We didn't know it was possible for someone who reads actual books and is a nerd to have bad grammar and spelling, but apparently it is, as one of them has written us to tell us that we committed "acts of common stereotyping" in our posts detailing Christine O'Donnell's beliefs about
Did this Nameless Thing read that fucking thread? There was ALL kinds of loud-and-proud nerdery on display. I myself revealed some prodigious geekery, if I do say so myself. And, really, pay attention and you'll notice that all the writers here are total nerds about one thing or another (like, say... POLITICS). Lighten up, dork! You're making the rest of us look bad.
When somebody makes low hanging fruit the <i> subject</i> of the conversation, they&#039;d better be prepared, to deliver, is all I have to say, on the matter.
Anyone else here like the use of <i>&quot; and so forth&quot;</i> at the end of what, a half dozen epithets? That was goddam good, imo.
Needz moar latin non sequiturs.
This is obviously written in Palin-Speak which I do not understand.
Are we going to have to argue about whether Star Wars is &quot;really&quot; sci fi or whatever? Subgenre parsing fights are THE WORST!
<b>A++++</b>
Yeah? Well I hate... smiley faces with fezes! Take THAT!
Word nerds: the worst kind.
You, madam, obviously know the secret to a healthy marriage. You should write a book!
I love you in ways that amaze even me.
You&#039;re more correct than you think <a href="http://video.google.com/vid..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-53314295...">http://video.google.com/vid...
punctuation are for sissies
Did this Nameless Thing read that fucking thread? There was ALL kinds of loud-and-proud nerdery on display. I myself revealed some prodigious geekery, if I do say so myself. And, really, pay attention and you&#039;ll notice that all the writers here are total nerds about one thing or another (like, say... POLITICS). Lighten up, dork! You&#039;re making the rest of us look bad.
How does he know about O&#039;Donnell&#039;s low hanging fruit?????
When somebody makes low hanging fruit the <i> subject</i> of the conversation, they&#039;d better be prepared, to deliver, is all I have to say, on the matter.
that comma placement is confusing and i first read: &#039;you lampoon lord&#039;
which is pretty much wonkette accurate.
now i have to go back to &#039;timeline of arda&#039; website.
Anyone else here like the use of <i>&quot; and so forth&quot;</i> at the end of what, a half dozen epithets? That was goddam good, imo.
I&#039;m assuming he&#039;s running for a state office somewhere?