411 Comments

republicans claiming they can't support this because it will put people out of business if ht4ey pay the workers what they're owed in 3... 2....

Expand full comment

Many years ago, a group of friends chose the restaurant where we all would lunch; they knew there would be dishes to please vegan me. They chose an upper west side Chinese noodle shop called Ollie's. I had never been there before. The food was well-prepared and tasty and the portions were large, but I got really, really bad vibes.

It turns out Ollie's had been ripping off their employees for YEARS. They pooled tips and stole from the pot, when I think the wage without tips was $2/hour. Ollie's got busted and closed up shop. I don't know whether or not their robbed employees ever were made whole, but I doubt it.

Expand full comment

They should have named it the Wage Theft Accountability Fiat. ;-)

Expand full comment

No picture can do justice to those Diego Rivera murals in Detroit. I grew up in Detroit and surrounding white-flight areas, and we made regular trips to the DIA. The murals are huge and wrap around a large lobby-like hall that displays only the murals, as I recall. The best thing to see in Detroit.

Expand full comment

Agree agree! My fam dragged us kids to the DIA a fair number of times, and I adored and was mesmerised by those murals.

Expand full comment

Did you ever go to the Detroit Historical Museum, too, with the "Streets of Old Detroit" exhibition down in the basement? I recall it from the 60s and 70s.

Expand full comment

Oh wow - I don’t think so. But it sounds awesome! My BF’s aunt was a curator at the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, so I’ve been there... but it seems we missed the DHM. Poop.

Expand full comment

Henry Ford Museum was pretty cool, too, and the attached Greenfield Village. It made for a long day!

Expand full comment

Does this do ANYTHING for probably the largest class of workers who get stiffed, undocumented immigrants? In order for the law to protect them, any worker involved in a wage dispute would have to be granted immunity from the thugs of ICE, including stiff penalties for anyone violating that immunity.

Expand full comment

That's one big reason why republicans have zero interest in immigration reform and fixing our broken system. People who want to come here to work could easily be given guest work visas of some sort, but then employers are less able to exploit them.

The other big reason is that its red meat to their ignorant bigot base.

Expand full comment

we are not supposed to notice these things, any more than the corporate media does

Expand full comment

T he GQP uses them to scare Wyomings that Jackson Hole will be overrun by filthy Central Americans.

Whose countries are fucked up because of our "guidance."

Expand full comment

What's the big deal? These job creators are just walking off with a few pennies here and there. No biggie.

Expand full comment

if minimum-wage workers get stiffed, why don't they just get a million dollar loan from their old man? No, on second thought, make that two million.

Expand full comment

Hi Mitt, how is it going?

Expand full comment

Once again, UNFAIR New York targets Trump UNFAIRLEY with NO FAIRNESSES and RIGGERS.

Expand full comment

Geez. You people really hate America. And capitalism

Commies!

Expand full comment

I dunno why the senate even bothers. None of that will pass the house. They'd be much better served staying open 24/7 to deal with this Tuberville mess.

Expand full comment

That's a state issue, from what I read.

Of course, Dok said the State was so nice they named it twice. There's something about that that kind of bothers me.

Expand full comment

No, ypu know that's the nonsense that the city of New York likes to push. Both the state and city happen to be named New York as there in no place actually named ''New York City''...

Expand full comment

It was named after Charles II's Catholic brother, the Duke of York. He succeeded to the throne but was deposed and chased out of Britain by his daughter Mary and her husband William of Orange, in the "Glorious Revolution" of 1688, because he was seen as trying to bring Great Britain back to the Universal Catholic Church step by step, and he was just a hand puppet for England's arch enemy Louis XIV.

Expand full comment

His campaign to capture New Amsterdam was actually inept. The Dutch agreed to give it up because it was not long-term defensible and Britain gave them another colony in exchange. So there was a mocking poem about it, which was still circulating when I was a schoolchild: "The famous Duke of York, he had ten thousand men, he marched his men right up the hill and he marched them down again. And when they were up, they were up up up! [at this point the kids stretch up on tippytoes] And when they were down they were down down down! [kids squat] And when they were only halfway up, they were neither up nor down! [make silly up-and-down motions]"

Expand full comment

And yet there is an Orange County in New York state.

Expand full comment

First it was named New Amsterdam, then it was named New York. So, named twice. No, we don't count the indigenous names. Yes, I know, city not state. I stand by my non-comment!

Expand full comment

Yeah, but named twice thing is usually a reference to NY, NY.

Expand full comment

Yes. I know. I was riffing off that, in fact.

Expand full comment

This sounds like a personal attack on the Trump organization.

Expand full comment

Look for Republicans to tank this bill on record time.

Expand full comment

Look for Republicans to tank this bill on record time.

Expand full comment

spent many stoned hours grokking the Diego Rivera mural in the DIA when i was younger … it’s always been 1 of my favorites … thanks, now if i could go & eat in their beautiful cafeteria …

Expand full comment

In Ann Arbor after college I had a quirky artistic housemate who sometimes told stories about going down to Mexico to paint murals with his uncle. He never named his uncle. But then one day my mom and I were in the Rivera room and met him, and then I learned that he was Frida Kahlo's nephew, actually, and while Kahlo and Rivera had difficulties sometimes Rivera was always "Uncle Diego" to him when he was young.

Expand full comment

DAMN. Wow. Dang!!!

Expand full comment

Dartmouth College, at the time a bastion of rich white kid privilege, somehow had Jose Orozco paint a very leftist mural in the reserve corridor of their library in the 1930s, and even more inexplicably never painted it over or covered it up -- it's one of our most remarkable artifacts.

We've since moved on a long way, but the rich white kid aspect is not entirely gone.

Expand full comment

Wait ... Hochul did a Dem thing? Well, that's nicetime.

Expand full comment

From back in 2016:

> Donald Trump is like Jesus for Christians who've rejected the teachings of Jesus.

https://www.facebook.com/jfugelsang/posts/pfbid0YkBA1ZN79tJo27P4f8P2DMFGSYodMEjuwQhAEw9siGKXkT1n35wCbK7ACYZwToRJl

Expand full comment

I like saviors who haven't been crucified!

Expand full comment

From that same time-frame:

The Apocalyptic Argument for Trump: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/09/the-apocalyptic-argument-for-trump.html

> So, let’s say you are a conservative Republican of a decidedly evangelical bent, and are struggling a bit with misgivings about the presidential nominee of your political party, Donald Trump. He does not, after all, fit most definitions of a “godly man,” and beyond that he does not seem to have any sort of well-articulated plan for what he’s going to do if he’s elected, other than to gloat over the despair of his many enemies and detractors like a heathen warlord at the Sack of Rome.

> The simplest way to buck oneself up for the unpleasant task of supporting this philistine is to make it a matter of religious and civilizational necessity. Thus it is not surprising to see an apocalyptic note begin to creep into the rhetoric of Trump’s Christian-right supporters.

And then a discussion of the mindset that got people to the point of comparing voting for TFG rather than let Hillary win, to storming the cockpit of Flight 93 rather than let it be flown into its target.

Expand full comment

You would burning at the stake would be their choice.

Expand full comment

It was a little more than just vaping.

————————-

Boebert Apologizes for Vaping in a Denver Theater

The Colorado congresswoman previously denied vaping during the performance, but could be seen doing so on surveillance video.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/16/us/politics/boebert-theater-vaping-apology.html

Expand full comment

"Oopsie! I was caught!"

Expand full comment

There's video of him playing with her new tits while she's groping his crotch, all while there are families with kids seated in the theater around them.

They behaved like rutting beasts.

Expand full comment

Rutting Beast liebullx!!1

Expand full comment

So is her district going to fire her ass next year?

Expand full comment

what makes you think vaping, oafish rutting beasts are in disfavor in the north Georgia district that elected her? It is obvious that she is no pointy-headed liberal elitist who follows society's rules, so if anything it is probably good publicity for her. Her voters probably can't be taken out in public, either, probly have to throw them on the back to git they shoes on. (spits)

Expand full comment

That's MTG. Big Boobs Boebert is in Colorado. Hopefully posted next year.

Expand full comment

I stand corrected. They are so alike as to be interchangeable.

Expand full comment

Boebert is in a mixed district - there is some chance that her constituents are grossed out by her. I think the last election was close.

Expand full comment

I wonder if she'll survive the primary.

Expand full comment

Hey, diddle diddle!

Expand full comment

Her opponent only needs 300 people to change their minds

Expand full comment

She will need to explain to them why she was in that liberal enclave of Denver, too.

Expand full comment

And junk pummeling with the co-owner of a bar that hosts drag shows

Expand full comment

Junk Pummeling would make a good porn name.

Expand full comment

I was wondering what the age range for this play was. I think.the movie is PG13 so I assumed the play would be the same.

Expand full comment