He'll back off if he’s “persuaded that the position I currently hold isn’t the correct one.” Fuckwit needs persuading, all right . . . with a 2x4.
So of all the problems that I understand Missouri to have, the one that deserves immediate action is to undermine filing of state taxes (snooze) of legally married same-sex couples. May I suggest that there are more pressing issues, such as the presence of one Nick Marshall in the state Senate?
<i>&ldquo;accepting the jointly-filed state tax returns of all legally-married couples who file Federal returns is the only appropriate course of action, given Missouri statues</i> <strong>[sic]?????</strong><i> and the ruling by the U.S. Department of Treasury.&rdquo;</i>
<a href="http:\/\/splicd.com\/beN4qE-e5O8\/234\/238" target="_blank">This sums up Missouri nicely</a> (Thanks, Lizzie Tish! I think it was you who turned me on to Crash Course)
He&#039;ll back off if he&rsquo;s &ldquo;persuaded that the position I currently hold isn&rsquo;t the correct one.&rdquo; Fuckwit needs persuading, all right . . . with a 2x4.
What problems? We dont have any problems....
The old standby, &quot;win an election,&quot; is right out.
Wow, that&#039;s amazing.
I know. I yawn every new utterance of it. Wingnuts ought to get a new catch phrase. Nazis, INPEACH! and Muzlin are pass&eacute; these days,.
Can Nick Marshall&#039;s complaints against Nixon be counted as a jeremiad?
<a href="http:\/\/cathedralstl.org\/parish\/online-tour\/the-statues\/" target="_blank">Kneeling Angels,</a> too.
sigh. I got nuthin. sometimes? the stupid - it overwhelms.
Nah, too Gaud&iacute;
So of all the problems that I understand Missouri to have, the one that deserves immediate action is to undermine filing of state taxes (snooze) of legally married same-sex couples. May I suggest that there are more pressing issues, such as the presence of one Nick Marshall in the state Senate?
<i>&ldquo;accepting the jointly-filed state tax returns of all legally-married couples who file Federal returns is the only appropriate course of action, given Missouri statues</i> <strong>[sic]?????</strong><i> and the ruling by the U.S. Department of Treasury.&rdquo;</i>
The use of Missouri statues to determine law is an important tenant of their judicial system and it is not for us to refudiate that.
Those statues are fixed, for all intensive purposes, so arguing is a mute point.
Nick, if you&rsquo;re going to get your diapers in bunch why not try something important like Missouri&rsquo;s 41st rating in education?
<a href="http:\/\/splicd.com\/beN4qE-e5O8\/234\/238" target="_blank">This sums up Missouri nicely</a> (Thanks, Lizzie Tish! I think it was you who turned me on to Crash Course)
A &quot;Wonkette Prime&quot; version. I might pay for that.