Oh Rachet Campos-Duffy, isn't it time for you to squeeze out another babby for the nanny to care for while you show the world just how ignorant you are?
I remember when parents got their microwave.Mom: "Now don't listen to your father, this is how you use it."Dad: "Now don't listen to your mother, this is what you do."
My guess is that a lot of their workers tend automated production lines, so their primary drain is attentiveness, not physical exertion. Shift changes in that environment cost money (cookies), and it's a safe bet that the extra 4 hours of pay per worker per week costs less than the production loss across a shift change.
Let's say they can pull off an extraordinarily efficient 1-hour shift change downtime - that'd be one hour per day making dog-only-knows how many cookies and crackers. At the scale they must run, an hour of downtime is a truckload of $$.
And, as noted below, I've known people on back-to-back 12x3 low-exertion shifts, meaning they work 6 days and have 8 off, and they were pretty happy with the arrangement.
Lulling us into a sense of complacency before the MGT stupidity story.
LOL, a friend who was in Weight Watchers some years ago used to save up her fruit points so she could have 2 or 3 glasses of wine at night!
Now I want dodectuple-stuffed Oreos.
/oblig
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
Things are supposed to go on top of the Ritz cracker.
Don't tease us like that!
FYI Keebler Townhouse crackers substitute well for Ritz crackers.
Just be ultra careful not to lose the clots! No gargling, flossing, I'd even be careful brushing. Dry sockets is where the throbbing pain begins.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
They're not like Twinkies. Oreos don't last forever.
Ernie uses child labor.
And Oreos can't save the world!
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
Oh Rachet Campos-Duffy, isn't it time for you to squeeze out another babby for the nanny to care for while you show the world just how ignorant you are?
I remember when parents got their microwave.Mom: "Now don't listen to your father, this is how you use it."Dad: "Now don't listen to your mother, this is what you do."
I'm thinking more like a blue whale on a bike.
My guess is that a lot of their workers tend automated production lines, so their primary drain is attentiveness, not physical exertion. Shift changes in that environment cost money (cookies), and it's a safe bet that the extra 4 hours of pay per worker per week costs less than the production loss across a shift change.
Let's say they can pull off an extraordinarily efficient 1-hour shift change downtime - that'd be one hour per day making dog-only-knows how many cookies and crackers. At the scale they must run, an hour of downtime is a truckload of $$.
And, as noted below, I've known people on back-to-back 12x3 low-exertion shifts, meaning they work 6 days and have 8 off, and they were pretty happy with the arrangement.