people who doesn't know constitutional law or how things work. Sometimes the dumb question has to be asked in order to give the teacher the opportunity to address those students who are otherwise afraid to ask the dumb question and who need basic things explained.
I have no idea as to Ms. Eisen's education or knowledge. I presume she was asking questions in good faith. I have asked "the dumb question" when I knew the answer because I knew that there were others who didn't know and they had to hear it from someone in authority.
Many thanks to Senator Warren for her excellent explanation and treating the question in the manner she did instead of just dismissing Ms. Eisen for asking the question. Hopefully some people learned something from the answer that was given.
There's zero percent chance that her questions about Harvard were in good faith.
I didn't see her questions about Harvard, so I cannot respond in good faith. I will trust your judgment since you saw that part of the interview.
Thanks.
Some people probably did. I don’t have any confidence that Eisen did tho.
I think she asked her questions in good faith. I just don't know if she was just that clueless or ill prepared, or just wanted to ask the "dumb question" in order to get Senator Warren to explain the basics. I don't watch Ms. Eisen enough to form an opinion about her motives.
So, you're just making a bunch of assumptions for no reason at all?
No, not a bunch of assumptions for no reason at all. More of the benefit of the doubt since I don't know enough about Mr. Eisen to make an allegation that I cannot sustain, or even be snarky about.
Basically, I thought it was a good "softball" question to toss to Senator Warren, and Senator Warren knocked it out of the ballpark. And she did it without being condescending to Ms. Eisen.
I just hope that other people who don't know Congress's authority over tariffs pursuant to Article I of the Constitution, learned something from Senator Warren's response.
These multiple, nationwide protests against Sir are Sir's Biggest Crowds Ever -- many people are making!!!
So, Sara Eisen gets paid like a lot of money to talk about financial things to the whole country, right?
She kinda gives off a beauty-pageant-contestant-and-the-world-peace-question vibe.
Sounds like CNBC has a case of Fox envy...
OT: I guess stopping the Ukraine war in 24 hrs hasn’t worked for sir. Now they are just giving up.
Putin and Zelinskyy aren't going to make the orange-outang look good just so he can get his sycophants to nominate him for the Nobel Peace Prize. Which means there's nothing in it for Donnie, so he's all, "Fuck it. Why bother?"
Bingo
When he made that promise, he didn't realize how hard it would be.
Nobody knew healthcare could be so hard.
Go give "Sir" 40 whacks, Lizzie I'll even supply the axe. Figuratively and metaphorically speaking of course. I do not condone nor endorse violence or murder under all but the most extreme of circumstances.. State supported or otherwise
January 20, 2025. A day that will live in infancy.
And stupidity
And idiocy. And cruelty. And pointlessness.
I find myself seriously in love with Elizabeth Warren. Forget about all those mindless actresses and models, She is my "dream girl" I've even told my wife, and she understands. We're both "bleeding heart Libruls" and proud of it.
Guess that Ms Eisen missed the civics class on checks and balances in middle school. And should’ve come to my tutorials.
Ms. Eisen works on Teevee. She don't need no stinkin' tutorials.
She’s been gaslighted. She doesn’t understand HOW he got the authoritah!!! But she also studdered about “policy”. Back to schoolhouse rock. And she’s giving money advice? She should go to fox
Fox might be too high-falutin' for her. Maybe Newsmax.
Ooh, at Newsmax, she could catch the eye of the Bee Man, Marjorie Taylor Asshole's latest squeeze. That could lead to an awesome fight. My money would be on Marj.
If there was a God, the fight would occur beside a fountain or pool.
Reminds me of Spokesbitch Barbie who thinks that because Rump "signs" a thing it makes the stuff in that thing "legal". "SEE! That's his signature right THERE!"
Oh. Holy. Shit. They all think he's Zaphod Beeblebrox.
Stunning. I thought people at CNBC were supposed to have a grasp of how financial stuff works and a bit about the role of Congress in the power of the purse.
If Warren owned me like that I would never show my face in public again.
They did at one time. Now they spend all day with Jim Cramer.