Of course, corporations were never 'born', so they aren't people for the purpose of any law either, huh? Who gave whom the authority to declare corporations people? Or not-people?
(Heh heh heh. Not jolly likely they'll worry about that).
Even though it’s already been said 1000 times before but it is not about abortion but about controlling and scaring women. Once they’re born no one gives a shit.
I thought the ReichWing despised activist judges making nationwide rulings instead of sticking to their own jurisdictions.
Didn’t Chump file cases with the Supreme Court demanding that they ban nationwide injunctions?
Not sure why they are judge shopping and letting their corrupt activist judicial buddy lay down permanent bans at the national level in direct conflict with their constant whiny hissy fits of the previous 4 years and there current complaints seeking SC intervention.
Activist Judge = Someone who rules what RWNJs/Republicans/Christofascists don't like. Usually aligns with the Constitution, precedent, and rule of law.
Regular Judge = Someone who rule what they do like, even if illegal or constitutionally questionable. The crueler and more intrusive the better.
“But it confers no authority to distinguish between types of health information to accomplish political ends like protecting access to abortion and gender-transition procedures”
So as long as your health care is non-controversial, you got nothing to worry about. Donald Trump can lie about his weight and we can’t prove him wrong. Judge Kazmaryk can have a penis pump installed to aid him in impregnating his handmaids, and that’s nobody’s business but his.
Lawyers are the worst fucking sophists around. "I know nothing about this topic, but using some dictionary definitions and a vague idea, I'm going to fuck shit up for actual real people, but I don't have to see their stupid faces anymore, so I don't care."
Wow. For people who a) are affiliated with undatable men who think women should want to date them, AND b) who believe that women should be making more babies, they surely have a knack for putting both of these activities up in the hard pass end of the desirability scale.
"For example, the 2024 Rule arguably would prevent Dr. Purl from reporting information about a patient being pressured to undergo an abortion... "
But Dr. Purl wouldn't report the person doing the forcing, would she? No, the fucking Nazi bitch would report the person requesting the abortion, who would then be required to somehow prove they'd been forced, or face prosecution.
this fucking POS fed judge should be arrested and thrown in jail !
Of course, corporations were never 'born', so they aren't people for the purpose of any law either, huh? Who gave whom the authority to declare corporations people? Or not-people?
(Heh heh heh. Not jolly likely they'll worry about that).
Even though it’s already been said 1000 times before but it is not about abortion but about controlling and scaring women. Once they’re born no one gives a shit.
Even a non-lawyer like me can see this has to be appealed, even if that means it'll go to the dipshidiots at the Fifth Circuit.
Kacsmaryk is another of those that I hope enjoys their time in hell, and the sooner the better.
NO, No, no to any of this.
these motherfuckers are relentless...i dont know how, but this must all end
Who will end this reign of terror by this sick Christian pedophile excuse of a Republicon Judge?
🙋🏼♂️pick me
Just read this…twice,now ok,i'm not an american,so please excuse my ignorance,but how is this “free”?
This is all a bit closer to stazi than land of the free….no.?
Frozen Fish Heir
Supermarket Heir
A pattern
I thought the ReichWing despised activist judges making nationwide rulings instead of sticking to their own jurisdictions.
Didn’t Chump file cases with the Supreme Court demanding that they ban nationwide injunctions?
Not sure why they are judge shopping and letting their corrupt activist judicial buddy lay down permanent bans at the national level in direct conflict with their constant whiny hissy fits of the previous 4 years and there current complaints seeking SC intervention.
Did Judge K not get the memo or what?
Don't you know the rule is:
Activist Judge = Someone who rules what RWNJs/Republicans/Christofascists don't like. Usually aligns with the Constitution, precedent, and rule of law.
Regular Judge = Someone who rule what they do like, even if illegal or constitutionally questionable. The crueler and more intrusive the better.
Hope this helps!
“But it confers no authority to distinguish between types of health information to accomplish political ends like protecting access to abortion and gender-transition procedures”
So as long as your health care is non-controversial, you got nothing to worry about. Donald Trump can lie about his weight and we can’t prove him wrong. Judge Kazmaryk can have a penis pump installed to aid him in impregnating his handmaids, and that’s nobody’s business but his.
1. FUCK.
2. Once again—I am very grateful I can’t get pregnant.
3. See #1.
Lawyers are the worst fucking sophists around. "I know nothing about this topic, but using some dictionary definitions and a vague idea, I'm going to fuck shit up for actual real people, but I don't have to see their stupid faces anymore, so I don't care."
Wow. For people who a) are affiliated with undatable men who think women should want to date them, AND b) who believe that women should be making more babies, they surely have a knack for putting both of these activities up in the hard pass end of the desirability scale.
"For example, the 2024 Rule arguably would prevent Dr. Purl from reporting information about a patient being pressured to undergo an abortion... "
But Dr. Purl wouldn't report the person doing the forcing, would she? No, the fucking Nazi bitch would report the person requesting the abortion, who would then be required to somehow prove they'd been forced, or face prosecution.