Sometimes Megyn Kelly does a thing where we don't hate her, and then we write "Megyn Kelly did a thing and we didn't hate her" and the commenters go URGGGH UGHHHH WHY CAN'T YOU BE MORE VENGEANCIER WE HATE YOU FOR NOT HATING HER REEDUCATION CAMPS FOR MEGYN KELLY AND ALSO FOR YOUUUUU! So boring you guys. Why not appreciate when terrible people are unterrible for a second? Why not give them gentle back-pats, and then they might like their gentle back-pats, and try to get more of them, by not being Megyn Kelly once in a while?
No glass desk and crotchcam for Megyn? And pwning rightwing darlings like Huckleberry and Rove and Darth Cheney? Maybe she's starting to give the orders there. Ratings = Power.
Oh yeah - it's a calculated strategy. She's actually quite smart, and she knows right-wing bullshit when she smells it. Sometimes I think she's playing a character, Colbert-style ... it would be interesting to see her get out from under the evil Murdoch spell, but I'm sure the Faux News money is much too good to pass up.
'Round and 'round and 'round it goes, and where it stops nobody knows! Although informed speculation has it somewhere up Huck-a-Boo-Boo's ass.
A sensation I have never experienced - someone making a good point on Fox News.
Good thing comments are not allowed at Wonket, or else some joker would do just this very type thing!
No glass desk and crotchcam for Megyn? And pwning rightwing darlings like Huckleberry and Rove and Darth Cheney? Maybe she's starting to give the orders there. Ratings = Power.
Imagine the fun she'd have with a gasbag like Trump!
Oh yeah - it's a calculated strategy. She's actually quite smart, and she knows right-wing bullshit when she smells it. Sometimes I think she's playing a character, Colbert-style ... it would be interesting to see her get out from under the evil Murdoch spell, but I'm sure the Faux News money is much too good to pass up.
Megyn Kelly is swearing and smoking, then bossing men around?! Now Bill O&#039;Reilly&#039;s <i>falafel</i> just started smoking.
What about this? <a href="http://www.sfweekly.com/the..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://www.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2012/03/02/comm...">http://www.sfweekly.com/the...
So... wait... what?
&#039;Round and &#039;round and &#039;round it goes, and where it stops nobody knows! Although informed speculation has it somewhere up Huck-a-Boo-Boo&#039;s ass.
Way too many hits on &quot;Dog Strangling&quot;.
Nobody ever expects the Megyn Kelly Inquisition!!!
What do you expect when Roger Ailes hires only leggy blonds who smoke Lucky Strikes and drink rye?
I believe the appropriate response is &quot;Total ownage, n00b&quot;.
Haters gonna hate. And it&#039;s still Faux, so - no upfists for you, Megyn Kelly, if that is even your real name.
I think the Huck got a little turned by that conversation.
M Kelly would be more rebellious.
<blockquote>We&rsquo;re drinkin&rsquo;, we&rsquo;re smoking&rsquo;, we&rsquo;re having premarital sex, with birth control</blockquote>
Let me know when they start having <i>marital</i> sex.