Trump is a valiant opponent of antisemitism, as long as it doesn't mean treating actual Jews like human beings. Volodomyr Zelenskyy is one such Jew. Trump not only treated him like yesterday's trash, he called in his bench bullies to help with the trashing.
Oh, but "family members"! I can't see Trump marrying Jared on either one's best day. That doesn't count.
Trump saying he isn’t antisemitic because the Abraham Accords is akin to a guy in a white pointy hood saying he isn’t a racist because his neighbor is black. Trump has always been an antisemite. He’s stated on tape that he likes Jews for his bookkeeping because they’re good with money. Trump hates Jews, it’s just that he hates Muslims even more.
You are saying the guy had a literal Nazi salute as his inauguration and is trampling fundamental rights for all Americans is not actually concerned about the civil rights of American Jews?
As a Jew, I didn't find a single thing on his list as germane to the issue of whether Trump is antisemitic. It sure seems to prove that Trump is a Likud supporter, but the actions of the Netanyahu Administration since 10/6 have pretty much been the worst actions an Israeli government has ever done to make the lives of Jews less secure. As to having Jewish relatives, Stephen Miller is allegedly Jewish, too, and I can't think of anyone who ever held a position of power in the US government who has done more to make the lives of Jews insecure.
Hey, I was reading a newsletter from an Animal Rights Group and they are funding research that doesn't use animals. And then I was reading about our new budget and all the pain it causes. So, here is my idea, let's use Republicans to replace the lost animals. So, here is my reasoning. They have no feelings and they are convinced God loves them. They do not feel pain and they are not very bright and they would probably eat the food formerly reserved for animals. And they could be convinced to clean their own cages. Sounds like a win-win to me.
Weirdly the NIH has started to limit animal research.
It is literally the only good thing in the entire shit stain of an administration.
I am guessing they put it in there because there is some conspiracy shit about animal experimentation. Or setting up and faking animal research is really expensive, while faking data to grift is easy.
Texas also heavily gerrymandered. In fact so much so that Trump is pushing him to do it now Democrats are hoping it will happen because we will actually give them more votes. That’s how gerrymandered we were. He can’t gerrymander anymore without hurting his own party.
I was sorta hoping that SCROTUS would rule limits on gerrymandering to be unconstitutional. Since “fair maps” states are nearly all blue, it would have resulted in maybe a dozen more Dems.
"I was sorta hoping that SCROTUS would rule limits on gerrymandering to be unconstitutional."
Sadly - literally zero reason why under John "I don't want Black people to be able to vote at all" Roberts any opinion like that would be vomited out of this particular composition of SCOTUS
Especially after his 2013 Shelby County ruling, where some of us raised as much hell as we could that if he ruled the way he did and gave as his rationale "the US doesn't have racism anymore" -- which is literally what happened -- that what is happening now would be the exact outcome we're looking at
I just posted an article that literally tells Missouri voters to quit electing Republicans. We are heavily gerrymandered, though, and it will take convincing at least some of the MAGA voters to flip and heavily engaging the non-voters if we will get them out of office. I'm gonna be bald before I am sixty if things don't change.
So what law or legal principle did he cite in this letter? IANAL, but I’m pretty sure there’s no law that says Chatbots have to always give you the answer you want.
But hey, Missouri taxpayers, aren’t you glad you’re paying for his thirsty need for political grandstanding?
I have no idea what law he might think applies (putting aside that the First Amendment would not allow there to be fraud in connection with an opinion, let alone one related to a politician). But then, I don't understand the lawsuit that somehow involves both Trump any the woman who (doesn't) represent me in Congress, claiming money damages because a poll in the Des Moines Register indicated they were going to lose an election they in fact won.
It’s weird how their definition for battling antisemitism doesn’t include anything about helping actual Jewish Americans deal with discrimination or going after crazy rightwingers who shoot up synagogues.
Doesn’t policing the output of AI rather defeat the purpose of AI? If we dictate its outcomes, what’s the point in having it “think” in the first place?
"Objective facts"?!! Is it possible for a literate adult today not to know how LLMs work?
Jesus; where did this guy get his law degree and BAR accreditation from?
A carnival prize?
Box of cracker jacks?
Is it just a kids menu from Olive Garden with 'Law Degree" written with crayons and backwards letters?
Missouri voters have a right to know!
U of MO School of Law. Though U of Moe would have made more sense.
Trump is a valiant opponent of antisemitism, as long as it doesn't mean treating actual Jews like human beings. Volodomyr Zelenskyy is one such Jew. Trump not only treated him like yesterday's trash, he called in his bench bullies to help with the trashing.
Oh, but "family members"! I can't see Trump marrying Jared on either one's best day. That doesn't count.
Trump saying he isn’t antisemitic because the Abraham Accords is akin to a guy in a white pointy hood saying he isn’t a racist because his neighbor is black. Trump has always been an antisemite. He’s stated on tape that he likes Jews for his bookkeeping because they’re good with money. Trump hates Jews, it’s just that he hates Muslims even more.
You are saying the guy had a literal Nazi salute as his inauguration and is trampling fundamental rights for all Americans is not actually concerned about the civil rights of American Jews?
Shocked, I tell you, I am shocked.
😂
Of course, in these cases, "Antisemitism"="disagreeing with Benjiman Netanyahu".
They are just so transparent...
As a Jew, I didn't find a single thing on his list as germane to the issue of whether Trump is antisemitic. It sure seems to prove that Trump is a Likud supporter, but the actions of the Netanyahu Administration since 10/6 have pretty much been the worst actions an Israeli government has ever done to make the lives of Jews less secure. As to having Jewish relatives, Stephen Miller is allegedly Jewish, too, and I can't think of anyone who ever held a position of power in the US government who has done more to make the lives of Jews insecure.
Hey, I was reading a newsletter from an Animal Rights Group and they are funding research that doesn't use animals. And then I was reading about our new budget and all the pain it causes. So, here is my idea, let's use Republicans to replace the lost animals. So, here is my reasoning. They have no feelings and they are convinced God loves them. They do not feel pain and they are not very bright and they would probably eat the food formerly reserved for animals. And they could be convinced to clean their own cages. Sounds like a win-win to me.
Weirdly the NIH has started to limit animal research.
It is literally the only good thing in the entire shit stain of an administration.
I am guessing they put it in there because there is some conspiracy shit about animal experimentation. Or setting up and faking animal research is really expensive, while faking data to grift is easy.
Texas also heavily gerrymandered. In fact so much so that Trump is pushing him to do it now Democrats are hoping it will happen because we will actually give them more votes. That’s how gerrymandered we were. He can’t gerrymander anymore without hurting his own party.
I was sorta hoping that SCROTUS would rule limits on gerrymandering to be unconstitutional. Since “fair maps” states are nearly all blue, it would have resulted in maybe a dozen more Dems.
"I was sorta hoping that SCROTUS would rule limits on gerrymandering to be unconstitutional."
Sadly - literally zero reason why under John "I don't want Black people to be able to vote at all" Roberts any opinion like that would be vomited out of this particular composition of SCOTUS
Especially after his 2013 Shelby County ruling, where some of us raised as much hell as we could that if he ruled the way he did and gave as his rationale "the US doesn't have racism anymore" -- which is literally what happened -- that what is happening now would be the exact outcome we're looking at
Ta, Gary. Who put all these idiots in charge?
Voter in 2016.
Non-voters who stayed home in 2024.
I just posted an article that literally tells Missouri voters to quit electing Republicans. We are heavily gerrymandered, though, and it will take convincing at least some of the MAGA voters to flip and heavily engaging the non-voters if we will get them out of office. I'm gonna be bald before I am sixty if things don't change.
Here it is. You can delete this comment if it isn’t allowed.
https://open.substack.com/pub/wuzzittoya/p/missouri-you-have-to-quit-electing?
So what law or legal principle did he cite in this letter? IANAL, but I’m pretty sure there’s no law that says Chatbots have to always give you the answer you want.
But hey, Missouri taxpayers, aren’t you glad you’re paying for his thirsty need for political grandstanding?
I have no idea what law he might think applies (putting aside that the First Amendment would not allow there to be fraud in connection with an opinion, let alone one related to a politician). But then, I don't understand the lawsuit that somehow involves both Trump any the woman who (doesn't) represent me in Congress, claiming money damages because a poll in the Des Moines Register indicated they were going to lose an election they in fact won.
Can Bailey rendition an AI chatbot to Alligator Auschwitz? And what if it doesn't want to go?
It’s weird how their definition for battling antisemitism doesn’t include anything about helping actual Jewish Americans deal with discrimination or going after crazy rightwingers who shoot up synagogues.
Less talking and more sucking Bailey, and don't forget the balls!
These people are wearing me out. The constant drum beat of sue, sue, sue. Ugh.
Doesn’t policing the output of AI rather defeat the purpose of AI? If we dictate its outcomes, what’s the point in having it “think” in the first place?