55 Comments

I doubt the mines are <i>that</i> deep.

Expand full comment

Oh, evolutionary psychology, will anyone ever use you to make anything but a tautological just-so story involving completely asinine leaps of logic and a total lack of empirical evidence? *sigh*

Expand full comment

They don't even want women to like them at this point, do they?

Expand full comment

It wasn't a legitimate rope.

Expand full comment

And a dirtier moustache.

Expand full comment

Specifically, "Homo Sap"

Expand full comment

If you've seen that photo of Ann Romney in that fantastic blouse, she might just be a Tit-<i>Fish</i>, with 250 million, also.

Expand full comment

Now we just need to understand why they're incapable of learning from experience...

Expand full comment

Or selective IVF.

Expand full comment

so yeah, i can't unsee that ever.

Expand full comment

<i>high-status animals tend to have more male offspring than female offspring, which holds true across many species, from red deer to mink to Homo sap. </i>

i don't think 'mink' and 'red tailed deer' are exactly the animal analogies you want here kevin.

unless of course you're looking for 'animals hunted by stronger predators'.

Expand full comment

oh and also, 'willard' and 'mink' should never be allowed in the same sentence.

Expand full comment

Well, one daughter he ignored and didn't even acknowledge for years, so his testosterone must have been plenty high.

Expand full comment

Republicans: "W? Who is that? Never heard of him!"

Expand full comment

<em>Somebody</em> goes to bed every night dreaming of being one of Mitt's sister wives.

Expand full comment

"...the children of the general population are 51 percent male and 49 percent female, but the children of the Forbes billionaire list are 60 percent male."

Do you think this might betray some use of selective abortion?

Expand full comment