Melania, 'I Really Don't Care' Jacket Is NOT A Good Look
Are you fucking kidding us with this?
No, the Daily Mail didn't fake up an AP photo of Melania Trump wearing a Zara jacket this morning with a graffiti-style scrawl "I Don't Really Care, Do You?" on her way to the border to learn that the children are very HAPPY in their new NOT SHELTER, A HOME!
"They refer to these as shelters, but it is really a home for the children. This is their house. So their bedrooms… https: //t.co/zxa1k58p9c
— CBS News (@CBS News) 1529599282.0
She already sued their ass once BUT GOOD, with the dick who put Gawker out of the misery of Existence. You don't think they'd do their due diligence?
And now, Melania Trump's spokesman confirms to Acosta, with a little reminder to us NOT TO BE SEXIST like a COMMON MICHELLE WOLF.
FLOTUS spox confirms Mrs. Trump wore a jacket to visit border kids that reads: "I really don't care. Do you?" Spox… https://t.co/YZPfreAsgn
— Jim Acosta (@Jim Acosta) 1529607000.0
That is a very true thing! Sometimes we don't shut up about Hillary Clinton's Mao jackets and how they are covering up her spina bifida and Down syndrome, and forget to focus on her policies of Not Putting Babies In Concentration Camps. And other times, a former fashion model can't be held responsible for LITERALLY WEARING AN 'I DON'T CARE' JACKET while she is going to see those same babies.
So, you know, eat me.
What are you libtards complaining about? It's not like it was a pants suit.
100% this is not a random coincidence.The alternatives are:A. WH version: Melania somehow already had this jacket in her wardrobe because: a) She was just breezing thru Zahra and couldn't resist the bargain of a $39 jacket, or b) A staffer randomly bought it and put it in with all her other $4000 jackets, or c) she or a staffer knowingly bought this jacket on line "because it was fun"AND d) She somehow randomly pulled the jacket out of her wardrobe that day and decided to wear it: e) without noticing the very large text all over the back. or f) knowing what it said but thinking no-one could possibly have a problem with it.hmmm.OR...B. After being ordered to go put a positive spin on her husband's odious decisions, she herself orchestrated the jacket as some kind of rebellion, knowing that it would cause chaos.orC. She was a chump set up by anti-Trump staffers who wanted to make her look bad,orD. She was a chump set up by pro-Trump staffers who were signalling to his base.I just don't know.... ALL of the possible alternatives are equally absurd. I guess this is the world we are living in..