198 Comments
User's avatar
*Corvid Opera*'s avatar

"That online course he took in not being racist has produced some great results."

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

Is our politicians (distance) learning?

Expand full comment
*Corvid Opera*'s avatar

If "good" now means pathetic, ignorant, and puerile, sure.

Expand full comment
SydneyP's avatar

Surely you don't mean Mr & Mrs Clarence Thomas? (Her name is Virginia.)

Expand full comment
Opiwan's avatar

Election Day holiday and 6 weeks of early voting? EPIC WIN!

Expand full comment
Stroke1's avatar

Hey now. Don't go dragging us into this. We have a few things named for Stonewall Jackson but a hell of a lot more things named for Robert Byrd.

Expand full comment
Stroke1's avatar

Behold, the Benedict Arnold Boot Memorial.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

https://images.app.goo.gl/B...

Expand full comment
Khavrinen's avatar

That Dude's just signing shit all over the place:

https://earther.gizmodo.com...

Expand full comment
ScottGoode's avatar

Yeah, there's someone who never dwelled on the past ;)

Expand full comment
Linda Moss's avatar

Putting spicy brown mustard on a hamburger...

Expand full comment
Satanic Pancake's avatar

When reached for comment, South Carolina confederate monument Lindsey Graham had nothing intelligible to say.

Expand full comment
John Thorstensen's avatar

The smile is photoshopped, I believe. He was an incredible hero, and the March to the Sea was conducted, I understand, with great discipline -- they destroyed property ruthlessly but there was little or no mistreatment of civilians. This is remarkable:

VI. As for horses, mules, wagons, &c., belonging to the inhabitants, the cavalry and artillery may appropriate freely and without limit, discriminating, however, between the rich, who are usually hostile, and the poor or industrious, usually neutral or friendly. Foraging parties may also take mules or horses to replace the jaded animals of their trains, or to serve as pack-mules for the regiments or brigades. In all foraging, of whatever kind, the parties engaged will refrain from abusive or threatening language, and may, where the officer in command thinks proper, give written certificates of the facts, but no receipts, and they will endeavor to leave with each family a reasonable portion for their maintenance.

Expand full comment
Dorothea is a Democrat's avatar

We need to do the same fucking thing with the United States Senate.

Expand full comment
Bageled Mind Virus's avatar

I'm for pretty much everything that makes these treason flag fetishists mad

Expand full comment
mailman27's avatar

GOP hates the Postal Service because:1. Unionized workforce2. Possibility of higher turnout thru vote-by-mail3. Unionized workforce

Expand full comment
tiredsucker's avatar

"Toilets provide the best context for Confederate memorials but are unfortunately too small to manage most of them."

We just need to make some bigger toilets.

Expand full comment
๐”…๐”ข๐”ข๐”ฉ๐”ท๐”ข๐”Ÿ๐”ฒ๐”Ÿ๐”Ÿ๐”ž's avatar

I very much like the way NY (or at least NYC) does voting: you show up, they have your signature from the last time you voted, and you give them another signature right there on the spot. They eyeball it to see if it's close enough, and you're good to go. You'd have to practice lots and lots of different signatures, and be able to execute them all on demand, to do any serious frauding.I don't think there are all that many voters who can only produce an "X", and you'd have to know an awful lot of them to impersonate them at the polls.

Paper ballots are scanned, so you get both computerized counting and a hard copy in case of any questions. Adequate security beyond the scanning stage is something the voters just have to hope for, but that's going to be true of anything short of manual counting by a small army of worker bees -- and even then you have to trust that their numbers are securely toted up.

Expand full comment